Responding to the announcement last Friday of a sweeping new mandate from the Biden administration requiring millions of American workers to be vaccinated against COVID-19, Colorado Republican Party chairwoman Kristi Burton Brown fired back a volley of pointed if not exactly coherent words in opposition–including the one key word that gets thrown around so often in politics, by persons who know what the word means and those who do not–to CBS4’s Rick Sallinger.
The word in question is “unconstitutional.”
“I mean it’s absolutely unconstitutional. Joe Biden does not have the power to tell private business owners what to do with their employees,” she said.
As we discussed last Thursday ahead of the vaccine mandate’s formal announcement, it wasn’t that long ago when even most Republicans were uncontroversially in support of requiring vaccines for a range of childhood diseases. As recently as 2015 both Cory Gardner and Mike Coffman saw no political risk in endorsing mandatory vaccination for school-age children. As for the constitutionality of vaccine mandates?
In a timely in-depth story last week, Politico explains how The U.S. Supreme Court decided that question 115 years ago in the case of Jacobson v. Massachusetts:
The year was 1904, and when [Rev. Henning Jacobson’s] politically charged legal challenge to the $5 fine for failing to get vaccinated made its way to the Supreme Court, the justices had a surprise for Rev. Jacobson. One man’s liberty, they declared in a 7-2 ruling handed down the following February, cannot deprive his neighbors of their own liberty — in this case by allowing the spread of disease. Jacobson, they ruled, must abide by the order of the Cambridge board of health or pay the penalty.
“There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good,” read the majority opinion. “On any other basis, organized society could not exist with safety to its members. Society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy.”
And that wasn’t the last ruling upholding the constitutionality of vaccine mandates:
In 1922, the Supreme Court further clarified in Zucht vs. King that a school system could refuse admission to a student not meeting vaccination requirements, and that this would not be in violation of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause for singling out a particular class of individuals, the National Constitution Center says on its website Constitution Daily.
Then, in 1944, in Prince vs. Massachusetts, the Supreme Court held that states may require vaccination regardless of a parent’s religious objection, making it clear that religious exemptions offered by states are elective, rather than mandated by the First Amendment, the Constitution Daily explains.
In short, there are words you can use to describe a vaccine mandate. “Unconstitutional” isn’t one. It’s not just factually wrong, it’s tragically ignorant of modern American history.
For generations of Americans in the 20th Century, vaccine mandates to attend school from preschool to university, not to mention as necessary to travel or to work in high-risk professions, were part of everyday life. The eradication of once-devastating epidemics of diseases like polio and smallpox taught a lesson to those generations that they never forgot, but relentless misinformation has chipped away at was once nearly universal consensus in recent years. The partisan politicization of the latter-day anti-vaxxer movement is a phenomenon we have witnessed here in Colorado over the last several years very clearly as local Republicans openly courted anti-vaxxer activists, and that embrace transitioned smoothly into the partisan political resistance to COVID-19 prevention measures.
The consequences of the partisan political backlash against what used to be one of the country’s greatest strengths, the ability to work together to overcome deadly diseases, are far-reaching. But to call what used to be considered our patriotic duty as Americans “unconstitutional” shows how far the reasoning that drives Republican rhetoric has degenerated.
This is the hubris that makes great nations weaker.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: itlduso
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: BREAKING: Matt Gaetz Pulls Out Of AG Nomination
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I get the impression Chairwoman Burton Brown doesn't know the meaning to a lot of words.
She can always ask Lauren Bobert what a particular word means when she is in doubt.
Chairwoman Burton-Brown's attitude and lack of knowledge is further proof of the continuing decline of the Republican party as a meaningful force in Colorado politics.
I don't know, CHB. They've had a few other odd ducks serve as party chair. Remember Steve Curtis? I don't think she is any more dimwitted than he was.
Standard Republican position appears to be that the President cannot impose public health standards. It's a states rights thing — Presidents can advise on policy, can have the CDC track information from facilities that take federal money, and can pay for health measures, but not set the vaccine or public health's mask requirements. Presidents can set up limited quarantines or bar travel from places with outbreaks. Presidents can't do more unless Congress votes for it, too — and we know Congres has not passed legislation authorizing spending for a coherent program.
In the real world, I've not read of the Supreme Court ruling on the President's power. But Republicans are willing to repeat what some of their advisors say about Constitutionality.
Good arguments re: this from Vox:
https://www.vox.com/22666625/biden-vaccine-mandate-covid-19-supreme-court-osha-constitution-legal
You'd think their best argument would be that Republicans are dying from the virus at 5x the rate of Dems?
Admitting that is no way to "own the libs"
“White Prosperity Jebus loves the little Ttumpers, all the Ttumpers of the world . . .
. . . Red and yellow and black may be alright, but white’s what’s MAGA-precious in his sight . . .”
. . . they get to go to
heavenMar-a-Lago faster than Democrats ???This really isn't a non-sequitur. It's yet another example of the utter lack of leadership amongst the Republican inner-circle and how they've managed, in addition to thwarting a quick end to the pandemic, to also forestall the issues of climate mitigation and the opportunities for rural communities to fully participate in a 21st-century energy system. Yes, there is a War on Rural Colorado. No, the assailants aren't who they'd like us to believe they are.
Energy showdown: Member co-op blasts “Hotel California” contracts with regional power provider
Sounds like this is the sole raison d'etre of today's GOP
There's research supporting the idea that the Dunning-Kruger Effect is a Western phenomenon, and perhaps an entirely American one. Dumbshit internet lolyers like ol' Kristi provide anecdotal evidence for those hypotheses.
I offer as Exhibit 'A': on primetime cable tonight, Tucker Carlson discussed Nicki Minaj’s vaccinated cousin’s swollen testicles live on air.
Is it too much to hope that we're in the final swirl of the flushing toilet?