U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 17, 2009 06:12 PM UTC

GOP Gets Help Gunning For Apuan

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

One of the more interesting Democratic victories in 2008 was the surprise win by Rep. Dennis Apuan in Colorado House District 17, which includes southern Colorado Springs and much of Fort Carson. Apuan was in fact the only Democrat who picked up a GOP House seat last year, and by a very small margin–about 600 votes.

And the GOP wants it back, as the Colorado Statesman reported made clear in a transparent hit piece published Friday:

During an informal question-and-answer session, one of Apuan’s friends voiced support for House Bill 1317, which aims to impede the Army’s proposed expansion of Fort Carson’s Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site. The bill prohibits the sale or lease of state-owned land within the proposed training area, which would riddle the acreage with off-limit areas…

“Representative Apuan, exactly what was Fort Carson’s position on that bill? And who did you talk to on the base?” asked Kit Roupe, the Republican candidate who ran unsuccessfully against Apuan last year.

“I was opposed to the bill,” Apuan answered meekly. He explained that his vote against the measure was based on the loud outcry from his House District 17 constituents. HD 17 includes Fort Carson.

Dissatisfied by the answer, Roupe repeated her question.

“It was my own vote … and that was Fort Carson’s stand,” Apuan muttered.

As he observed the showdown from the sidelines, Rep. Larry Liston, R-Colorado Springs, whispered, “Apuan voted against it, but he never went to the House well and spoke against it. He didn’t do anything.”

…Apuan is chairman and program director of the Pikes Peak Justice and Peace Commission, the Web site of which links to the Piñon Canyon Expansion Opposition Coalition, among other organizations. Sulzman is head of Citizens for Peace in Space, a subsidiary of the commission.

“I’m very disappointed in Representative Apuan’s lack of action and leadership on this bill. He’s supposed to be representing Fort Carson,” said Liston. “He talks like he supports the men and women at Fort Carson, but when push comes to shove – he’s AWOL.”

“To do what he’s done would be akin to me not fighting a bill to shut down UCCS, which is in my district,” Liston said.

“He neither went to the well to oppose this bill nor attempted to build a coalition against it,” said Liston. “He needs to march into Governor Ritter’s office to demand a veto on HB 1317.”

Rep. Mark Waller, R-Colorado Springs, was equally dismayed with Apuan’s lack of courage…

“Said meekly?” “Muttered?” “Dismayed” with Apuan’s “lack of courage?” First of all, who the hell wrote this? Someone who uses the title “reporter?” You’ll notice those transitive verbs weren’t part of a quote. We know people who would say we are talking about the Colorado Statesman after all, perhaps we’d be better off asking our high school yearbook committee for objectivity. But when we don’t, you know, quote somebody saying so, it kind of sounds like that’s what we think, doesn’t it?

To the issue at hand, it’s clear that some El Paso County Republicans really, really want the Pinon Canyon maneuver site to be expanded. It’s so clear, in fact that gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis found it necessary to jeopardize his candidacy by backing the expansion, setting him against upcoming primary opponent Josh Penry–and the majority of Republicans in Colorado, for whom private property rights are not negotiable–just to appease the small but politically active El Paso County military establishment (a.k.a. the Bentley Rayburn faction).

That’s the thing–their position on Pinon Canyon is not representative of most Colorado Republicans. We’re not even sure that they can muster enough presence in HD-17 to threaten Apuan just over Pinon Canyon–the “military vote” in El Paso County is not as monolithic as some people think, and an issue that runs counter to basic conservative principles like this one is not going to motivate voters outside of that small establishment we’re talking about.

And what happens if fierce expansion opponent Penry…wins the GOP nomination? We’d say this over-the-top nonsense about “shutting down UCCS” will get a little uncomfortable for Larry Liston.

Democrats know that Apuan is going to be one of their hardest-fought protects next year. It’s clear Republicans are eager to strike, but they’d better find a better stick than this to beat him with.

Comments

8 thoughts on “GOP Gets Help Gunning For Apuan

  1. Pueblo Chieftain:

    http://chieftain.com/articles/

    Gov. Bill Ritter told The Pueblo Chieftain on Saturday that he will sign a bill prohibiting the U.S. Army from expanding its 238,000-acre Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site.

    The announcement was Ritter’s first public commitment to signing into law HB 1317.

    Also called the Landowner and School Protection Act, the bill will bar the sale or leasing of any state land overseen by the Colorado State Land Board to the Army for expansion of the Southern Colorado training site.

    “I have worked with the ranching community, talked to them about their issues, (and) we just settled on the fact that if the U.S. Army was going to take property, they really needed to make its case. They haven’t done that,” Ritter said in a phone interview. “I think this bill was just one thing, for the time being, that provides a safety net for farmers and ranchers down there that they won’t be part of the expansion. It may not be the last discussion we have on Pinon Canyon, but it’s important to put this safety net in place.”

    Sponsored by state Reps. Sal Pace, D-Pueblo, and Wes McKinley, D-Walsh, and state Sen. Ken Kester, R-Las Animas, the bill was approved by the General Assembly with bipartisan support. Ritter said he’ll sign the bill once all the paperwork is completed.

    Ironically, Penry wins too–will end up hurting McInnis the most. And that’s fine because Ritter will stomp Penry in the general.

    Looks like Larry Liston and company will help!

  2. is hardly worth all this angst! I just drove through it and cannot figure out why anyone would care either way. There is a reason there are no towns in that area.

    1. I drove through that area a few weeks ago too. It’s all ranching land, with some nice river bottom and small creeks. No doubt a lot of wildlife, and bird habitat. There were a lot of signs up against the expansion. To the families who ranch there, that land is theirs.  

  3. .

    tell a lie often enough, and people will believe it.

    There was never any plan to take even 1 acre through eminent domain.  

    But don’t let that stop you.

    .  

    1. Since Pols isn’t making the case that there ever was a plan to take even 1 acre through eminent domain, your criticism is especially crafty!

    2. Because landowners down there have a history of Army ‘promises’ to point to.

      http://www.reason.com/news/sho

      he current PiГ±on Canyon Maneuver Site is 245,000 acres along and around the Purgatoire River. It was taken, or purchased after eminent domain proceedings, in September 1983 at a cost of about $26 million ($53.5 million in current dollars) plus $2 million ($4.1 million today) for relocating dozens of ranchers and their families. Southeast Coloradans were promised two things in 1983: There would be no further expansion, and the PCMS would not be used for live-fire exercises. “I reiterate there will be no live firing at [PCMS],” a major general at Fort Carson wrote to a participant at one of the preliminary public hearings on the initial PiГ±on Canyon seizures, in a letter dated July 30, 1980.

      But neither promise has been kept. And some of the same people in the Army’s sights now had their ranch land taken a quarter-century ago.

  4. I like this quote

    “To do what he’s done would be akin to me not fighting a bill to shut down UCCS, which is in my district,” Liston said.

    I didn’t know that bill was out there.  Is that state or federal? (snark)

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

81 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!