President Trump unveiled his federal budget plans today, and HOLYCRAPWHATAREYOUTHINKING? As the Washington Post reports:
President Trump on Thursday will unveil a budget plan that calls for a sharp increase in military spending and stark cuts across much of the rest of the government including the elimination of dozens of long-standing federal programs that assist the poor, fund scientific research and aid America’s allies abroad.
Trump’s first budget proposal, which he named “America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again,” would increase defense spending by $54 billion and then offset that by stripping money from more than 18 other agencies. Some would be hit particularly hard, with reductions of more than 20 percent at the Agriculture, Labor and State departments and of more than 30 percent at the Environmental Protection Agency.
It would also propose eliminating future federal support for the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Within EPA alone, 50 programs and 3,200 positions would be eliminated.
The cuts could represent the widest swath of reductions in federal programs since the drawdown after World War II, probably leading to a sizable cutback in the federal non-military workforce, something White House officials said was one of their goals.
[mantra-pullquote align=”right” textalign=”left” width=”33%”]”President Trump’s proposed budget will have devastating consequences for our country and for Colorado. I will do my best to fight against the cuts affecting hardworking families, federal employees, businesses and research organizations.”
— Congressman Ed Perlmutter (D-Jefferson County)[/mantra-pullquote]
Trump probably doesn’t have the support in Congress to enact this budget proposal, which includes dramatic cuts to popular programs that nobody in their right mind would stand behind. Indeed many Congressional Republicans reacted with swift opposition. Again, from the Washington Post:
Congressional Republicans also protested cuts that might hurt their districts and states. Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), who had been White House budget director under President George W. Bush, issued a statement “strongly opposing” Trump’s proposed elimination of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. Portman vowed to “fight to preserve” the program, which he said had been “an invaluable resource” to Ohio by generating more than $80 billion in benefits in health, tourism and recreation. [Pols emphasis]
Yeah. Good luck finding a lot of Members of Congress who are willing to look the other way while popular local initiatives get whacked. The attack ads for someone like Sen. Portman virtually write themselves (here’s an outline of the specific programs that would be all but eliminated under Trump’s proposal). In fact, congress may be protecting Trump from himself by opposing this plan; as Politico explains, the result of Trump’s budget proposal would be a devastating blow to a good number of Trump voters:
But while Trump’s first stab at budget politics has some eye-popping cuts, if passed it would also hurt many of the voters who supported him as a result of its slashing of after-school programs, job training and disease-fighting research — a line item that both Republicans and Democrats tend to support.
Unless the Department of Defense is ready with an advanced new weapon that can blow up cancer and keep kids from getting in trouble after school, Trump’s $54 billion in extra defense spending isn’t going to mean squat for most Americans.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Genghis
IN: Boebert’s Most Horrifying “Resurfaced” Video Yet?
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Boebert’s Most Horrifying “Resurfaced” Video Yet?
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Boebert’s Most Horrifying “Resurfaced” Video Yet?
BY: QuBase
IN: Boebert’s Most Horrifying “Resurfaced” Video Yet?
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: America’s Hangman’s Antifa Amnesia Just Got Very Expensive
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Buy 15 or 20 fewer copies of the "flying turkey" known as the F-35 fighter plane and one could fund a lot of the humanities stuff.
Otherwise, despite the comment from Dick Cheney back in the 2000s, deficits do matter. And so does $19 trillion in debt.
We've got to cut something, and I don't want to see our defenses compromise. Hard power prevents terror.
So does intelligence gathering Moldy. If you had any intelligence you'd know that.
Hard power. We didn't have that on 9/11
Hard power is the name of Moldy's new skinhead punk band.
And while you were writing your insipid posts, our Senior Senator Michael Bennet was holding a town hall in Colorado Springs. While your other buddy is harder to find than Waldo.
and how did yours truly miss this propitious event?
I was thinking we could cut the funding for Biff's sojurns to Mar-a-Lago.
Bragging about "hard power" is the only way those terms can have any connection to Moldy's sad, weak, flippity-floppity existence.
Moderatus says: "Hard power prevents terror."
So, all that "hard power" being exercised in Iraq and Afghanistan has prevented terror? All the "hard power" used in Vietnam prevented terror?
The more powerful explanation I've seen is that hard power's influence is more like squeezing Play-Doh. It makes an impression only where the power is applied, and spreads things out. After power is withdrawn, things can return to a similar shape as before. Maybe that helps explain a growth of terror incidents outside the immediate war zone. And our intervention in the government of Iran with veiled hard power in 1953-54 and our efforts to prop up the Shah afterwards resonated — and pretty clearly led to the 1979-80 Revolution there.
Hard power prevents terror? Bullshit. Good police work and intelligence prevents terror. As for cutting something, how about the disastrous F-35 or plans for new and increasingly vulnerable aircraft carriers.
Trump needs to keep people uneducated.
Stupid voters are how he got elected in the first place, and he has to protect that demographic.
Gee, think there might be some fat in the DoD budget?
Russia doesn't need obsolete tanks. They are spending their funds on cyber-warfare and getting great results.
true, unfortunately.
"already spends $600 billion dollars a year on its military……." Trump proposes an increase to $639 billion.
Then there is the off-budget slush fund of $65 billion for the efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. And I firmly believe that the VA budget; proposed to be $78+ billion; should be part of the overall Pentagon budget since it's medical care for military veterans.
Total military budget then becomes $782 billion. I'm hopeful that Moderatus, Andrew or Pear/Prune can come up with a logical reason why the country needs to spend so much on defense. Oh, and I left out the billions in the Department of Energy for maintaining the nuclear arsenal. My bad.
With Trump and the Republicans getting ready to weaken our citizens with crippling cuts in health care, medical research, clean air, water and land programs, food programs, etc. Russia can well afford to reduce their defense spending since we seem to be able to kill our own future without their help:
Piss Trump.