U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 04, 2011 06:44 PM UTC

Reapportionment Rage: What Matters, What Doesn't

  • 21 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: The Colorado Supreme Court has moved the deadline for filing briefs up to Thursday.

—–

The Durango Herald’s Joe Hanel updates today:

Colorado Republicans are furious at the chairman of a commission that voted Tuesday to draw state legislative districts in a way that greatly benefits Democrats.

Mario Carrera, the lone unaffiliated voter on the 11-person Colorado Reapportionment Commission, sided with Democrats on a series of 6-5 votes Tuesday to accept their plan and shut down all GOP attempts to amend it…

Carrera replied Friday and noted a Supreme Court decision that told the commission to avoid splitting counties.

“I recognize that you are upset that I did not vote for the map introduced by Republican commissioners,” he wrote. “Simply put, the Republican commissioners’ maps had many more county and city splits that were not in accordance with the mandate from the court. … I do not regret a single vote, even if the result of my vote caused less than satisfactory results for you as the leader of your political caucus.”

…Earlier this year, Carrera voted for both Republican and Democratic plans. He later drafted his own plan using elements of both maps, and the commission adopted his plan on a bipartisan vote.

However, Republicans led a successful drive to get the maps overturned at the state Supreme Court, so the commission had to try again. Democrats seized the court ruling as an opportunity to draw a map that threatens Republican political fortunes in Colorado for the next decade. [Pols emphasis]

Now that the reapportionment commission has sent these maps back to the Colorado Supreme Court for review, there are two tracks to the story emerging: one of political recrimination and fingerpointing, and the other related to the court’s next steps in reviewing and, based on the expectations of most experts in both parties, approving the new maps.

Only one of these two parts of the story really matters anymore: the next deadline in the court review process will be this coming Friday Thursday, (see update) when briefs from third parties both supporting and opposing the new maps are due. As Republican reapportionment commissioner Bob Loevy has said repeatedly since Tuesday, though, there’s not very much for the court to object to in the new maps–they were expertly constructed to meet the requirements set forth by the court when the maps were remanded. As Hanel and basically everyone else working this story has reported, most Republicans believe the chances of a second remand are quite small.

And if they were to be remanded a second time, what then? All indications we’ve seen are that relations between commission chair Mario Carrera and the GOP have irretrievably broken down. In fact, the flood of attacks on Carrera from Republicans makes it clear that they have no expectation of working with Carrera again, as they did to approve the first set of maps with bipartisan support. The GOP’s choice after that to lead the drive (as reported above) to get the first maps thrown out, coupled with the fierce attacks on Carrera over the second maps, makes it awfully hard to see how, or why, Carrera would try to please them a third time.

Hanel is very fair in today’s story about the procedural he-said she-said the GOP is relying on to stoke outrage over losing this close vote. Hanel reports on emails Republicans say show they were not given the same information as Democrats regarding deadlines, and other emails supplied by Democrats demonstrating Republicans were given the same information. He reports accurately on significant changes Republicans proposed in their own last-minute maps. And most importantly, as we noted, that it was Republicans who led the appeal of the first maps–maps that GOP commissioner Loevy now says it was a grave mistake to appeal.

Bottom line: none of this matters. Once the map is finalized, nobody is going to care about this petulant inside-baseball whining–for which potent counterarguments exist at every step.

The only thing the Colorado Supreme Court is going to consider–the only thing according to Loevy they can consider–is whether or not the new map comports with state law, and their instructions in remanding the original map to the commission. The Colorado Supreme Court directed the commission to reduce the number of county splits. As Loevy has said, the court has no guidance in law obligating it to protect incumbents. And since the decision on Tuesday, it’s been reported that some Democrats have indeed been paired with other incumbents in redrawn districts; as well as Democrats like Rep. Roger Wilson of Glenwood Springs, whose district was made considerably more Republican in order to comply with the court’s instructions.

Democrats with knowledge of the process make it clear to us that the new maps were not their first choice: the maps the commission approved with bipartisan support, and appealed by GOP leadership, were their first choice. Given the instructions handed down by the court in remanding those maps, what Democrats say is that the new maps represent the best choice.

And here’s a simpler message we’re hearing this weekend that you’ve heard before: Republicans are mad because these maps create competitive districts. Competitive races are what the voters want, but Republicans fear them because they require moderate candidates–which they don’t have in ready supply. Mario Carrera, who despite the one-sided reporting has made political donations to Republicans too (see: Scott McInnis, Ryan Frazier), ultimately sided with Democrats because Democrats created more truly competitive districts than Republicans.

