President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 06, 2008 05:57 PM UTC

Mark Udall: Biggest Senate Win in 24 Years

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As the Rocky Mountain News reports:

Democrat Mark Udall beat Republican Bob Schaffer by 10.31 percentage points in November’s U.S. Senate race – the best showing by a Democrat since Gary Hart’s win during Watergate.

Oddly, perhaps, that’s no surprise to Dick Wadhams, chairman of the Colorado Republican Party and campaign manager for Schaffer.

“I’ve always said we haven’t seen anything like 1974 – when the playing fields were so heavily tilted to Democrats – until 2008,” Wadhams said.

He said he believes any Republican challenging Udall would have had a difficult time.

But Udall’s campaign manager, Mike Melanson, said that while the national climate helped his candidate, there were plenty of other reasons why Udall had such a strong showing in a swing state.

“We had a candidate who cared about Western values, not social issues,” he said…

Come January, both of Colorado’s Senate seats will be held by Democrats, a phenomena not seen since the Watergate era.

Schaffer and other Republicans faced an uphill battle because of President Bush’s unpopularity, the spiraling economy and a charismatic Democratic presidential candidate.

Ah, nothing like revisionist history, eh Dick? Certainly this was a Democratic year, but Bob Schaffer was a bad candidate who ran a bad race, and that would have been a bad combination in any year.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Mark Udall: Biggest Senate Win in 24 Years

  1. Why are we still counting in a Senate race in blue Minnesota? Quality Republican candidates won, or came very very close, in this election.

    Just look at Bernie Buescher who was an incumbent and had a lock on becoming Speaker – and a Republican challanger beat him.

    Schaffer, Musgrave, & Wadhams just sucked. They can talk around it all they want but they were a crappy product poorly sold.

  2. Short of turning CD-6 and CD-5 blue too? I’m worried that we have two paths now: we can either plateau for as long as possible, or our success begins to wane.

  3. The statistics are undeniable.  But, perhaps the interpretation is a bit off.  It is my opinion that Shaffer lost by the biggest margin in 24 years, and that he and the Republicans were more responsible for that margin than were Udall and the Democrats.

  4. If John Salazar joins Obama cabinet, an R could win the congressional seat in a special election. Unless they put up another bad candidate like Schaffer. A moderate, thoughtful Republican might get the unaffiliated vote there. There are very few D’s that could win in that district. It would take a bad campaign and candidate from the Republicans to lose that one I fear. Look what happened in Georgia in the runoff. CD3, I believe has more R’s then D’s.

    Do we have any gun toting, tree hugging Dems out there that could excite the D’s enough to show up again? I consider myself a gun toting, tree hugging progressive, but, I don’t live in CD3. Bernie better find a cowboy hat fast! I think Curry may have a couple.

    For us political junkies who love campaigns, this might be just what the doctor ordered for those of us who are going through withdrawals. Minnesota can’t have all the fun.

    Udall ended up winning by a larger margin in Colorado then Obama. Athough McCain’s campaign was not near as good as Obama’s, Schaffer’s was just horrible.

    Udall 53% Schaffer 43% 4% other (10 points)

    Obama 54% McCain 45% 1% other   ( 9 points)

        1. Maybe. This isn’t rocket science. Pretty simple stuff actually. We dems need to hope for an extreme rightie on the R side that will appear partisan and hope the dems in CD3 are wise enough to put up a dem that can win in a fairly conservative district. The democrat running for CD3 will need to articulate how we get out of this horrible economic mess, appear to be above partisan politics and voters will have to “like” the candidate once they are introduced to the voters. Everyone that has been mentioned both on the R and D side will have to introduce themselves to most of the district because none in the obvious stables will be widely known outside their current/former districts and will have to look good in front of small gatherings and TV appearing very comfortable in his/her skin. Remember, this is a very large district. The dems can win this thing but it will take a great campaign, consistent message and very good candidate that fits the district.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

129 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!