U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 26, 2023 12:24 AM UTC

Unserious Lawyers Charged With Serious Crimes: Dan Caplis' Praise of Jenna Ellis & Trump's Legal Team

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Erik Maulbetsch

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Dan Caplis and (according to Dan), “some of the greatest legal talent in American history.”

Dan Caplis is a serious lawyer, or so he says. So serious, in fact, that he’s trademarked the phrase, “a serious firm for serious cases.” Jenna Ellis is not a serious lawyer, but she has been charged with serious crimes. She also admitted, in her formal censure by Colorado’s Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, to spreading misinformation about the 2020 election no fewer than ten times, including on Dan Caplis’ KNUS radio show.

And yet, following the charges in Georgia filed against Ellis, John Eastman, and the rest of Trump’s legal team for trying to overturn the 2020 election, Caplis took to the airwaves last week to claim he never liked their legal strategy.

“Those who say that the Democrat D.A. in Georgia is trying to criminalize political disagreement, trying to make it illegal to contest an election, at least for a Republican to contest in election, those people are right, in my opinion,” said Caplis. “While I never agreed with that political strategy, and I always thought the legal theory was way way way off and wrong — and I said so on air— it shouldn’t be illegal to make those arguments.”

These days Caplis says he believes President Biden “won a very close election over President Trump,” and that he hasn’t seen proof that the election was stolen. Back in 2020, however, Caplis was an enthusiastic advocate of Ellis and the Trump legal team.

Caplis had Ellis as a guest on his show numerous times following the 2020 election. During each appearance he showered her with praise while repeating the underlying demand of Ellis, Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Sidney Powell, and the rest of the Trump legal team: slow down the electoral process; we need more time to investigate allegations of fraud.

In reviewing their on-air conversations (as well as the false statements for which Ellis was censured, the difference between Ellis’s and Caplis’s claims about election fraud come down to a matter of certainty. Ellis flat-out said the election was stolen, while Caplis, even while asserting there was “substantial fraud” always framed his statements as merely “asking questions.”

While he may have expressed doubts later on, in days and weeks after the 2020 election, Caplis was an enthusiastic supporter of team Trump and their strategy. Here he is on November 7, 2020:

“In my view, those who would walk away from this fight, walk away from the very legitimate question as to whether this election is being stolen,” said Caplis. “Those people should not hold high positions, be they in the Republican Party, be they in the Democratic Party, be they in elective office, Because the question on the table right now is so legitimate, it’s so important. And for the good of America long term, for the good of both parties, it must be sorted out now… But the reality is there are so many legitimate reasons to be suspicious about whether this election was stolen that it would be irresponsible to move forward at this point without answering those questions…

“So you start with the reasonable suspicion and then you determine that because this reasonable suspicion exists, there should be a full opportunity to investigate. Any reasonable person should agree to that. A full opportunity to investigate. And that has two components: time and access. So there must be the time necessary with all due diligence, to dive in right now and fully investigate in each of these key states. And what you’re investigating in each state will be different from state to state based upon the issues that create the suspicion to begin with, but you need the time and you need the means to investigate. And then in the end, if you decide, you meaning the Republican Party and the Trump campaign, if you believe you have the info necessary, the information that justifies changing the outcome, then a court gets to decide that.”

Two weeks later, the day after Ellis joined Giuliani and Powell for an absurd press conference alleging election fraud that was immediately debunked by major media outlets, Caplis invited her on his show and again insisted there was fraud:

”One of the reasons the left is freaking out right now is it starts with the fact that they know there was- obviously there was fraud. The question is whether it’s widespread enough to change the outcome. They know with each passing day there will be more whistleblowers, there will be more solid, provable evidence of fraud.”

Caplis then concluded the interview by showering Ellis with praise.

“Jenna, you have been so impressive. You are so calm, cool, precise, focused today. I hope that as this gets into courtrooms, I hope that you become the leader of the [Trump] team,” said Caplis on air. “Because it is moments like this where some of the greatest legal talent in American history has had a chance to show itself. And boy, I would love to see you at the tip of the spear. I’m grateful for the time this afternoon and keep up the great work. https://ctr-aws.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Caplis.Ellis_.Tip_.Spear_11.20.20.mp4

Three weeks later on Dec. 7, Ellis was back in studio to spread more misinformation about the election. When a Colorado judge censured her earlier this year for dishonesty, the court listed ten “misrepresentations” for which she was being reprimanded. One was a tweet she wrote summarizing a Dec. 22, 2020 on-air interview with Caplis.

That interview, like the previous one ended with Caplis praising Ellis. This time he claimed she was literally the best lawyer in America.

