U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 26, 2012 10:41 PM UTC

Copy Editors Next on Denver Post's Chopping Block?

  • 25 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Westword’s Michael Roberts:

Within the past several months, the Denver Post has made buyout deals with nineteen staffers, including Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Mike Keefe, and laid off popular columnists Mike Littwin and Penny Parker, among others. But the cuts aren’t over. In an internal memo on view below, editor Greg Moore teases a decrease in the number of copy editors; our sources say as many as two-thirds of the positions could be eliminated. And that’s not all.

Earlier this month, sources told us about pay cuts for sports columnist Woody Paige and opinion writer Vincent Carroll, the layoff of Viva Colorado editor and publisher Rowena Alegria and editorial print reductions estimated at eighteen pages per week, with ten of those said to be coming from the sports section.

Not that editorial is the only department facing diminution. Indeed, Alegria was officially a business-department employee — and Moore’s e-mail to staffers, sent Tuesday afternoon, alludes to downsizing at divisions across the width and breadth of the Post’s operation. This jibes with “Service Woes at the Denver Post,” a piece published earlier this week in Colorado Pols, a blog that continues to have a tense relationship with the paper of record. Back in 2010, as you’ll recall, a Post lawyer sent Colorado Pols a letter alleging that the site was lifting too much of its content. In response, Colorado Pols declared that it would stop using any Post material, and it’s stuck with this policy (and typically alluded to the paper generically) for nearly two years…

According to Roberts, there will be another staff meeting on Monday to go over these latest changes, which might involve reporters copyediting each other, relying on an out-of-state resource, or maybe just a lot more errors. As our reader noted last weekend, you might not get your paper anymore anyway, so maybe there’s no need to sweat the little things.

Roberts also cites a report that the Post is trying to sublet a part of their downtown office building being vacated by offices of the Colorado Supreme Court, and that if a tenant were interested in the entire building, “the paper would consider moving.” Despite this, the story in today’s Post “stresses” that the paper will remain in business. Says Roberts,

Once upon a time, such a reassurance would have been unnecessary — but not now.

Comments

25 thoughts on “Copy Editors Next on Denver Post’s Chopping Block?

    1. What would you do if you didn’t think the Post was “right wing trash?”

      Are you admitting that you only care about journalism when you agree with it, and the Post can pound sand because they don’t agree with you?

      That’s the attitude that gave us Pravda. I say that as a victim of the liberal media for decades. You’ve got the wrong attitude about this and it shows.

          1. I guess that’s why they feel the need to carry a gun in their pants at all times.  What wimps.

            There hasn’t been a liberal media bias if there ever was was one in the corporate media since Johnson.  These pathetic dregs are still stuck in the 60’s.  

      1. It is tilted so far right everyday that you are a fool to even consider it being fair and balanced.  It is slowly sinking under it’s right wing feces and bringing on board Carrol and Harsanyi wasn’t going to right (pun) the ship.  Their opinions are straight out of Karl Roves asshole.

        You want to see Pravda reporting?  Tune into Fake News any night of the week.

        Before long Pols is going to be the go to source for Political news in Colorado.

        1. NO, I’d rather not get my news from the most Machiavellian of conniving Democrat Party plutocrats and hit men in the state. Thanks though! You just convinced me to re up my subscription to the Post.

            1. ABOT responds to being boxed in on that. Nicely done.

              No reponse is typical but …well, I was going to say, “I have hope”…but thought better of it…

            2. Sometimes I agree with stories in the Post, sometimes not. My point is that I would never trust a partisan blog as my only source of news on either side. The Denver Post is not perfect, nor its reporters, but there is a commitment to journalism there that no partisan blog can live up to.

              I’m surprise you don’t agree with this, but I think you might really be ok with reading Pravda each day.

              1. The Denver Post is not perfect, nor its reporters, but there is a commitment to journalism there that no partisan blog can live up to.

                  For all their manifest failures, newspapers at least aspire to accuracy and fairness.  The further demise of the Incredibly Shrinking Post is bad news for all who care about public policy in Colorado.  

  1. The Post has been a pretty pathetic excuse for a major city newspaper for a very long time now.  About the only thing saving it was the featured columnists like Littwin, Parker and others – and the fact that they pretty much had a monopoly on sports news.

    But now the charade is over and the Post is fading into obscurity.  I don’t see any viable financial strategy that will save it.

    My annual subscription expires in June.  If the Post lasts that long, I’m not sure that I will renew.  It is too easy to get better information on the Internet – even if the Denver specific stories are sparse.  But, if you don’t care so much about cops, robbers, fires and traffic accidents, there is not a lot of Denver news in the Denver Post.

  2. ignoring the collision that happened years ago.

    Cutting this paper to two editors and a security guard is not going to bring the newspaper to profitability. Maybe trying to become a competent newspaper that has quality, unbiased reporting on local and state issues might.

    Oh, and there’s that web-thingie. Covering it with ads to the point you can’t see the stories doesn’t work either…

    1. And that pretty much guarantees that they will go under. It’s too bad, having a quality local company that provides in depth news and all the daily info is a valuable thing.

      But when the world radicallyl changes you have to adapt or die.

      1. Don’t just say you’d be happy to meet with the DP. Tell us all what exactly you would do to make serious money for the DP to keep solid reporters and a corps of copy editors on staff.

        1. But that doesn’t mean that the Post is not on the road to failure.

          And I’m not sure the solution is to have a staff of reporters and copy editors. That’s trying to fit the old model to a new solution.

          Instead start with what does a paper deliver that people find valuable. And what do advertisers fundamentally want. Start there.

  3. Other than using a failed business model the Post is following the favorite Republican tactic – cut the good stuff and load up on the far right crap.  

  4. The near future of the paper is Spot Blog-like material, where light-weight amateur-hour “insight” abounds and revealing mistakes litter the stories, including the headlines.

    You can’t turn tired reporters into sharp first-draft writers overnight… or ever.

    Hold your nose and watch that big ship dip further under the waves. What a show!    

  5. And, I really, really, like getting up early in the am and finding the paper at my doorstop….Coloradopols does not come on new until about 6:45 am.

  6. The Denver Post began its journalistic slide right after the Rocky Mountain News went under. Frankly, both newspapers needed each other to remain successful.  

    Dumping Mike Littwin is the only good thing the Post did.  He really offered nothing new in his columns, which became annoyingly repetitive.  Mike Keefe and Penny Parker were a loss though.

  7. Roberts also cites a report that the Post is trying to sublet a part of their downtown office building being vacated by offices of the Colorado Supreme Court, and that if a tenant were interested in the entire building, “the paper would consider moving.” Despite this, the story in today’s Post “stresses” that the paper will remain in business. Says Roberts,

      Shortly after both papers moved into the new digs — which I found to be incredibly sterile for all their “green” qualities — Singleton sold the building to an investor and leased back space.  He told us that he wanted to operate newspapers, not buildings, and no doubt the move helped his cash flow.  Once the Rocky Foldedn, space began available to sublet and the courts went there temporarily.  If they want out completely, they could always move back across the street to the RTD terminal building where they rented space before.  At the rate they are going, they could soon move into a phone booth — if phone booths weren’t as obsolete as print dailies.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

85 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!