President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 15, 2022 09:27 AM UTC

Manchin Kills Climate Change Bill to Joe O'Dea's Delight

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Joe O'Dea
Republican Senate candidate Joe O’Dea, second from left

West Virginia “Democratic” Sen. Joe Manchin is every Republican’s favorite Senator. He showed why again on Thursday, as The Washington Post reports:

Manchin told Democratic leaders Thursday he would not support an economic package that contains new spending on climate change or new tax increases targeting wealthy individuals and corporations, marking a massive setback for party lawmakers who had hoped to advance a central element of their agenda before the midterm elections this fall. [Pols emphasis]

The major shift in negotiations — confirmed by two people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe the talks — threatened to upend the delicate process to adopt the party’s signature economic package seven months after Manchin scuttled the original, roughly $2 trillion Build Back Better Act, which President Biden had endorsed.

Manchin has become such a reliable wet blanket for Republicans that political reporters around the country probably operate off of a pre-written template for similar storylines: West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin singlehandedly sunk hopes for [election protection/climate change/tax reform/gun violence] legislation on [insert day].

While Democrats and anyone worried about Climate Change fumed on Friday morning, the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate in Colorado was busy patting Manchin on the back:

 

This Tweet is an interesting look at how Joe “Horse Sushi” O’Dea is trying to pivot toward a broader General Election audience after concluding his Primary Election run by talking about all of his connections to MAGA land and Donald Trump. This is not the first time that O’Dea has praised Manchin, nor will it be the last. O’Dea wants voters who pay some attention to politics to think that Manchin is the ideal example of a “moderate” so that O’Dea can say that he’s just like the West Virginia Senator.

The reality is very different from the spin. Manchin isn’t a Climate Change denier, but he does have strong personal and political ties to the coal industry in West Virginia that (wrongly) color his views on potential legislation. O’Dea, meanwhile, won’t even acknowledge that humans are causing Climate Change:

As we wrote before in this space, O’Dea has also said in no uncertain terms that he would have supported ALL of the recent nominees for the U.S Supreme Court.

O’Dea may want voters to think he’s similar to Manchin, but he’s really more like another former Republican Senate candidate from Colorado who pretended to be a moderate on the campaign trail and then became a rubber stamp for Mitch McConnell.

You might remember the name: Cory Gardner.

Comments

5 thoughts on “Manchin Kills Climate Change Bill to Joe O’Dea’s Delight

  1. In British politics, there is something called "withdrawing the party whip," which isn't as kinky as it might sound. It basically means that the political parties in parliament can kick members out of their caucus. 

    The Tories have kicked members out in recent years over scandals (but obviously not enough members) and Brexit while Labour has tossed out members who had a track of anti-Semitism.

    Here in the US, the last time I recall there being a discussion about excluding someone from one of the caucuses, it was in 2006 when Joe Lieberman lost the Democratic primary for US Senate and ran against the Democratic nominee, Ned Lamont. Harry Reid, who wanted to be majority leader, gave Lieberman a pass.

    But with Lieberman, virtually all of his positions on domestic issues were in synch with the Democratic Party. It was only on Iraq and national security surveillance stuff that he was out of step.

    Why doesn't Schumer just convene the caucus and have them vote on tossing Sinemanchin out? Then the Dems could run in November against the Do-Nothing Republican Senate majority and blame Mitch McConnell for everything. 

      1. Notice I said that Schumer should convene the caucus to toss those two out, not that he should have done that in January 2021.

        Unless Kagan or Sotomayor has a health issue about which no one knows, the Supreme Court is pretty stable between now and January '23.

        Besides, if a vacancy were to occur now, McConnell would claim that it is too close to the election to fill, and at least half of Sinemanchin would probably buy into such bullshit.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

77 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!