President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 04, 2016 12:45 PM UTC
6 Comments
May the best dick joke win — it’s not like this is a Presidential debate or anything. It’s time to
Stupid Dem Politician Tricks: "The Benefits of Outsourcing":
Yeah, many parts of our economy receive its benefits, like large stockholders, CEO's, brokerage houses, maybe a 401K account here and there.
My Big Blue Benevolent employer today has announced layoffs, RIF's, a "reorganization", rebranding or some such thing. I didn't get it, some friends did. They would be hard pressed to see the benefits of losing your job at any time or place, regardless of your individual contribution, due to an incompetent manager who knows how to show a profit with only 1 trick: hiring the cheapest labor in the world to meet next quarter's earning estimate.
You won't get any argument from me about HRC's …ummmm… flexibility, but your point would be stronger if the two examples you cite weren't 8 years apart.
And, after all, If it weren't for her opportunistic nature she'd still be the same old center right DLC Dem she was in the 90s and earlier 2000s when that was what was working for Dems. You know. The whole we're almost as responsible and tough and pro-corporate as Rs, no threat to the pockets of the rich, but better on the social issues thing. It got the Clintons into the WH twice (the first time with a bit of an assist from Ross Perot), at a time when "conservative" was gold, "liberal" was dreck and I don't think "progressive" was in vogue yet.
One advantage to an ambitious pol who wants to make it to the top and who knows which way the wind blows is that if you get the wind blowing in a more desirable direction, as Warren and Sanders have within the Dem party, you get that pol moving too.
She'll be OK in the WH. She'll do a good job. Pretty much like today's Obama who is a little more liberal than the Obama of his earlier dead center centrist presidential years. We just need to take the Senate back and work on the House.
Oh and it looks like the whole e-mail thing isn't going anywhere terribly serious after all. Donald isn't going to get the HRC criminal indictment he's wishing for. It will be old news come election time.
I just realizeEd the real problem with HRC, at least for cross over appeal: she never tells dick jokes.
Of course, her husband is sort of a walking dick joke she can't get away from…
But so been there done that I don't think anybody's changing how they feel about all that at this point.
Yeah.. I think even some Republicans are beginning to figure out that one is a dead horse.