Very soon, folks, we think the whining to an insider audience of hundreds over procedure will end–and preparations to meet this new reality with electable GOP candidates had better begin.

Tweet
Share

Comments

21 thoughts on “Reapportionment Rage: What Matters, What Doesn’t”

  2. ” . . . the next deadline in the court review process will be this coming Friday when briefs from third parties both supporting and opposing the new maps are due.”

    I believe this deadline could move a day or so earlier, if the Commission turns their materials in to the Supreme Court before the Dec 6th deadline.  The Court will take written comments (original plus nine copies) on the maps that are submitted.  

    No question that this every-ten-year process is quite difficult.  Some major changes in non-Front-Range areas is getting little attention — a fair number of county splits in rural Colorado for example, plus other major changes in both House and Senate Districts for many rural residents.  There are some rural Districts which do not meet the constitutional requirements of compactness and communities of interest, but the wheels doing the most squeaking are addressing partisan and incumbency issues, not constitutional ones.

     

  3. Pulling out all the stops on a Sunday morning I see. Are you paid by the word?

    You have completely failed. You have failed to account for the “decapitation” of Republican leadership (Bob Loevy’s words), and the pitting of Republican officeholders together for no reason. You have failed to explain why the deadlines were extended for ANYONE. You have failed to explain why consideration of amendments was voted down. You have failed to explain why a minority report, a normal procedure to allow the minority to express its views, was voted down.

    Democrats are stealing the Colorado legislature for the next 10 years! You’re damn right we’re angry. And we’re not going to let the people forget. One thing I know is that independent swing Colorado voters DO NOT LIKE CHICAGO STYLE POLITICS.

    This is not over!

    2. All you do on any issue here is spew bombast and invective. And I don’t think you would use the truth even if it was to your advantage (as you can always find a lie with greater advantage).

      Liberate a least tries to bend actual facts to support his points. You’re just noise.

    3. so it does my soul good too see you in such a fine state of rage.  Democrats always steal, it’s only republicans who play hardball politics.  Ha ha loser (that should tide me over and keep me out of the pews for at least another five years. Thanks for the communion whine.)

      1. There’s really nothing left for you to discuss, is there? You’re not even interested in defending the new Democrat maps on the merits. This is hardball, and you’ve won the game of hardball and I should just deal with it. Fuck us “losers.”

        Am I right? I’d just like for you to admit that is how Democrats feel.

        2. and bawling like a newborn.

          This is the manly Republican response to getting beaten politically.

          And they ALWAYS say it was illegitimate and a elaborate conspiracy of evil doers to boot.

          What an immature partner in the Democratic process.  Wins and losses are to be expected and every party has to adjust to the realities of the moment.

          Too bad cry baby can’t accept the fact that the vote was valid and binding.

        3. Fuck yourself — (there isn’t enough money in this world, nor a pole long enough as far as I’m concerned . . . ).

          And, I can’t speak for all (or even any) Democrats, nor would I presume to try.

          You’re not interested in merits or discussion, so again, do yourself.

        4. Texas style politics, Arap? That’s what the insult ought to be when it comes to reapportionment.  And Florida style for election stealing. Not that what’s happening here bears any resemblance. Just keep the insults straight.

              1. He missed the “Not that what’s happening here bears any resemblance. Just keep the insults straight” part. Shills are very slow to perceive even the most obvious nuance, aren’t they? I guess because it doesn’t exist in their world.

    4. It’s over, AGOP.

      Your lies were disproven within a day of you spouting them.  None of it was true, and repeating it while throwing in random put-downs isn’t going to help now.

      All that’s left is to have the Colorado Supreme Court ratify the map.  Then, like it or lump it, it’s done.

  5. And what would one call the Republican attempt to redo redistricting back in 2003? As a complete ambush, running it through in violation of legislative rules, lying to Dems that they were not going to do that, etc., etc., etc.? Apparently the Rs have forgotten all that….or somehow that was all fair, just gently politics.

    I haven’t heard Keith King comment on being placed with Cadman (let me know if anyone has seen comments). But perhaps he realizes that after leading the 2003 shenanigans, he had better keep quiet now when the tables are turned on him–only this time in a constitutional way.

  6. Simultaneous Briefs are now due from the Proponents and Objectors in the Reapportionment case no later than Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 5:00 PM.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

53 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!