The Denver Post’s Brian Eason reports on yesterday’s visit to Denver by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi–in which Pelosi backstops Democratic 2018 aspirations in this state, and responds to some dissension in the Democratic ranks after last year’s elections:
U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi met with Denver Post editors and reporters Wednesday to stump for the Democrats’ economic agenda ahead of a progressive women’s event at the History Colorado Center.
In a wide-ranging discussion, Pelosi spoke about President Donald’s Trump response to Hurricane Harvey, Gov. John Hickenlooper’s health care plans and what she thought of U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter’s voting against her for House Democratic leader…
On U.S. Rep. Ed Perlmutter’s changing his mind to run for re-election: “All of the members wanted him to stay,” she said. “He just couldn’t walk into a room when people were not saying ‘Come on.’ … He’s very respected and well liked.”
On Perlmutter’s vote against Pelosi as Democratic leader: “I don’t care.”
On how other Democrats should respond when asked whether they’ll support her for leader: “I just say to people, ‘Just win your election. Don’t worry about me; you just win your election,’ ” she said, acknowledging that Republicans have used her as a issue on the campaign trail.
Overall a good showing by Pelosi yesterday in Denver, where she also addressed topics like the 2018 CD-6 race (bullish on Jason Crow) and condemned any violence committed by left-wing “Antifa” groups–while being careful to differentiate between them and white supremacists, refuting President Donald Trump’s claims that “many sides” are responsible for violence at white supremacist events.
Leader Pelosi echoed the growing hope from Democrats of retaking the U.S. House in 2018. In terms of the dissent among some Democrats that manifested in a few “no” votes against her remaining Minority Leader, including from Colorado’s Rep. Ed Perlmutter, Pelosi gamely shrugged it off. As for GOP attacks, we’ve never really understood the fixation by vulnerable Republicans like Rep. Mike Coffman with Pelosi–other than the most simplistic and dog-whistle-y kinds of attacks, she’s just not that despisable. Sources have told us separately that Pelosi may not even run for Speaker if Democrats retake the House, but ether way the 2018 election is not going to be a referendum on Pelosi.
It’s going to be a referendum on Trump. And it’s looking more and more like a harsh judgment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: bullshit!
IN: Colorado Republicans On The Run, Meet Under A Literal Bridge
BY: bullshit!
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
BY: ClubTwitty
IN: Republicans are Totally Not Terrified of Kamala Harris
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
BY: bullshit!
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: bullshit!
IN: Tina Peters’ Final Appeal To Supreme Court Fails
BY: harrydoby
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Sexism is as sexism does. GOPers can't handle a woman in power.
The GOP's dark money machine hung Pelosi around the neck of candidate Ossoff in Georgia a few months ago like a giant mill stone. He lost by a few points and might have won if not for Pelosi. As for 2018, right now, I think Michael Moore is better informed about the electorate than Pelosi.
But why do you think they hate Pelosi so much?
Because she is a far-left extremist who wants 90% tax rates abortions in every Walmart??
Oh Moldy. Grammy must have spanked you hard today.
Impossible! Nancy Pelosi is a liberal No self-respecting liberal would be caught dead in a Mal-wart.
Wow! 90% off on abortions? I'm gonna go get one right now, and I'm not even pregnant! Hey, a sales a sale, amirite? Thanks, Moddy! I hear that CVS has a BOGO deal on prostate exams…..
Because she has a vagina and that freaks out many of the RWNJs.
Why do they hate Pelosi so much? Well, she is a San Francisco liberal; need I say more?
Seriously, she is the target of the same far righties, with all their fake news, as Hillary was in the campaign. You know them (a few examples of the many): Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, Breitbart, InfoWars, and religious right pathetic losers like Tony Perkins, Franklin Graham, and Falwell Jr. Hillary's campaign staff allowed these far righties to define who she was as a candidate, which she didn't help much with some of her gaffes and history. But, if Pelosi was to step down as minority leader in January, when the 2nd session of this congress convenes, I think that would improve the Dems' chances of re-taking the House.
I agree. It's probably time for the entire top leadership of the House Dems to retire. That's not criticism of their achievements when they were in power but recognition that their time has come and gone.
That said, I do think Pelosi's gender is what gets the far righties all cranked up. Do you see them going batshit crazy over Chuck Shumer who is almost as liberal as she is?
There is also a difference in how they trash Bernie versus how they trash Elizabeth Warren. The far righties criticize Bernie for his left wing views bur with Warren, it's more personal (e.g., Pocahontas).
But the Dems do need younger leadership. Half of whom should be women.
Following the Senate vote in favor of silencing Senator Warren, Senator McConnell said on the Senate floor:
"Senator Warren was giving a lengthy speech. She had appeared to violate the rule. She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted."
This would never have happened to a man.
Pelosi played a very key role in getting the Affordable Care Act, and as the first woman Speaker, she has her place in history. Not sure what is to be gained by hanging on to power. Republicans will smear whomever is the Demo leader, but it would be nice to have all new Demo House leadership going into 2018. Might make a real difference.
I agree- but we should choose leaders based on leadership abilities and policy alignment, not on who we think will make the RWNJ s less mad, or have a younger , more marketable image. We don't want to allow the enemy to choose our leaders for us.
But that is exactly how the far right wing handled the Hillary campaign ("allow the enemy to choose our leaders for us").
Dems are still complacent despite snatching defeat from the jaws of victory last year. Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.
Or, as Henry Ford said, "History is bunk."
If we'd ever learn anything from history, we'd stop putting the Henry Ford's of the world on pedestals for everything that fell out of their mouths and onto a reporter's tablet. He's the prototypical rich-guy-that-should-be-ignored except for what he accomplished.
The immense accumulation of wealth alone does not quality one as, or even lend real credence towards making, a person into a sociological, political, moral, or philosophical genius — or even make their blatherings any more true.
Well said, Dio.