“As I’ve said to people for many months now, there is not a better, more effective advocate for this president in America than you,” said Caplis. “In the last time I checked, I’ve only been practicing law for about 37 years. I always thought your ability to advocate for your client was a pretty big part of being a world-class lawyer, and I can’t imagine him having a better advocate than you.” https://ctr-aws.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Caplis.Ellis_.Best_.Lawyer_12.7.20.mp4

Ellis wasn’t the only Trump legal team member Caplis held in high esteem, although admittedly with more reservation:

“If somebody wants to call question Sidney Powell’s credibility, whatever,” said Caplis. “I don’t claim to be a Sidney Powell expert, but from the research I’ve been able to do so far- A former federal prosecutor who has handled a lot of appeals in federal court, Michael Flynn’s attorney, etc.. I haven’t seen anything that would suggest to me that Sidney Powell is some kind of wingnut or anything… By all accounts, she’s been a serious person involved in serious cases. No sane person would make the kind of allegation she’s making as publicly and as precisely as she’s making those unless they truly believed it and believe they could prove it, because otherwise they’d be a laughing stock until their dying day, and then their family name would be a laughing stock and there would be the fear of being sued.”

Three days later, CNN ran this story about Powell: “Donald Trump finally found someone with a too-crazy conspiracy theory about the 2020 election.”

To be fair, Sydney Powell isn’t just being charged with election-related felonies, she is, as Caplis predicted, also being sued. In March, 2021, she offered this defense as a reason to dismiss Dominion Voting System’s lawsuit against her: “No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact.”

Caplis did not respond to an email inquiry as to whether he had any regrets about praising Ellis and the Trump legal team, particularly in light of Ellis’ admission to the Colorado Bar Association that she spread misinformation. The Colorado Times Recorder also asked for any examples of Caplis criticizing the Trump campaign’s political or legal strategy on air between the 2020 election and January 20, 2021. This piece will be updated with any response received. This news analysis column first appeared in the Colorado Times Recorder.

Comments

8 thoughts on “Unserious Lawyers Charged With Serious Crimes: Dan Caplis’ Praise of Jenna Ellis & Trump’s Legal Team

  1. Mr. Caplis appears to overlook the fact that common sense Republicans moved on a long time ago from the Trump Turd and all his MAGA b.s. In fact, a lot of Rs were never on the Trump ship to begin with.

  2. The Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel concluded:

    Jenna Ellis has been publicly censured through a stipulation to attorney discipline agreed to by the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel and approved by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge. Through the stipulation, Ms. Ellis agreed that she violated Colo. RPC 8.4(c), which prohibits reckless, knowing, or intentional misrepresentations by attorneys. She violated this rule when, as counsel to then President Trump and the Trump campaign, she made a number of public statements about the November 2020 presidential election that were false. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge also has issued an opinion in this matter.

    The public censure in this matter reinforces that even if engaged in political speech, there is a line attorneys cannot cross, particularly when they are speaking in a representative capacity.

    Shouldn't there be some consequence to another lawyer providing a public forum, praising an attorney for the specific statements that served as a basis for the discipline, and making separate factual statements about the election that echo the ones censured? 

    1. A question might be in regard to who would have standing to file a complaint against Mr. Caplis.

      I suspect that average citizens like us; assuming you're an average citizen; would not have standing. There also is a freedom of speech issue. Still, you raise an interesting thought line. Too bad Voyageur is no longer with us as he might have some advice here.

      1. I'm so average a citizen, I can blend into nearly ANY crowd.

        "Standing" would be appropriate for issues of discipline that might result in redressing a personal wrong.  As best I can see, "attorney discipline" is assumed to be a matter of ethics, and can be reported by anyone willing to identify themselves as a complainant.  Details, including methods to contact the Office, are at:

        https://www.coloradosupremecourt.com/Complaints/File_ComplaintAgainstAtty.asp

        1. Anyone can report an attorney to OARC.  OARC will conduct an initial investigation and if warranted pursue it further.  Since OARC regulates attorneys and does so for the good of and protection of the public (in theory), you don't need standing as you would in a lawsuit.  So anyone could file a complaint with OARC about Caplis.  But based on the above, I don't see any conduct by Caplis that would subject him to discipline.  It's all protected by the First Amendment and I don't see any evidence that Caplis participated in the election fraud issues and cases like Ellis did.  Caplis is a giant POS, and a mediocre attorney, but I don't think there's anything here that would subject him to discipline by OARC.  

  3.  “While I never agreed with that political strategy, and I always thought the legal theory was way way way off and wrong — and I said so on air— it shouldn’t be illegal to make those arguments.”

    No one is saying it's illegal to make those arguments. Trump is charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States by arranging to have fake electoral college ballots sent to Congress.

    1. Precisely — Trump can talk about it all he wants — it was his actions and of those who followed his orders for which he is being prosecuted. 

      1. Funny  how the right eing “news” talkers never mention the conspiracy’s criminal actions when they’re blathering on about “free speech”.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

70 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!