President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 11, 2011 08:50 PM UTC

Hancock's First Run-Off Ad

  • 0 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

We’re glad that Michael Hancock made his way into the run-off, if only because that means we get to watch more of his TV advertisements. We’ve noted time and time again that Hancock is really making the most of the medium, so we had high hopes for his newest advertisement, the first of his race against Chris Romer.

We like this ad. It displays that same visual unity that Hancock took advantage of in round one, and the production value leaves little to be desired. Even if Hancock loses the race, whoever he hired to do his television advertisements can be proud of a job well done.  

What we really liked about Hancock’s previous spots is that they did an admirable job of introducing him as a candidate. To us, they helped make Michael Hancock memorable. Hancock’s got a great story and we think he can benefit by personalizing himself. In light of expected attacks from the Romer camp, Hancock’s best bet may indeed be to introduce himself to the electorate before and after Romer frames the dialogue.

The main issue with this particular advertisement is that it focuses too much on what Hancock’s accomplished. Or rather, what other people have accomplished because of Michael Hancock. Unfortunately, it doesn’t do a great job of connecting these stories with the candidate. We assume that Hancock did something that helped Tamara save her business or got Chris out of his dead end job. We were able to draw those connections because we know enough about Michael to know what he’s done, but we think that message may be lost on those who don’t know him all too well yet. Put simply, there’s just too much packed into a thirty second advertisement.

And what’s with that music, anyway? It sounds like something out of a Lifetime movie or maybe a Stephen King miniseries at best. We guess that’s alright. The Langoliers was pretty gripping.  

Comments

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

163 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!