U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 21, 2016 12:33 PM UTC

Get More Smarter on Thursday (Jan. 21)

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

GetMoreSmarter-SnowAs far as we can tell, no other Colorado Republican has announced plans to run for U.S. Senate today. So far, anyway. It’s time to Get More Smarter with Colorado Pols. If you think we missed something important, please include the link in the comments below (here’s a good example).

TOP OF MIND TODAY…

► There are at least 10 Republicans who have announced plans to run for U.S. Senate in 2016. One of them will make it through a June Republican Primary — theoretically, at least —  with a gigantic hole to fill before November, as John Frank reports for the Denver Post:

U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet’s campaign will report a nearly $2 million cash haul for the final three months of the year, giving him $6.7 million to start the 2016 election year.

The Democrat boasts a substantial advantage over his potential Republican challengers — which now number 10 with Peg Littleton’s entry into the race Wednesday. The question of whether a GOP challenger can raise enough money to mount a significant contest depends on the candidate and the level of outside money in the race.

No other candidates have yet reported their Q4-2015 fundraising numbers, though Republican Ryan Frazier claims to have somehow raised more than $200k.

 

► State Rep. Jon Keyser will end his brief term in the state legislature this week in order to focus full-time on his campaign for U.S. Senate. You can expect to see “Liar Liar, Jon Keyser” quite a bit in the coming months, and not because it rhymes.

 

Get even more smarter after the jump…

IN CASE YOU ARE STANDING NEAR A WATER COOLER…

► The Women’s Media Center and the Colorado Independent have some interesting insight into how issues of contraception and abortion are covered by the media. As we wrote yesterday:

The study looked at the authorship and use of sources in articles about reproductive issues in American politics at a number of leading daily newspapers around the nation. Colorado’s newspaper of record The Denver Post scored very low among those examined for both. Only 38% of stories in the Post on reproductive issues were authored by women while 53% were authored by men (the remainder had no byline at all). In terms of at least quoting women in stories about women’s reproductive issues, which you would think would be a priority, the Post did even worse: only 28% of such stories uses women sources. The only paper surveyed that did worse in this regard was the arch-conservative Wall Street Journal.

This is really quite stunning. The Denver Post — on average — quotes a man 52% of the time when discussing reproductive rights issues. Women are only quoted at a 28% rate, with further attributions going to organizations or “unknown” sources.

 

► Congressman Ken Buck (R-Greeley) has formally endorsed Texas Sen. Ted Cruz for the Republican Presidential nomination.

 

► Immigration groups in Denver are celebrating a Supreme Court decision from Wednesday. As the Denver Post reports:

Immigrant-rights groups took to the steps of Colorado’s Supreme Court building Wednesday to celebrate the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear a case concerning President Obama’s executive action to protect some undocumented immigrant families from deportation…

…The Supreme Court’s decision came after a federal appeals court filed an injunction last year, suspending the implementation of DAPA — the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program.

The program would give “individuals who, as of November 20, 2014, have a son or daughter who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident” the possibility to live and work legally in the U.S., according to court documents.

The appeals court ruled that the Obama administration overreached its authority when it made its executive decision to approve the program. The high court will hear the case in the spring, and a decision is likely by June.

 

► Durango officials have given the thumbs-up for a Superfund designation intended to help clean up scores of abandoned mines in Colorado. The town of Silverton is still trying to make up its mind.

 

► A Thornton Democrat is pushing legislation to change the name of the “Columbus Day” holiday in Colorado to “Indigenous Peoples’ Day.” We don’t have a problem with this idea, though advertisers for auto dealerships and furniture manufacturers are going to need to work on a new script for their annual “sales.”

 

► The Colorado legislature will debate various matters surrounding the issue of fracking in Colorado, which seems destined for a ballot battle in November regardless of what happens under the State Capitol.

 

► Legislators are debating a bill that supporters claim would eliminate “unnecessary paperwork” currently required on certain issues by the Colorado Department of Revenue. Is it really necessary to spend legislative time discussing something unnecessary? Oh, sorry, we answered our own question there.

