(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
By Bob Seay
On the surface, Ken Buck’s “Blue Lives Matter” proposal looks good. (“Rep. Ken Buck introduces ‘Blue Lives Matter’ bill to make targeted killing of a police officer a hate crime”, March 17) Like Mr. Buck said, “I can’t imagine anyone would be opposed to protecting police officers.” I agree. My brother is a cop. I would do anything to protect him and his fellow officers.
But Mr. Buck’s bill is not intended to protect police officers. It is a cynical political ploy designed to further divide our country and to garner votes for himself and his Right Wing colleagues.
Conservatives typically oppose laws for hate crimes, which they often refer to as “thought crimes.” They maintain that all violent crimes should be prosecuted vigorously, regardless of who the victim might be. Colorado and many other states already require either the death penalty or life without parole for the killing of a police officer. There is no legal or prosecutorial benefit to be gained by classifying the killing of a police officer as a hate crime. There is, however, a strong potential political benefit to be had by exploiting the deaths of these honorable men and women.
Good cops resolve conflicts. Likewise, a true statesman sees the big picture and works to bring people together. With this bill, Buck has intentionally done just the opposite. His deliberate appropriation of the slogan “Black Lives Matter” is a giant middle finger to people who are legitimately concerned about the very real problem of the use of excessive force by rogue officers. The title “Blue Lives Matter” virtually guarantees that this bill will incite division and violence, much of which will be directed at the very officers that Mr. Buck claims to want to protect. It inflames the conflict and divides people. This is type of schoolyard taunting is very popular among the Donald Trump -Ted Cruz wing of the Republican party. It also has the potential to make the country explode.
If Ken Buck is really concerned about protecting police officers, then he should come out against armor piercing “cop killer” bullets. He should make it harder for criminals and potential terrorists to acquire military-grade weapons. He should provide funding for more training in conflict resolution so officers are better equipped to deescalate potentially deadly situations before anyone is killed.
According to the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, a total of 94 police officers were killed while on duty last year, 52 in traffic-related accidents and 42 from gunfire. These men and women died while protecting us and our values. They deserve our utmost respect and gratitude.
Ken Buck wants us to believe that those who oppose his bill are in favor of people killing police officers. Nothing could be further from the truth. We oppose his bill because we don’t want to make the job of policing more difficult and more dangerous than it already is.
Bob Seay is a Democratic candidate for Congress for CD-04. His website is http://BobForColorado.org
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: unnamed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Tuesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
But Buck wants to make it exceedingly easy for cop killers to get guns.
Bet he's a big fan of armor piercing bullets too. You know. So we can fight the storm troopers Obama will send when he cancels the 2016 election, declares martial law and Sharia law to take away our guns and put us in reeducation camps where we'll all be converted to Islam. We'll definitely be needing those armor piercing bullets then.
Bob:
Are you not serious, or just stupid?
"If Ken Buck is really concerned about protecting police officers, then he should come out against armor piercing “cop killer” bullets "
How many of the 94 police officers killed were killed by armor piercing bullets?
No..the question, you moron, is how many were saved by a vest or a car or other shield that would have died had armor piercing rounds been used..
Your absence has been much appreciated, PissAnt, you going to fuck that up for us?
Hey Tiny.
Wrong as usual.
Thanks for stopping by.
Yeah – makes no difference if it's armor piercing or not because the GOP and YOU have made sure cop killers have easy access to guns and ammo. But, armor piercing is just an escalation in the arms race and that just helps Buck's gun industry benefactors. That Ken Buck, such a "principled" a-hole.
To make AC appear, one must merely post something true, and critical, about Ken Buck. He is unswervingly loyal to his master.
Good Lord. Thought you had been… uumm… discontinued.
Well, 52 of them died in auto accidents. But the really stupid thing is to classify murder of a peace officer as a hate crime which would tack additional years on the perp's sentence. Colorado law only allows two sentences for killing a peace officer: life without parole or execution. How do you "enhance" either penalty? This empty bombast is typical of buck. As for your question, how many police must die before we limit cop killer bullets to the hands of law enforcement and the military. Since my son in law is a Denver cop, I suggest the answer is that even one is too many. Ask the Jeffco deputy who died when a thug fired a .50 caliber rifle through his vest.