U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 01, 2012 04:28 AM UTC

Tough Break For Rick Enstrom, The "Candy Man"

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Lynn Bartels of the Denver paper reports today on a serious development for another GOP Colorado House candidate, Rick Enstrom, after a mailer hit House District 23 mailboxes on Friday claiming Enstrom was “arrested for selling cocaine paraphernalia at his business.”

To briefly circle back, some of you may recall Rick Enstrom from his testimony in 2010 as a business owner against the repeal of certain business-facing tax credits, which Enstrom claimed could seriously hurt his business–only to confess later that he knew all along they would not, and of course they did not. That incident has left Enstrom with a bit of a credibility deficit.

Said credibility deficit becomes rather glaring when Enstrom threatens to sue, claiming that he was never arrested for the sale of drug paraphernalia, but the public record contains this:

That would be the Grand Junction Police Department report on Enstrom’s arrest.

“For sale of drug paraphernalia.”

Whatever becomes of this, the threats of “libel lawsuits” didn’t even survive the first news story.

With that established, there are a few issues to clear up. Enstrom is circulating a letter from an assistant Mesa County DA at the time, William Kain, claiming that Enstrom was never arrested. But Bartels notes the report you can plainly read above, and explains he was arrested after he refused to sign the summons, and was “released at the scene.” Although Kain was the prosecutor who signed the documents dismissing the case after Enstrom agreed to stop selling drug paraphernalia, news reports in the Grand Junction Sentinel at the time refer to another prosecutor, Peggy Ball, who was reportedly incensed by the decision to rule the evidence seized from Enstrom’s business inadmissible, and even threatened an appeal to the state Supreme Court:

Bottom line: this story is what it is. Back in the 1980s, according to unambiguous language in a police report, Rick Enstrom was arrested for selling drug paraphernalia. The fact is, many people will not regard running a head shop as a serious offense, and might even defend Enstrom’s right to sell legal products that might be used illegally outside his control. A quick drive down Federal Boulevard in Denver reveals that these products are widely and legally sold. The morality of selling immoral products in a free market is a germane but very broad topic.

One thing Enstrom can’t claim, however, is that it didn’t happen. If it’s politically problematic for a Republican candidate for the legislature to have been arrested in the 1980s for selling drug paraphernalia, too bad. The record doesn’t lie, no matter how you parse the words.

After the jump, two more supporting documents we were forwarded: the original Grand Junction Sentinel story detailing the citation for selling drug paraphernalia including “brown bottles and spoons [police] say are used for consuming cocaine,” as well as the settlement dismissing the case, where Enstrom personally acknowledges that “the sale of drug paraphernalia is adverse to the best interests of the community,” and agrees to stop doing it.

Once again, we’ll update when Frank McNulty explains what happened to his vetting process.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Tough Break For Rick Enstrom, The “Candy Man”

  1. I need to get told how this police report jives with the total bullshit at Colorado Peak Politics, thus making it not total bullshit. ArapaGOP? Clock and and gimme the skinny!

    As for the selling of drug paraphernalia, I want to make sure ArapaGOP addresses that too.

    Thanks in advance trolls!

        1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C

          Someone had to help accessorize the addicts so they could help support Ronnie’s illegal war south of the border.  I mean if you believe that stuff…


          Reagan Administration admits Contra-cocaine connections

          On April 17, 1986, the Reagan Administration released a three page report acknowledging that there were some Contra-cocaine connections in 1984 and 1985, arguing that these connections occurred at a time when the rebels were “particularly hard pressed for financial support” because U.S. aid had been cut off. The report admitted that “We have evidence of a limited number of incidents in which known drug traffickers have tried to establish connections with Nicaraguan resistance groups.” The report tried to downplay the drug activity, claiming that it took place “without the authorization of resistance leaders.”[8]

        2. There is a very important difference, idiot.

          Enstrom’s case was DISMISSED.

          Sal Pace was CONVICTED.

          If you don’t see a difference between those, please never enter an American courtroom. Innocent until proven guilty is how we do things here, at least until Democrats get their way.

          Again, wow. Are you sure that’s what you meant to say?

          1. On the one hand, both are very, very minor transgressions.

            On the other, Pace isn’t threatening to sue people over the truth, while this guy is.

            If you don’t see the difference there, it’s only because you’re paid not to acknowledge it.

  2. The real reason Enstrom is choking out lawsuit threats is he doesn’t want cocaine paraphernalia to be part of the campaign. Which it is now more than ever because he lied.

    That’s pretty damn stupid.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

65 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!