President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 20, 2023 02:38 PM UTC

In Which Right Wingers in Colorado Go Truly "Batshit" Crazy

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We took note last week of a proposal between the Colorado Republican Party and the Colorado Libertarian Party to “join forces” (sometimes) in an effort to prevent Democrats from continuing to win elections in Colorado. The idea stems from a belief among some politicos on both sides that Libertarian candidates — who have long been sort of the “Dollar Store version” of Colorado Republicans — are siphoning away votes from Republican candidates to the benefit of Democrats.

The math doesn’t really support this idea on a larger scale, but facts have never gotten in the way of complaints for right-wing voices in Colorado. In the 2022 race for Governor, for example, Republican Heidi Ganahl could have received ALL of the votes that went to Libertarian Party candidate [checks notes] Kevin Ruskusky, and Ganahl still would have lost the race by 19 points to Democrat Jared Polis. The situation was the same in the race for U.S. Senate, where Democrat Michael Bennet defeated Republican Joe O’Dea by a 56-41 margin, with Libertarian candidate Brian Peotter picking up less than 2% of the vote.

A “Republicertarian Alliance” might have changed the outcome in Congressional District 8, where Democrat Yadira Caraveo defeated Republican Barbara Kirkmeyer by 1,632 votes; Libertarian candidate Dan Ward received 9,280 votes, which theoretically could have swung the race in Kirkmeyer’s favor. Of course, there’s no guarantee that Ward voters might have instead been Kirkmeyer voters, or if they might have just left that race blank on their ballot.

Anyway, all of this talk about a “Republicertarian” alliance glosses over the bigger problem with the hardcore base in either political party: They’re too crazy to appeal to average voters in Colorado.

According to prominent Republicans and Libertarians, Colorado State University in Fort Collins is building out a bioweapons laboratory focused on bat research because, um, well…like most fantastical conspiracy theories, the “why” is less important than the “yarrghhhhh!!!”

As Kyle Clark of 9News noted on Twitter:

9News covered this manufactured conspiracy back in February, around the same time that the Rocky Mountain Collegian was reporting on the news of a $6.7 million federal grant for a new “Chiropteran Research Facility,” which is a complicated way of saying that CSU is building a new bat cave:

This summer a new construction project will begin at the Colorado State University Foothills Campus. With a $6.7 million grant from the National Institutes of Health, CSU is able to build the Chiropteran Research Facility, which will be a breeding space for bats to research viruses that have been theorized to have developed in the animals. According to Construction Journal, the design of the new building is a 14,000-square-foot, stand-alone bat vivarium.

“CSU researchers have safely studied and worked with bats and other vectors for over 30 years,” said Rebecca Moritz, CSU biosafety director. [Pols emphasis] “Due to global warming and population growth, humans and animals are coming into contact more frequently and in ways not previously seen. This could result in an increased number of outbreaks and possibly pandemics. The main purpose of this facility will be to house bat breeding colonies for CSU researchers and researchers around the United States and the world. This facility will allow an expansion of CSU’s current work, including projects focusing on the role that bats play in disease transmission and the development of vaccines and therapeutics.”

This center is an extension of the CSU Center for Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, which has been active on campus since the late 1970s. The new facility is projected to be completed by 2025, allowing students to conduct groundbreaking research in the next few years. [Pols emphasis]

“To the Qave!”

This may be big news to Heidi Ganahl and anti-vaxxers such as Pam Long, but CSU has been studying chiropteran bats in Fort Collins for 50 years now. It’s not a big secret.

Nevertheless, Ganahl focused an entire podcast episode on the subject back in May, in which she interviewed the head of a group called — and we’re not making this up –the Covid Bat Research Moratorium of Colorado (CBRMC). The idea that studying bats is tantamount to creating bioweapons is easy to sell to anti-vaxxers, who respond to any use of the phrase “gain-of-function research” as though someone had activated, well, a “bat signal.”

