U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 26, 2014 12:50 PM UTC

2014 Will Not Be a "Wave Election"

  • 25 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Bush wave
No, not that kind of wave.

Our friends at "The Fix" produced an interesting list today titled, "The 10 Things We Know 10 Weeks Before Election Day." While there are several interesting points on the list, the one that stood out most to us is #2:

This isn't a wave election. Yet.  The last two midterm elections — 2006 and 2010 — were waves, elections totally dominated by the national issue environment to the detriment of individual candidates trying to swim against the tide. (Terrible water metaphor alert!) That doesn't look like it's happening just yet.  The generic Congressional ballot — "if the election were held today would you prefer a Republican or Democratic controlled Congress?" — shows Democrats with a narrow one-point edge, a far cry from the five point (and building) margin that Republicans had at this time in the 2010 election. And, in Senate races, candidates like Mark Pryor (Ark.) and Mark Begich (Alaska) are hanging in races that, if the national environment was worse, would already be lost.

It has been awhile since we heard much talk about another midterm "wave election" similar to the 2010 version that gave Republicans control of the U.S. House of Representatives. Earlier this year, Republicans were giddy about the prospect of another wave that could enable them to pick up the Senate in 2014, but this election cycle looks and feels much different than 2010. Remember how much media coverage was given to Congressional town hall meetings in August of that year? Republicans may be more excited about the election than Democrats in general, but 2014 definitely does not have the same political fervor that enveloped 2010.

It's also worth noting that the 2010 national wave was significantly less impactful for Republicans here in Colorado. While Cory Gardner and Scott Tipton did capture seats held by Democrats (Rep. Betsy Markey and Rep. John Salazar, respectively), both CD-4 and CD-3 were not what any political handicapper would have called Democratic seats; Gardner and Tipton essentially won back seats that the GOP should have held anyway. In the 2010 Senate race, first-time candidate Michael Bennet defeated Republican Ken Buck in a race that Buck could have — and some say should have — won for Republicans. In CD-7, incumbent Democratic Rep. Ed Perlmutter absolutely destroyed GOP challenger Ryan Frazier, winning re-election by a 12-point margin.

"The Fix" hedges their bet about 2014 by saying that this "not yet" a wave election, but the "not yet" is unnecessary. If 2014 was indeed shaping up to be a "wave election," we would already be feeling it by now.

Comments

25 thoughts on “2014 Will Not Be a “Wave Election”

  1. If Markey and Salazar were smart then they both could've founds ways to be re-elected. My advice would've been to listen to Harry Truman's advice from so long ago that is still relevant today. IMHO, they both were towers of pudding and triangulated themselves out of a job. Salazar even got caught pretending he wasn't a Democrat in an amazing video filmed by a democratic activist in DC. Way to go, John!

    1. He also was so complacent (some felt lazy was the word for it at the time) that he didn't really get out there and work at getting reelected until very late.

  2. Markey is targeting

    • retirees – (her oppponent wants to gut PERA, she wants to maintain it)
    • working people (folks resent Stapleton's lack of a work ethic, want the Treasurer to seek economic benefits for Colorado)
    • public in general, who want a non-partisan, professional Treasurer

    She shouldn't be too partisan – that's not the way for her to win. Professionalism and competence is.

      1. Zap, I would liked for Markey to have kept that seat, too, but it is a pretty solidly red district and we owe her a debt of gratitude for prying Muskrat's sorry carcass out of it. Better luck this time.

  3. Until and unless the GOTP morphs into a sane, rational political entity completely unrecognizable from the debased, deranged, unhinged, nihilistic, racist, reactionary, hypocritical, power-mad, plutocratic, regressive, morally, culturally, spiritually and ethically bankrupt cabal it is today, it has most likely seen the last "wave" it ever will.

    1. I think that just about covers  them, DP. From your lips to the elecotate's ears. We need to buttonhole every wishy-washy unaffilated voter we can find with exactly that message

        1. Even if they do quite well in 2014 due to a challenging senatorial election map for Dems, demographics are  coming to overwhelm them, eventually to overwhelm many gerrymandered districts in southwestern states.

          They've already lost their ability to win a national election. They'll never elect enough Senators to override a Dem President's veto and until they take their party back from the extremists who run it now, including those laughingly called moderate, they aren't going to have a GOTP President to sign legislation or a GOTP 60 vote block in the Senate (if they get a whisper thin majority there in 2014 they'll lose it in 2016) to get legislation even that far. They aren't going to be able to get anymore conservatives onto the Supreme Court without a Republican in the WH either. 

          Not saying there's nothing to worry about but remembering the positives too is good for the blood pressure. Also a big cleansing breath or two.wink

    1. Please do bet your very last dollar on such an unlikely outcome, and keep placing your unquestioning faith in the RCP B.S. parade. Nothing would make us happier — at least until election day itself.

      1. Republicans will take back the Senate this year. Obama will end his failed presidency with Congress united against him.

        It's not an unlikely outcome, even Nate Silver predicts it.

        1. You might get 50, maybe 51 seats. No more. And I don't give a rat's rump what Silver (who has been far from infallible) says. You want reliable prognostication, it's Sam Wang or nothing.

          1. i AGREE. Doesn't idiot Andrew realize you ain't getting any right wing legidlation passed if you don't have a republican in the white house and good luck with that Andrew. You right wingers wont be winning the white house anytime soon LOL

        2. Not exactly. You need to read things all the way through, modster.

          Even if Rs do take a bare majority (Nate isn't positing that as a given just yet) in the Senate they won't have the 60 votes they'll need just to get legislation to Obama's veto pen. It would, if it happens, probably set them up for a big fall in 2016 when Dems will have the advantage in a presidential year election with Rs even more poorly positioned, thanks to demographics, to take the WH.

          1. I don't know, I think that 2010 is the start of a 'permanent conservative majority,' followed in 2012 by the Righteos Landslide the Deposed the Usurper and began the thousand-year reign of King Mitt the Just-A-Normal-American-Guy & Queen Anne, dotted on by his loyal Turd Blossam who out it all in motion years before when he sent the Brooke Brother Boys to Florida for the Coup.  

        3. And republicans will lose the SENATE AND WHITE HOUSE AGAIN 2 YEARS LATER. What's your point moron Andrew? The GOP's failed policies WILL NEVER BECOME LAW. 😉

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

84 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!