U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 20, 2022 10:33 AM UTC

Welcome to the Establishment, Lauren Boebert

  • 9 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Rep. Lauren Boebert, state Sen. Don Coram.

Two years ago today, Republican Rep. Scott Tipton was assumed to be cruising to another term in a solidly-Republican district in CO-03. In April 2020, there was little reason to think that unknown upstart Lauren Boebert could pose a serious challenge to the six-term Congressman from Cortez.

Two months later, Boebert would go on to defeat Tipton in a Republican Primary by a nearly 10 point margin after Tipton basically forgot to campaign for re-election. Boebert’s bombastic style — yell loudly and often, but accomplish nothing — was a hit with the right-wing base in Colorado who delighted in her regular appearances on Fox News and OANN and Mar-a-lago. Today, Boebert is the undisputed face of a Colorado Republican Party that doesn’t mind a healthy dose of racism as long as the underlying goal is trying to “own the libs.”

Boebert is now facing her own Republican Primary opponent in State Sen. Don Coram, a more moderate Republican from Montrose who bristles at Boebert’s pointless combativeness. Boebert has significantly more resources and name ID than Coram, which makes her the favorite in the June 28th Primary Election, but she is apparently worried enough that she is calling on the establishment Republican lawyers in an effort to keep Coram off the ballot:

Coram was informed by the Colorado Secretary of State’s office last week that his campaign had collected enough petition signatures to qualify for the June Primary ballot. He did cut it a little close, however; Coram needed 1,500 valid signatures for ballot access and was credited with 1,563.

George Brauchler

A lawsuit has now been filed to challenge Coram’s signatures by four CO-03 residents (David Laird, Dale Ruggles, Mandy Roberts and Byron Roberts). They are represented by none other than Maven Law Group, the go-to Republican law firm that includes former State Senate candidate Suzanne Staiert Taheri and former District Attorney/Attorney General candidate George Brauchler. It’s not clear who might be footing the bill for this legal challenge, but Boebert’s most recent fundraising report did include a $10,341 payment to Maven Law Group.

You might recall that Staiert Taheri was the lead attorney on a 2020 ethics case — headed up by Maven — targeting then-Senate candidate John Hickenlooper for the sole purpose of trying to damage Hick’s candidacy against incumbent Sen. Cory Gardner. This effort failed to sufficiently harm Hick, but a lot of establishment Republican types put a great deal of time and money into manufacturing the “controversy.”

The more sane Republicans in Colorado have been keeping their distance from Boebert since her 2020 election; thus it was presumed that Coram’s candidacy in CO-03 would have the support of Colorado Republicans who didn’t want to keep plummeting down the endless rabbit hole inhabited by Donald Trump acolytes and “Big Lie” believers. This lawsuit changes that calculation.

From a strategic perspective, there’s no benefit for Republicans in preventing Coram from challenging Boebert in June. The third congressional district is a pretty solid Republican district, so whoever wins the GOP Primary is likely to cruise to victory in a General Election.

So why do this? Trying to keep Coram off the ballot is a message from the Republican establishment that Lauren Boebert — warts and all — is now part of the club. Apparently, nothing else matters so long as you can raise money and get your face on Fox News on a regular basis.

Coram may be standing by his principles, but Republican lawyers don’t accept that as currency.

Comments

9 thoughts on “Welcome to the Establishment, Lauren Boebert

      1. As for Brauchler, he's currently listed with the state supreme court as still being at the 18th DA's office, and not in compliance with Rule 227 (requiring attorneys to disclose whether or not they have professional liability coverage).  Such lovely DAs the 18th produces  

  1. I could see Republicans removing Coram from the ballot. It is the irrational thing to do when, like MTG, Boebert is about to face a legal challenge. 

    1. Candidates with dumb advisors don’t collect enough. They’re the same kind of advisors who don’t know how to effectively buy 3rd District media. I don’t know who, if anyone, is advising Coram.

  2. Going to be interesting … Sec of State's staff review said

    Number of qualified signatures submitted:  1,953

    Number of entries rejected:  390

    Number of entries accepted:  1,563

    Number of valid signatures required: 1,500 

    Petitioners would need to show a bit over 4% of the signatures approved by staff to be invalid.  Did suit filing include which names ought to have been rejected or any sense of the categories that ought to have been used more for exclusion?

    1. That is interesting John. Since the SOS's office has already rejected 390 entries, that means they have gone through all of these signatures and vetted them already. So now, this lawsuit is somehow claiming they missed at least 63 more? Based on what?

      I am not saying it definitely is, but it smells quite a lot like another bullshit Trumpy-style pointless lawsuit, which would be totally on brand for the Bobo folks.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

44 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!