President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 22, 2016 03:12 PM UTC

It's a Trap! Neville Leads Senate GOP To Messaging Disaster

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Admiral Ackbar.
Admiral Ackbar.

Today, the GOP-controlled Colorado Senate gave final approval to Senate Bill 16-070, this year’s edition of perennial “work for less” legislation that would cripple the ability of labor unions to organize in Colorado workplaces.

“Work for less,” like abortion bans and other pieces of hard-conservative legislation coming out of the Republican Senate, is of course destined for a quick death in the Democratic-controlled Colorado House. The rationale behind Republicans introducing politically distasteful legislation with no realistic change of passage is generally to motivate their base voters to turn out in elections–the theory being that these bills will do more to motivate friendly voters than rile up opponents. In the case of Tim Neville, sponsor of SB16-070, the bill has natural value in his GOP U.S. Senate primary campaign.

But it doesn’t always work. If the goal behind Senate Bill 70 was to motivate base Republican voters more than the liability created by the legislation would hurt, Senate Democrats did a masterful job “trolling” the attempt. Before passage of SB-70 on second reading, the bill was amended to include the following provisions:

8-3.3-104. Prohibited activities. ON AND AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS SECTION, AN EMPLOYER SHALL NOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE WHILE CARDS ARE BEING CIRCULATED, DURING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, OR WHILE A LABOR ELECTION IS PENDING, BY:
(a) APPLYING PHYSICAL RESTRAINT;
(b) PREVENTING BATHROOM USE;
(c) ELIMINATING LUNCH BREAKS;
(d) REDUCING PAY; OR
(e) DEMOTING THE EMPLOYEE.

But today, Neville ran a procedurally unusual last-minute amendment which stripped this language entirely from his bill. At first blush, that might not seem out of the ordinary. But in the context of a bill that was going to die anyway, Neville’s insistence on removing the language you see above is far more of a political problem.

Why, you ask? Because Republican Colorado Senators just voted to make it legal to take away bathroom breaks from employees. It doesn’t matter if you’re a union member or not, the characterization of this vote–with no embellishment needed–is a political nightmare for every Republican who cast it. We understand that Neville wields a great deal of power in the Senate GOP caucus, but to follow him blindly into this trap as they did today is really quite astounding.

Don’t believe us? Just wait until you see the TV spots and mail pieces.

Comments

6 thoughts on “It’s a Trap! Neville Leads Senate GOP To Messaging Disaster

      1. By which he defines doing the people's business as not letting them do their business if you know what I mean.  What a 'One and done' robotic response.  Surely our exchanges Blue pulling each others hair was more entertaining than this slug's slime?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

124 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!