President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 04, 2011 05:44 PM UTC

Tipton on Medicare

  • 3 Comments
  • by: ClubTwitty

Today’s Grand Junction Daily Sentinel has a guest column by Rep. Scott Tipton, defending the GOP Medicare plan.  It is also posted on the congressman’s web page.

With little detail, and lots of familiar talking points, he describes the plan as one that would:

Protect seniors and those a decade from retirement, ensuring that they receive their promised benefits in full.

Increase accountability and eliminate waste, fraud and abuse.

Provide choice for beneficiaries so that they have the same choices as members of Congress.

Eliminate IPAB and keep critical health care decisions between patients and doctors.

There are a few ‘tells’ between the boilerplate, however, after the fold.

Nothing of course spells out specifically what ‘providing choice’ will mean to future retirees. Although one might find some hints:

Our plan expands access to care, giving future retirees the choice to select from competing health care plans that best meet their needs, offering the same options and choices that members of Congress have.

While that sounds focus-group approved, it glosses over at least one important detail. Perhaps the ‘same choices’ but presumably NOT the $174k annual salary (or cushy retirements) that Members of Congress enjoy.  Selecting among competing plans is one thing–if you are among the shrinking pool of Americans with a six-figure income.  

That of course is not most of America’s seniors. The majority of whom live on fixed incomes.  And particularly so for those just above the poverty line, who would bear the brunt of the pain.  This is a point that the congressman himself recognizes.  Sort of.  

Under the law, the president’s appointees to the Independent Payment Advisory Board are guaranteed a six-figure salary and terms longer than the president and members of Congress. This setup ensures that those in charge of running what is essentially the president’s “Medicare IRS” never personally feel the pain of the cuts they make.

Whether or not the author appreciated the irony of those sentences being is this op-ed is unknown.  It does seem for his part, Mr. Tipton is incensed about government figures receiving large salaries–ones other than himself and his staff I suppose.  Medicare exists to ensure that all of America’s seniors have at least a basic level of care, not only those who were lucky enough to once grace the Halls of Congress.    

 

Comments

3 thoughts on “Tipton on Medicare

  1. The surprise is that he chooses to sell the deal by claiming Medicare and expanded access can only be saved by eliminating it.

    With a 5000-6000 deductible a married couple in their forties (no tobacco use) can get health insurance in Denver for approx $6000-7000/yr.  this, of course.

    For a 10,000 deductible, your annual premium can get down to $4800.

    So you get your $6000 voucher instead of medicare, you just have to suck up a huge deductible and you’re on your own. (stay healthy, or if you get sick, die fast)

    1. Everything a Republican says is a lie or the exact opposite of the truth. Save Social Security by eliminating it and sending all the money to Wall Street. Obama bought into this and it will haunt him forever. Save Medicare by eliminating it and sending all the money to the big three health payment companies (not health care – health payment, there is nothing about them that is health coverage – it is denial).

      Cut taxes of the super-wealthy, and increase it on the 95% of the rest of the U.S. The Bush/Obama tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy has proven how bad that has been for a once great country. How is your Mandarin? The Republicans don’t care if they sold you out.

      With this weekend it is important to know where this weekend came from. It was not Republicans.

      Solidarity

  2. Can’t the Repugs get creative once in a while and mix it up a bit? How about Fraud, Waste and Abuse? Or Abuse, Fraud and Waste? I know it would be harder to memorize, but maybe they could come up with some sort of mnemonic to help them out.

    Frankly, all Repug talking points are boring.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

168 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!