U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 12, 2009 08:50 PM UTC

Obama to add another 15,000 combat troops in Afghanistan

  •  
  • by: Barron X

.

BREAKING NEWS!

The US Army announced Friday, 10 July, that it intends to add an additional 15,000 combat troops in Afghanistan, effective 1 January 2010.  

This is in addition to the recent increases of 17,000 and 4,000.  

President Obama doesn’t need any Congressional review or approval for this latest troop increase, which appears to be in response to General McChrystal’s assessment on Thursday, 9 July, that he doesn’t have enough troops.

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=op…

Talk about your quick response!

.

.

The Defense Department doesn’t need to get Congressional approval for this troop increase because these combat troops will be Mercenaries.  Since Mercenaries are hired as contractors, and since the Congress has already appropriated the money to pay for them, the Army has de facto carte blanche to privatize as much of the ground combat as needed.    

If the Army was going to send additional active duty or reserve soldiers or Marines, the President still has effective authority to do that without consulting Congress, despite what the Constitution says.  Those in Congress could always cite Article I Section 8, but who among the Republicans is going to undermine the prosecution of a George Bush vanity war, and who among the Democrats is going to hold President Obama to the limits in that quaint old piece of paper ?  

This troop increase won’t put more uniformed military in Afghanistan, but will permit reassigning 15,000 who are now guarding FOB’s and convoys to get out and interact more directly with the local population, whether through presence patrols or firefights.

.

Me, I don’t like having Mercenaries representing the USA in the most sensitive of all duties, wielding lethal force to influence the local population.  This indicates to me that General McChrystal has thrown in the towel on that whole notion of winning hearts and minds.  

But if we don’t bother to think through why we are fighting in Afghanistan, and if we don’t have any plan for achieving specific goals and pulling out, then I guess a move like this isn’t going to undermine a plan that doesn’t exist.  

.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

65 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!