(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Rep. Cory Gardner continues to misrepresent his record on immigration, and reporters have failed to call him out on it.
During an Oct. 6 debate, Gardner was asked if he'd vote for the DREAM Act, which would grant a path to citizenship for young undocumented immigrants who attend college or serve in the U.S. military.
Instead of answering the question, Gardner used the dodge tactic of stating his opinion on what will happen to the DREAM Act.
"Ultimately, I think the Dream Act will be part of the solution of immigration reform," Gardner said. "It has to be. Look, I believe in immigration reform."
If Gardner had answered the question, instead of predicting the future, he'd have said that he's long opposed the Dream Act.
Gardner: "I think if you pass the DREAM Act today, you’re still not fixing the problem,’ Gardner told the Boulder Daily Camera last year. "I want to create a fair system so people who want to be here legally can be here legally.”
Last year, Gardner even opposed a proposed state law, so-called ASSET, to grant in-state tuition for young immigrants in Colorado.
Gardner: "But we can’t start putting in place in-state tuition, whether it’s other things that are being placed by the states, without actually addressing the root problem that will only continue more illegal immigration into this country," Gardner told KNUS' Steve Kelly last year." And so, that’s why we’ve got to have a policy that actually works, and I believe it starts with border security."
On this very day, as I type this blog post, Gardner's website states that the Congressman opposes "giving those people [who are here illegally] benefits that will only encourage more illegal immigration."
In a similar vein, Gardner likes to say, "I strongly support immigration reform."
But Gardner was one of 30 House Republicans who openly opposed House Speaker John Boehner's immigration principles, intended to begin the embryonic stage of the process of moving immigration legislation out of the House.
Asked directly by Fox 31 Denver's Eli Stokols if he went to House Speaker Boehner and urged him to move the bipartisan Senate immigration bill or some other bill, Gardner again did not answer the question, saying that the Senate doesn't have a "monopoly of good ideas."
If he'd answered the question, he'd have said that he joined House Republicans in blocking Boehner and thereby ending hope for immigration reform last year.
Denver Post's Joey Bunchreported last week that Gardner has "long held he doesn't support providing amnesty to those here illegally."
Reporters need to pin Gardner down on what he supports now and what he's done about it. Otherwise, he gets to present himself as if he's for reform while he done nothing to advance reform.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
At the Pueblo debate, every time Gardner was asked about his position on immigration reform, he attacked Udall's 2005 vote for an immigration bill which would have made illegal immigration a felony.
I think Gardner voted for a similar bill in the House- will check.
So all Gardner has is pivot, attack. Pivot, attack. Deflect, pivot, attack. It's annoying.
This is why most Latinos hate Cory Gardner, and will cock-block him politically.
The follow-up question Gardner needs to be asked is,
Congresman, how many more billions of dollars do you support to seal off the border with Mexico — and the border with Canada. Whom will you tax to get the money?
Based on his responses in tonight's debate, I'm guessing he'd see he'd free up some money being used by the CDC for Jazzercise and gardens . . .
He's an insult to human intelligence.