 

OTHER LINKS YOU SHOULD CLICK

► Republicans have yet to choose their Presidential nominee for 2016, but onetime supporters of Jeb! Bush are already trying to figure out who to blame for the inevitable failure of the Jeb! campaign. If we had a vote, we’d cast one for the person who had the idea to put a giant exclamation point after “Jeb” on early campaign materials.

 

► You’ve no doubt heard plenty of talk about how the Republican Party “establishment” is terrified that Ted Cruz or Donald Trump could end up as the GOP nominee for President. What you haven’t heard as much is that these establishment figures are not interested in pushing Florida Sen. Marco Rubio as the alternative choice.

ICYMI

► Bob Dole thinks that Republicans are headed for “cataclysmic” losses in November if Ted Cruz is the GOP nominee for President. We’ll never be able to think about Bob Dole without first imagining Norm Macdonald’s Saturday Night Live parody of “The Real World.”

 

Get More Smarter by liking Colorado Pols on Facebook!

Comments

7 thoughts on “Get More Smarter on Thursday (Jan. 21)

  1. He who has the most campaign cash is obviously the most worthy and will easily win. And since he's a D, he gets the Mongo Like stamp of approval.

    We love you, Mike!

  2. From the article on the fracking discussion:

    Meanwhile, Rep. Perry Buck, R-Windsor, will continue to push for compensation for mineral-rights owners. Similar legislation failed last year, but Buck said she wants to keep the conversation going.

    “To me, this is really about government and a person’s property rights,” Buck said. “I’m a strong advocate for property rights, and I just think that we keep that to where we don’t set precedents on government coming in to take somebody’s mineral rights from them.”

    I'm so tired of this.  You're right, Perry, it is about the government and person's property rights.  The government is failing to adequately regulate to protect the property rights of thousands of homeowners who have a right to quiet enjoyment of their property; to prevent trespass, which includes noise, vibration, smell, and light; and to protect their investment and the resulting profit from it when they sell their homes.  If you were a strong advocate for property rights, you'd have a helluva harder time picking sides in this.

    1. What about my rights to quantify the wind and solar falls within the borders of our farm? (even Anschutz refers to wind turbines as "gas wells turned upside down").  I'll look forward to Rep. Bucks legislation to dismantle the 25kW limit on net metering in rural electrics and open the marketplace to real competition. 

    2. Were you here, oh, say, 10 or 15 years ago (or was it more recently?) when a proposal to raise mineral severance taxes was on the state ballot and it failed? It’s the dudes who own rights to the stuff underground that matter, not those who live on top of it. I doubt I’ll see in my lifetime any attempt to reintroduce such a proposal in this state, much less any call to repeal the Mining Act of 1872. Sigh.

        1. That was back when gas prices were in the $4 range with rampant speculation that oil could hit $200 a barrel, so naturally, the O&G industry claimed this measure would raise consumer gas prices even further.  Followed by the Wall Street meltdown, adding more economic fear to the mix, even though the facts were clear:

          "The oil and gas companies will try to spend $20 million to buy the election," Kenney said. "We're going to get outspent. We will never be able to spend as much money."[12]

          Gov. Ritter blasted the oil and gas industry on Aug. 4, 2008, for claiming that this initiative would hit Coloradans with higher utility bills, steeper pump prices, and pit local governments against energy firms. "I know they can say that, but it's not accurate and it's not fair," he said.[13]

          Ritter called Colorado's contribution to world oil supplies "minuscule," saying they have no impact on prices in a global market. He said it is the transport of natural gas to markets outside of Colorado via new pipelines that has driven up those prices.[13]

          "If you really look at pricing in this industry, removal of this subsidy is not something that's going to impact (prices) in a substantive way," Ritter said.[13]

          https://ballotpedia.org/Colorado_Oil_and_Natural_Gas_Severance_Taxes,_Initiative_58_(2008)

          Scare tactics do work.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

71 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!