U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 12, 2015 02:08 PM UTC

Mike Coffman Salutes More Planned Parenthood "Committees"

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

If a tree falls in the forest, and nobody is around to hear it, does it still make a noise? If you can answer that question, maybe you can solve this one as well: How many special/select committees can Congress create to investigate the same subject?

As ThinkProgress reported last week:

House Republicans have created a new committee specifically tasked with investigating the women’s health organization, despite the fact that months of scrutiny have failed to turn up any evidence that the group is actually breaking any laws.

The special committee formed on Wednesday brings the total count of congressional committees investigating Planned Parenthood up to five. There are already three in the House and one in the Senate…

…Republican lawmakers say the special committee will help consolidate the ongoing probe into Planned Parenthood under one legislative body. Though they acknowledge that they cannot definitively say the national women health’s organization has violated the law, they argue that doesn’t eliminate the need for further inquiry into fetal tissue research — a scientific practice that has come under fire following the release of several inflammatory videos accusing Planned Parenthood of illegally profiting from the sale of aborted baby parts.

As we noted on Friday, one of these “PP Committees” ended up producing very little aside from rhetorical nonsense; Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, admitted that his Committee’s investigation turned up, well, nothing.

“Did we find any wrongdoing? The answer was no,” Chaffetz said.

Still from Rep. Mike Coffman's 2014 ad using Planned Parenthood's logo.
Still from Rep. Mike Coffman’s 2014 ad using Planned Parenthood’s logo.

Nothing? Oh. Well, good thing there are still four PP Committees that are still investigating. Last week the House voted to establish a Select Investigative Panel of the Committee on Energy and Commerce to look into the nonsense allegations against Planned Parenthood. Plenty of Republicans voted in favor of creating this committee, including Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Aurora)…who used Planned Parenthood’s logo to imply an endorsement of his campaign in 2014.

You may recall from a few weeks ago that Coffman also voted in favor of cutting federal funding from Planned Parenthood, even with the knowledge that such a vote could derail negotiations hoping to avoid a government shutdown for the second time in three years. The explanation for that vote and the contrasting use of the Planned Parenthood logo for his campaign led to this classic response:

“Using Planned Parenthood’s expression of support is not the same thing as saying it’s a good organization,” said Coffman’s spokeswoman Cinamon Watson in an email to 9NEWS.

Republicans in Colorado have been trying hard to stoke the flames of manufactured anger over Planned Parenthood, and Rep. Coffman has happily joined in at every step — nevermind his 2014 campaign claims. But after Rep. Chaffetz’s frank comments that his Planned Parenthood investigation turned up nada, how can Coffman and other Congressional Republicans continue to promote more investigations? If another committee does try to push some sort of “evidence” involving Planned Parenthood, the first casualty will be the Republican members of Rep. Chaffetz’s committee; they’re going to look pretty incompetent if another committee claims evidence of wrongdoing after they reluctantly admitted running into a dead end.

But…if all five of these Committees fail to produce anything meaningful, will Coffman support the creation of a new Committee to investigate those other Committees? It only seems fair.

Comments

6 thoughts on “Mike Coffman Salutes More Planned Parenthood “Committees”

    1. You're right. Congress has every right to create a new Planned Parenthood investigative committee every day for the next year. It's also their right to create an investigative committee to determine the ideal method for making s'mores. 

    2. Of course no one here is questioning Congress right to form another committee. What's being questioned is the Republicans judgment and motives. Thus far, all the evidence exonerates PP, so why form another committee to investigate that organization unless the real motivation is something Republicans don't want to admit like what happened when Rep. McCarthy finally admitted the real reason why the Benghazi committee was formed. We've already had six House committees investigate Benghazi and now a seventh. The first six found no fault with Hillary Clinton so why the seventh. Sir or Madam, judgment and motivation are the issues, not the majority's authority.

      1. To me, it's about audiences. Liberal Democrats do not want to hear more about Benghazi, but conservatives and other Americans do. The House has the authority and that's all that matters. If you don't like it, persuade America to give the House back to the Democrats.

        When they don't, YOU need to figure out why and make changes. Perhaps the change should be less corrupt leaders like Hillary Clinton.

    3. It's all a waste of government resources, two, three, four or more staff to do what one could do.  It's almost like the GOTP want to prove government is stupid.  And they are at least partly right, which everyone already knows.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

63 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!