President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 14, 2023 12:30 PM UTC

Boebert Emerges as Face of Ridiculous Military Funding Bill

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
“W-w-w-woke”

We wrote on Thursday about Colorado Democrats’ opposition to Congressional Republicans holding military funding hostage for a variety of pet causes. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) has been refusing to approve Department of Defense (DoD) reprogramming requests — which significantly impact many service members in Colorado — as part of an effort to ensure that Space Command HQ moves from Colorado Springs to Alabama. At the same time, Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) has been holding up military promotions for months because he thinks white supremacists are being treated unfairly.

Late Thursday and into Friday, the action was on the floor of the House of Representatives for a critical vote on approving annual military funding via the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). As POLITICO explains, Republicans stuffed the NDAA with reams of nonsense social issue complaints before narrowly passing a bill that is already DOA in the U.S. Senate:

House Republicans united to narrowly pass major defense policy legislation on Friday that restricts the Pentagon policies on abortion access, medical care for transgender troops and diversity in a narrow vote.

But the many culture war provisions Republicans packed into the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act to win conservative votes are doomed in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

The 219-210 vote on Friday saw all but four Democrats oppose the bill, which authorizes a national defense budget of $886 billion for fiscal 2024. Conversely, only four Republicans opposed the measure as Speaker Kevin McCarthy held his conference together to clear the legislation.

“I take solace in the fact that this is not going to become law and we have an opportunity to correct it,” said Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.), the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, of the path forward. “But it’s really very disturbing how divisive all this has become, the degree to which the Republican majority wants to attack diversity. Bottom line. Attack trans people. Attack women. Attack people of color.”

The typically bipartisan bill dissolved into a nearly GOP-only measure Thursday as ugly fights over abortion, transgender medical care and diversity programs that have shown up in other bills in the House took center stage. As the rightward tilt became clear on the House floor, Smith and other Democrats who had previously supported the NDAA in the Armed Services Committee derided the revamped bill as “an ode to bigotry and ignorance.” [Pols emphasis]

Included in the NDAA, which is supposed to just be about military funding approval, were a litany of right-wing grievances, including:

Eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and staff in the DoD;

♦ Prohibiting the reimbursement of expenses related to abortion services;

♦ Prohibiting health care programs for service members from covering hormone treatments and gender confirmation surgeries;

♦ And providing for the reinstatement of service members who were discharged for refusing to receive COVID-19 vaccinations.

Also added to the NDAA was an amendment sponsored by Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-ifle) to ban certain books from school libraries on military bases and other facilities. 

 

Here’s Boebert yammering about her amendment late Thursday:

My colleagues on the other side of the aisle will mischaracterize this amendment as extreme. All the while, the Biden administration has spent the last two years promoting radical gender ideology to impressionable young children in K-12 schools throughout our country, including our military schools. Now THAT’S extreme… 

…I don’t send my boys to school to receive indoctrination from the woke mob or to be sexualized by groomers. And the same can be said for our service members, who are also parents sending their children to DODEA schools.

Woke grooming!!!

Boebert listed off six different books that she finds to be particularly bad: “All Boys Aren’t Blue”; “This Book is Gay”; “Gender Queer”; “Middle School is a Drag”; “Some Girls Bind”; and “Julian is a Mermaid.” The latter example is particularly silly, considering that the story is about a boy who wants to be a mermaid — something Boebert theoretically understands is not a real thing.

Pennsylvania Democrat Chrissy Houlahan — a former teacher and herself a former student of military schools as a child — then rose to oppose Boebert’s amendment:

“My colleagues on the other side of the aisle like to say that they are for individual rights and freedoms. But it is perhaps more accurate to say that some of them want the individual right to deny OTHER people and OTHER families their rights and freedoms as well.”

Houlahan also warned that Boebert’s amendment is so overly-broad that it could eventually lead to banning childhood staples such as Judy Blume’s beloved book, “Are You There God, It’s Me, Margaret.”

[mantra-pullquote align=”center” textalign=”left” width=”90%”]“Extreme MAGA Republicans have chosen to hijack the historically bipartisan National Defense Authorization Act to continue attacking reproductive freedom and jamming their right-wing ideology down the throats of the American people.

“House Republicans have turned what should be a meaningful investment in our men and women in uniform into an extreme and reckless legislative joyride.”

— Statement from House Democratic Caucus[/mantra-pullquote]

 

For some inexplicable reason, House Republicans then decided to let Boebert take center stage on the NDAA debate and during the subsequent gloating press conference. Here’s what Boebert had to say during today’s presser:

“We dealt a major blow to the Biden regime’s efforts to politicize our military by defunding his policy of using DOD funds to traffic service members out of red states so that they can receive taxpayer-funded abortions.”

Sure. You dealt a “major blow” by narrowly passing a bill that is going nowhere in the U.S. Senate and will just have to be renegotiated at the expense of military families worldwide. Congratulations!

If you’re standing with Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), you’re in the wrong line.

