(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(D) Julie Gonzales
(R) Janak Joshi
80%
40%
20%
(D) Jena Griswold
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Hetal Doshi
50%
40%↓
30%
(D) Jeff Bridges
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
50%↑
40%↓
30%
(D) Diana DeGette*
(D) Wanda James
(D) Milat Kiros
80%
20%
10%↓
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Alex Kelloff
(R) H. Scheppelman
60%↓
40%↓
30%↑
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) E. Laubacher
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
30%↑
20%
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Jessica Killin
55%↓
45%↑
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Shannon Bird
(D) Manny Rutinel
45%↓
30%
30%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
It’s a little late for this, fellas, but as The Associated Press reports:
American agriculture officials want to change the name for the virus that’s broken out in Mexico and the U.S. from “swine flu” to something else.
The problem, they say, is that the name “swine flu” suggests a problem with pork products. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack points out that the virus is not food-borne and has nothing to do with consuming pork products.
Vilsack says he’s concerned that misunderstandings could have a negative impact on farmers who provide pork products to consumers around the world.
Now here’s a real opportunity to make lemonade from lemons, or bacon from a pig: Have a cool naming contest! What better way to get the word out about swine flu than coming up with a new name while also educating people about the dangers of the virus that now has no name?
We’ll take suggestions below and most likely not pass them along to the Department of Agriculture. But we might have a cool poll if we get enough suggestions.
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Comments