U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 26, 2012 12:51 AM UTC

Huge Super PAC Ad Buy Drills Romney on "Big Oil" Ties

  • 23 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

In case you haven’t already seen it, Talking Points Memo:

Priorities USA Action and the League of Conservation Voters Victory Fund have gone up with a joint ad buy of $1 million in Colorado and Nevada, the groups announced Wednesday. The ad accuses Mitt Romney of being a “$200 million man” who is “in the tank for big oil.”

“He’s the $200 million man and big oil’s fingerprints are all over him,” the narrator says. “Big Oil’s pledged 200 million to help Mitt Romney, and Romney’s pledged to protect their profits and billions in special tax breaks.”

CNN with the how-dare-yous:

Responding to the ad, Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said Americans are paying “twice as much” at the pump now than before Obama took office.

“President Obama and his allies will do whatever they can to try to deflect blame and cover up for Obama’s failure to control gas prices. Blaming Mitt Romney for President Obama’s failed record on energy and the economy will do nothing to help the household budget squeeze Americans are facing,” Saul said in a statement.

There’s no question such a large buy will result in a healthy percentage of Colorado voting eyeballs making contact with this ad–as we’ve said before about similar ads, a smart head-on response to the intense Republican campaign to blame President Barack Obama and Democrats for rising gas prices. We do believe this is the biggest single ad buy yet this election cycle for Colorado consumption, but we doubt that’s a mark that will stand for long.

Comments

23 thoughts on “Huge Super PAC Ad Buy Drills Romney on “Big Oil” Ties

  1. Mitt Romney actually TALKS to oil companies? Maybe he can actually get the price of gas down then unlike Obama and “$8 a gallon” Steve Chu. One thing’s for sure, hiking taxes on an industry won’t bring the price of their product down (Economics 101).

    1. and have taken economics courses beyond the first week of the first semester. It’s amazing how arrogant stupid people can be: few people would claim to be able to perform surgery based on getting a C+ in Biology 101, but Republicans all want to set policy based on a hazy memory of an Economics course.

      Gas prices are mostly determined by demand, which is why they can easily double in the summer and go back to normal in the winter, despite no additional taxes. That means modestly taxing oil companies will also not noticeably affect prices. It’s called elasticity and is a fundamental concept in the course you were too lazy to take.  

    2. Leadership starts at the top and to date we have had a series of failed policies that focus on driving up fossil fuel prices and handing our grants and loans to failed Soylydra and Abound Solar types.

      The results to date have been massive price increases for electricity, gas and anything related to those (which is just about everything else). Where pricing power is lacking the results have been job losses.

      Real leadership would start and end with an industrial policy focused on moving our nation to a sustainable future with low cost energy for the end consumer.

      If leaders think we’ll attract manufacturing jobs with high cost energy, Obamacare, and failed labor policies … to name a few … they’re completely missing the boat.

        1. Apparently not.  I’m beginning to believe that Libertad is just ArapaGOP’s eviler twin.

          And remember guys, since I’m sure you were never taught this by anyone with a brain, in politics, perception is reality.  So who cares what you guys think.

      1. So every Republican is now just talking like a Democrat to try to confuse people? Just because you’re stupid doesn’t mean everyone is stupid.

      2. to see you are now on the renewable/ sustainable bandwagon.

        a sustainable future with low cost energy for the end consumer.

        There is only one way to get to a “sustainable ” energy future. And it does not involve fossil fuels. They are finite and not sustainable.

  2. Since prices are set by world demand (which is rapidly increasing in China and India), the only way to cut prices (other than another major recession, an option the GOP is never afraid to exercise), the only way “President” Romney could lower prices would be to impose price controls that would cut into Oil company profits.

    Yeah, you’d bet the farm on that happening, right?

    The cost of exploring new fields far outstrips the costs of mature oil fields currently supplying most demand.  Gotta love the GOP candidates’ $2 and $2.50 a barrel snake oil story.  

    Gee, what if we cut demand (and the price of oil) by finding something other than oil to burn?

    Hmmmm…. nah.

    1. That’s a pipe dream. But Romney will prioritize energy development, when Obama has been actively hostile to energy development. And don’t undervalue the role of Republican hawkish foreign policy in maintaining global stability and keeping prices low.

      I think voters should ask the more important question, which is will Romney give Americans greater energy security. The answer is yes.

      1. Exactly.  Thank God we invaded Iraq at the bargain price of a mere Trillion dollars to keep the price of gasoline low during the Bush years!  

        Oh, wait.  They kept going up until he managed to tank the world economy, and the demand for oil with it.

      2. Inconvenient facts:

        Employment in the O&G industry has increased dramatically since Obama has been president.

        The US has recently become a net EXPORTER of petroleum products.

        1. Your second “fact” has been debunked many times.  The US is still a huge oil importer, its just that recently with respect to some speciality fuels that require specialized refineries (like jet fuel) we have become an exporter.  I hate it when I have to say ArapGOP and his eviler twin are right, but they are here.

          As I said above, in politics perception is reality.  And, if the people believe it, nothing we can do about it.  But,really, we can’t repeat falsehoods.

          1. We are now a net exporter of gasoline as well.  ParkHill is correct, if by “petroleum products” you mean refined product – we’re a net exporter in that category (jet fuel, gasoline, LNG, diesel, etc.)

  3. to raise money, but don’t you think you could survive without running the “overturn Roe v. Wade” ads? That’s a little over the top, don’t you think?

      1. explanation. I don’t mean to grouse, but it is irritating to see these ads pop up. Not to mention the occasional photo of that blonde dude who looks like a lady…”Dan Coulter”, I think it is…   🙂

        1. right-click on the ad…open in a new tab…close said tab without ever looking at it.

          Righties pay Pols for your click, and you don’t have to singe your eyeballs with their BS. Win-win.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

56 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!