And what proof do any these folks have that would demonstrate that CSU is creating some sort of “COVID bats” in Fort Collins? They have no evidence, of course; they know it is true because the Internet told them all about it.

Substitute “COVID bats” for “kids dressed in cat costumes,” and you have basically the same silly story that put the final nail in the coffin of Ganahl’s 2022 gubernatorial campaign.

As you no doubt recall, Ganahl insisted for weeks — without providing any serious evidence — that school districts across the state were allowing kids to participate in classrooms while pretending to be cats, or something.

The reason Ganahl believed this nonsense is because some people on Facebook told her it was true. Colorado voters, understandably, decided not to allow Ganahl or her Facebook page anywhere near the levers of government.

People who say stuff like this tend to have a hard time winning elections…no matter how many Libertarians are involved. Colorado voters generally worry less about bat research and more about roads, schools, and preserving basic freedoms. As Colorado Democratic Party Chairman Shad Murib told Colorado Newsline when asked about the “Republicertarian Alliance” last week:

“The Colorado Republican Party’s problem is not Libertarians spoiling elections for them – their problem is that their platform is opposed by the vast majority of Colorado voters. If their path to victory is to embrace folks who are even more extreme than then, I’d remind them that two wrongs don’t make a right.”

Two wrongs don’t make a right, but two “rights” make up a bunch of other nonsense. No “Republicertarian Alliance” will accomplish squat in Colorado until they solve that problem.

Comments

12 thoughts on “In Which Right Wingers in Colorado Go Truly “Batshit” Crazy

  1. It's also like Colorado Republicans are fighting the last war wrt Libertarians "siphoning" votes from them.  Even if they could have won CD8 with no Libertarian on the ballot, Congresswoman Caraveo is going to have the advantage of incumbency going forward.

    1. Consolidating the votes of the most extreme rightwing sliver of less than 1% of Colorado voters with the libertarians is very small ball and a waste of time. Publicly feuding with your enemies in your same party is just plain dumb and not a good look. "Deliberately slow walking fundraising" is very thin cover for the fact that you can't fundraise. 

      Dave Williams should be appointed Colorado Republican party chair for life…

    2. At the beginning of June, 2023, the Secretary of State's count of  active registered voters statewide showed 39,830 Libertarians, 931,705 Republicans, 1,054,706 Democrats, and 1,801,956 Unaffiliated.  Libertarians were just over 1% of active registrations, so I don't think they will hold the key to victory in any broad race. Assuming no change in trend, Republicans will have lost another 15,000 registrations and at least 1% share of active registered voters.

      And in 2024, there will be higher voting participation among the Unaffiliated, which in other races seemed to be break about 55-25 Democrat-Republican, with the other 20% voting a variety of other parties, not voting in down-ballot races, or adding a write-in candidate (including some who lost major party primaries).

       

    1. A perfect segue: 

      The Devil Is the Details

      The issue that hangs over the GOP primary like the Grim Reaper is that Trump personifies the flight from detail, the triumph of wide brushism. He exacerbates already-existing rightist pathologies. Republicans who embrace him are like cancer patients inhaling asbestos: It ain’t gonna help, and it will hurt.

      But unlike the cancer patient analogy, you’ll be hurting more than just yourself.

      Keep that in mind as you don your pith helmet for your big Moloch hunt.

       

      1. That was a fun read. It's also why I would like at least one interviewer refuse to gloss over things that Trump says. I know interviewer have topics they want to get through in a short amount of time but we need to stop letting Trump gloss over things and invite him explain himself.

        If Trump mentions that "the 2020 election was RIGGED" as he often does, then ask follow up questions until he provides answers or refuses to answer them (ie. Why do you believe this? What proof do you have and when can you show it to us? If you believe this, why are you running for office? etc.)  then summarize what he told you (ie. So you claim the election is rigged and you have proof but you have no idea what that is and can't show it to us). 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!