(Discuss – Promoted by Colorado Pols)
As Colorado Pols continues to scour the election results for positive data points from a mediocre result they continue to miss the larger issue from last Tuesday's electoral dysfunction: Democrats did not have a coherent message to run on nor candidates that could create one of their own.
The most glaring example of this and the latest victim of ignoring Harry Truman is Mark Udall:
What about Mark Udall in Colorado, another Democrat who lost in a purple state that Obama carried? Udall built his campaign narrative around a war on women by his opponent Rep. Cory Gardner. He, like Braley, ticked off a list of progressive issues — from minimum wage to pay equity to protecting Social Security — without providing any framing story to link them together. He left out who the villains are in the story.
Udall also committed the ultimate narrative sin: delivering your opponent's story. Here's the closing line of a Udall ad: "I'm Mark Udall. No one — not government, not Washington — should have the power to take those rights and freedoms away." Voters who wanted the anti-government candidate chose the real thing!
Udall would have had a much broader audience for his "war on women" message if he framed it as part of a broader war on American families by the rich and powerful. It is easy to make opposition to pay equity or a woman's right to make her own decisions part of this broader story, which speaks to Americans' deep concerns about their families.
Yeah, I complained about it in real time, yet Udall continued tilting at economicwindmills built by Republicans:
There have been some important polls regarding Social Security lately. The views of the American People contradict the fiscal falsehoods on your Official Senate Website and show a significant level of disagreement with your conclusions regarding the best way to strengthen Social Security.
You don't think we should raise taxes on America's most wealthy to extend and strengthen Social Security. American Citizens say we should.
I suggest you take some of these polls into account when you're deciding whether or not to be on Squack Box the next time they need someone to lie about Social Security.
- Social Security – Polling Report Poll conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate Communications. Aug. 16-20, 2012. N=1,006 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3.9.
- Poll: Don't cut Social Security – Associated Press – POLITICO.com – Most Americans say go ahead and raise taxes if it will save Social Security benefits for future generations. And raise the retirement age, if you …
- State Social Security Polls | Strengthen Social Security
- Social Security – When you retire, how much do you expect to rely on Social Security — as your main source of income, as a minor source of income, or not at all? Do you think the …
- Social Security Institute Only 21% Say U.S. Government Has Consent of the Governed
- Poll: Raise taxes to save Social Security – AMERICAblog One of America's most influential progressive political blogs, providing news analysis of US politics, by John Aravosis in Washington DC.
- The Polls: Social Security by ROBERT Y. SHAPIRO AND TOM W. SMITH. We put those payroll contributions there so as to give the contributors a legal, moral, and …
If you want to see a budget that fits longstanding Democratic principles and has the support of majorities of Americans, you should check out The People's Budget that was designed by The Progressive Caucus (I think Jared Polis is a member, but I can't be sure), or the ideas found within Prosperity Economics that are gaining supporters as more Americans realize the policy of Austerity does not work, Trickle Down hasn't and will never work, and pandering politicians like you who want to codify the failures of Bush Economics are guaranteeing the demise of the Middle Class as they smile and lie their way through TV interviews.
Your continuing insistence on reciting false data and unneeded "fixes" to Social Security is a disservice to the citizens of Colorado.
Udall used every platform at his disposal to push economic falsehoods while following the Blue Dog, Third Way playbook. The Blue Dogs continued their losing streak while progressive Dems who supported progressive policies won. And right on cue the remaining Senate Democrats move closer to their Republican friends across the aisle.
What's the elephant in the room? Democrats keep trying to compromise with people who do not want to compromise. The last few years, Republicans have found a way to win by losing 2 presidential elections. And now they are claiming a mandate after ignoring the mandate won by Barack Obama only two years ago. Democrats' guiding principle has become bipartisanship for the sake of bipartisanship to the exclusion of any faith to core democratic principles or the accomplishments and lessons of their most successful predecessors.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Suckered us in with Harry Truman.
ok I'll shut up for a while……….
Udall promoted the Simpson-Bowles proposal during his Lakewood appearance with Bill Clinton. Crickets from the audience.
Andrew Romanoff started his campaign with a commercial endorsing a Balanced Budget Constitutional Amendment(!) I never heard him repeat that at a campaign event. I'd love the opportunity to ask him in person whether he actually believes that.
The coherent message? What are Republicans going to do for 2 years. The message was people vote with Obama all the time. Two years from now which means right now the Republicans have to show they are doing something. This time gridlock will be their fault, because they are in charge!
You wish. Boehner and the Repubs already whining that Obama won't do what they want. I think I read it on TPM.
People are afraid so they vote GOP. I wish America home of the brave would come back.
Not according to their thought leaders:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/392082/governing-trap-editors
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/11/05/Rush-Limbaugh-GOP-Elected-Not-to-Govern-Work-Together-But-Stop-Barack-Obama
(Discuss – Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Frankly, Zap, I'm really sick of the blame game from the circular firing squad. I fail to see how it helps anything going forward. Consultants are paid to consult, and they're always going to ignore people like us.
And the fake conservatives who lied and slimed Udall and the complicit media are always left out as targets.
Udall should have won. He made mistakes, overfocused on the abortion issue, underfocused on minimum wage and other economic issues, but so what. If not for the relentless Fox noise machine promoted by trolls on this very blog, his message would have gotten through.
Udall should have won,….so should Vic Meyers, Irv Halter, Lois Fornander, and any number of other candidates much better than their opponents. And there will always be plenty of blame to go around.
Maybe you're completely right, and if Udall hadn't tried to go all fiscally conservative and had stuck to a progressive economic message (forget balanced budget and Simpson-Bowles, which I would bet less than 5 people on this highly political blog could even explain, promote raising minimum wage and stop offshoring jobs, make corporations pay their taxes), perhaps he could have eked out those 2-3 points he needed.
I blame myself, too, for not making and taking more time to canvass and to write and report about the flaws in the GOP candidates. I like to think that Tom Ready's not replacing Sal Pace as a Pueblo County Commissioner is partly due to writing I and others have done.
Again, what is it exactly you would have readers of your writing do? Write to Bennett and tell him to stop compromising? Only support genuine progressives? What?
You have to give people hope – you can't just tell them that all of their leaders suck and their political institutions are morally bankrupt. That's AC's job, and he takes 's his responsibilities seriously. What's yours?