Boebert continued by PRAISING SENATOR TOMMY TUBERVILLE, who made headlines earlier this week for his crusade in defense of white supremacists

“The conservative movement is getting fired up everywhere. Just look at what is happening over in the Senate. Senator Tuberville is dealing devastating blows to the Biden regime’s woke military agenda.”

Whaaaaaa???

You’re really going to defend a guy who has spent months holding up military promotions because he thinks white supremacists are being treated unfairly by the DoD?

In short, Lauren Boebert spent her week in Congress trying to ban books and backing a Republican Senator who has chosen to die on a political hill in support of white supremacists. This is not what voters in CO-03 want Boebert to be doing, but she just can’t help herself.

Comments

12 thoughts on “Boebert Emerges as Face of Ridiculous Military Funding Bill

  1. FFS. If they're gonna go this route, House Republicans may as well hold on to these amendments and apply them to every proposed bill.

    It's like adding "…in bed" to the end of reading my fortune cookie but instead it's adding "… and does not encourage inclusivity of any kind and does not fund abortions or gender affirming care" to every bill.

    If we're gonna add this to military funding bills, we might as well add it to all the bills just in case. Transportation bills? Amend it! Parks funding? Amend it! Law enforcement bills? Amend it! Improving Access to Small Business Information Act? Amend it? 250th Anniversary of the United States Marine Corps Commemorative Coin Act? Amend it!

    1. We should also feel free to address her as "honey" on the House floor, cuz decorum only makes people feel a sense of inclusion and things that promote inclusion are bad. In fact, MTG calling Boebert a "little bitch" was just normal, everyday conversation (This is all spiteful, petty sarcasm).

  2. I miss the good old days when it was "Heather Has Two Mommies" and "Daddy's Roommate" that was sending these screwballs over the edge.

  3. I do wish what passes for Grand Junction’s media would learn to mention that her shit is going nowhere in the Senate.

    Being the rookie reporters they are, GJ’s teevee stations “report” her news releases as bona fide developments. 

    The Sentinel should know better.

     

  4. I for one am absolutely thrilled and tickled that the GOP would put forward someone from Colorado with Boebsie’s obvious intellectual heft as their spokesmodel.

  5. Sen Tuberville began his effort to block promotions to protest the military's decision to allow military troops to access reproductive care of abortions.  Never mind that Biden won his election & his Sec of Defense was confirmed — Tuberville, who never served, appears to think he knows what military personnel need. Last I saw, he's now blocking consent for 265+ promotions.  If his intransigence lingers, "More than 600 senior officers may be affected by the end of the year." Impacts include:

     * some positions require confirmation to a rank in order to serve and handle all functions.  The Acting Commandant of the Marine Corps cannot start policy reviews or issue new doctrine. [Nor can he and his family move into the Commandant's quarters].

     * no promotions or confirmations to particular posts means the officer's families are not eligible to move.  So much for kids getting to start their school year where they THOUGHT they would go.

     * no promotions means no pay increase or time in grade to make officers eligible for future promotions. Washington Post says "the promotion backlog will make it harder to persuade junior officers to remain in uniform — something the US can ill afford amid recruiting shortfalls."

    I'm sure there are others …

    Unable to win on the issues by way of election to the White House and sufficient majorities in Congress, Republicans are now trying to force their way by a single Senator holding the military hostage or by having a single judge issue injunctions.   Here's hoping Democrats have learned their lessons about negotiating with terrorists unwilling to compromise within normal processes of government.

     

    1. Republicans: We trust and support our military members to keep our country safe and fight for "freedom"!

      Also Republicans: We can't trust our military members to know how to keep our country safe as long as they have the ability to have inclusion programs and cover health issues that may be experienced by military members and their families that we dislike so we will explicitly tell the DoD what they can and cannot spend that money on because we know better than they do.

  6. Huh … I didn't expect this: the final NDAA vote, for passage, had four Republicans who voted against the legislation:  Ken Buck of Colorado,  Andy Biggs of Arizona, Eli Crane of Arizona, and Thomas Massie of Kentucky.

    Press Release  July 14, 2023

    WASHINGTON — Congressman Ken Buck (CO-04) released the following statement regarding his vote against the National Defense Authorization Act

    “Today, I voted against the NDAA for one simple reason: spending. While I fully support funding our national defense and agree with several amendments to this bill, I cannot in good conscience vote for its $875.4 billion price tag. Our country is careening toward fiscal ruin, and Congress continues to turn a blind eye by passing these massive spending packages with no attention to their cost or efficacy.

    “The Department of Defense has failed five financial audits in a row. In November 2022, it was reported that the DOD failed to account for 61% of its $3.5 trillion in assets. This is not acceptable. Congress must get serious about the waste, fraud, and abuse at the DOD and cut unnecessary programs.”

  7. These are the same people who threw a hissy fit in ’49 when they did away with the segregated service units. I remember my father talking about it and how damned silly he thought they were.  And Buck only gets half credit. He did the right thing–but for the wrong reason.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

121 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!