U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 19, 2012 12:43 AM UTC

CD-2 GOP Primary a Bellwether Sleeper Race

  • 4 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Longmont Times-Call’s John Fryar wrote two detailed stories on the GOP candidates running in the CD-2 primary this weekend, Boulder businessman Eric Weissmann running against state Sen. Kevin Lundberg of Berthoud. From his write-up on Sen. Lundberg:

His record is one of “holding the line on growth of government, and maintaining taxpayer-friendly policy,” he said.

Weissmann has accused Lundberg of devoting too much time to social issues, such as the senator’s outspoken views against abortion, same-sex marriages and civil unions. Lundberg denied that. He said his own examination of the bills and resolutions he’s introduced or carried shows that “the — quote — ‘social issues’ comprised less than about 5 percent.”

Lundberg said, “My focus has been on smaller government” and putting “more liberty in the hands of citizens.”

And from Fryar’s profile of Weissmann:

“I am running for Congress to get our economy moving, and for the federal government to be less expensive and less intrusive,” Weissmann said.

He wants to target the size and cost of federal government and how that’s contributed to a slumping national economy, he said.

“Those are the issues that I am about,” he said.

Weissmann contrasted his credentials with those of Kevin Lundberg, the state senator who’s also seeking to be the GOP standard-bearer in this fall’s 2nd Congressional District contest.

He called Lundberg “a career politician” who’s “been running for or serving in office since 1998.”

Our view: despite an openly expressed “Rule 11” preference for Eric Weissmann by kingmakers from the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), Weissmann has failed to eliminate Sen. Lundberg from contention, and is in no way guaranteed victory in next week’s primary. Weissmann has outraised Lundberg, but not by any kind of show-stopping degree–Weissmann just hasn’t demonstrated either the fundraising chops or willingness to self-fund to compete with deep-pocketed Democratic incumbent Rep. Jared Polis in the fall. It’s possible that Weissmann just doesn’t consider Lundberg to be a threat, but that could be great folly.

Because we’ve heard from numerous sources that Sen. Lundberg has been very energetically courting the evangelical Christian constituency in CD-2. This is a bloc of voters that could prove decisive, even dominant, in an under-the-radar late June primary. If Lundberg has been able to win these very reliable voters over, the challenge for Weissmann will be to to pull in enough moderate and/or nonreligious GOP voters to overcome them.

It’s definitely possible for Weissmann to do that, but we honestly thought the NRCC’s intervention over a month and a half ago would have had more of an impact than it has. If Lundberg wins this primary, it will be evidence either of resilient “Tea Party” strength we’ll be discussing long afterwards, or the same weakness we saw when national Republicans tried to push Jane Norton on skeptical GOP primary voters. Or both–they’re not mutually exclusive.

Comments

4 thoughts on “CD-2 GOP Primary a Bellwether Sleeper Race

  1. Considering that it doesn’t matter who wins the Republican primary, and that any Republican with half a brain realizes this, the race will be a contest among Republicans with somewhat less than half a brain. Ergo, flip a coin.

    1. There are only 8,000 more Democrats than Republicans in CD-2 after redistricting. Plus, the district is now more Larimer County than Boulder County. It’s a new ballgame for CD-2.

      If Weissmann wins, don’t doubt for a second that he’s going to give Polis a run for his money. He can match him dollar-for-dollar in self-funding, and he’s not a wingnut on social issues. Not only that, but Polis has negatives that can easily be exploited.

      It’s likely Polis still wins even if Weissmann beats Lundberg, but it’s not LOLZCD2GOP anymore.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!