UPDATE: Via the Denver Posts’s Anna Staver, the BS goes on:
Just spoke with a woman who said she was in @SenCoryGardner’s office this morning trying to get a meeting and listened to his staff tell dozens of callers the senator was undecided on #KavanaughVote 🤷🏻♀️ #COPolitics
— Anna Staver (@AnnaStaver) October 5, 2018
It takes a special kind of contempt for the truth to be Cory Gardner, folks.
—–
Yesterday, as protests raged in Washington, D.C. against the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh that before day’s end had resulted in hundreds of arrests, a group of Colorado women in town to peacefully lobby against Kavanaugh scored what could be considered a major coup: a 30 minute face-to-face meeting with Sen. Cory Gardner to make the case that Kavanaugh is unfit for this lifetime appointment.
But as Denverite’s Esteban Hernandez reports, Gardner had no intention of being honest in return:
“The majority of us that were part of the delegation today are survivors of sexual violence,” [Fawn] Bolak said in a phone interview from Washington on Thursday. “So we came out to talk to our senator and share our stories in an effort to sway their vote or encourage deeper action against Kavanaugh.”
Bolak said their visit was organized primarily by the ACLU of Colorado. She works at the liberal advocacy organization ProgressNow Colorado, which held a demonstration outside Sen. Gardner’s offices last week calling on the senator to speak out against Kavanaugh…
“He repeated, over and over again, from his perspective, he heard two people speaking their truth and that he wanted to wait for the FBI report that he would be reading later this evening,” Bolak said. [Pols emphasis]
“Honestly, it felt like a cop-out,” Bolak added. “I think he was probably uncomfortable with a lot of us being in his office, with us sharing violent, intimate details of what happened to us.”
And apparently, it wasn’t just this group of sexual assault survivors who Gardner wanted to imagine he was undecided on supporting Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Gardner’s spokesman said the same thing to the Denver Post for a story late yesterday:
Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colorado, hasn’t decided how he’ll vote on Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee who has faced sexual assault allegations, Gardner’s office said Thursday evening.
The senator wants to finish reading the FBI report before making a decision, spokesman Casey Contres said. Gardner said he’d vote yes on Kavanaugh’s confirmation after meeting with the judge in July. However, that was before several women accused him of sexual misconduct…
After these two reports appeared yesterday afternoon, local reporters were incredulous that Gardner had claimed to be undecided, and swiftly vented their flabbergast:
If @SenCoryGardner can convince the media to cover him as if he’s an undecided swing vote on Kavanaugh, that will be his greatest political feat yet. #copolitics https://t.co/uQNqJ2UXnr
— Kyle Clark (@KyleClark) October 5, 2018
But by the end of the day, it didn’t matter as Gardner issued an updated statement claiming his support for Kavanaugh had never wavered.
“Senator Gardner has been supportive of Judge Kavanaugh throughout the nomination. He had the opportunity to review the FBI report tonight. Nothing in the report changed his mind and he remains supportive of Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination.”
That is of course the answer that everyone expected. There seems to be some desire to criticize the Denver Post for their report, which fails to note that Gardner was not really considered on the fence by anyone–but they didn’t put these words into the mouth of Gardner’s spokesman, or the sexual assault survivors who met with Gardner earlier yesterday.
So what really happened here? It’s simple: classic Cory Gardner subterfuge is what happened. Since his election to the U.S. Senate in 2014 and especially since the inauguration of President Donald Trump, Gardner has played key issues with ambiguity giving over to outright deception–telling different groups of people what they want to hear, and only attempting to reconcile contradictions when forced to.
And when that happens, it’s often not pretty.
In this case, Gardner was too much of a coward to tell this group of sexual assault survivors that he is going to vote to confirm a man accused by multiple women of sexual misconduct to the U.S. Supreme Court. So he didn’t. But because it would plunge Kavanaugh’s nomination into chaos if a leadership-level GOP Senator like Cory Gardner was truly undecided, the news cycle couldn’t end without Gardner copping to the truth.
In short Cory Gardner lied to his own constituents, threw up some deceptive chaff to a local reporter that fell utterly flat under scrutiny, then came home before sundown. It fits well with the larger narrative of Republicans rushing to confirm Kavanaugh in seeming defiance of the allegations against him instead of taking them seriously, but it’s also exactly the kind of deception Gardner’s critics have complained about for years.
It’s one of the clearest examples we’ve seen yet of Gardner’s free-wheeling dishonesty, and we can’t see how it can be spun any other way. But it’s hardly the first, and that’s a lesson everyone who deals with Gardner from voters to reporters need to learn.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Holy Crap Boebert Bestie Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report Is Bad
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Still waiting for the Denver Post to cop to the fact that they royally screwed the pooch in endorsing Gardner in the first place, as well as covering for him subsequently. I won't hold my breath.
Anyone who expects Cory to be other than the soulless grifter he has always been…is fooling themselves.
There are several folks here who have known Cory as long as I….anyone surprised?
The Denver Post reporter is new to Colorado and this beat — let's hope she's not fooled again. Even the Editorial Board must have taken the bait, as their plea in this morning's edition for Gardner to not confirm Kavanaugh seemed to assume there was at least a tiny bit of humanity left in the Con Man.
Denver Post reporter Anna Staver's latest article indicates she's now fully up to speed on the Con Man's BS, and won't get fooled again.
The only thing that surprised me is that he even played this cynical little game. Wasn't he concerned about causing Mitch McConnell a few moments of anxiety? (Unless, of course, he cleared his little game with leadership before he engaged in it.)
No doubt he got permission first. McConnell probably encouraged him to enjoy a little play time with his constituents during this stressful time for the GOP.
Mitch doesn't mind your conning the rubes as long as you come home to Poppa in the end.
Exactly! Whatever it takes to give Cory a fighting chance in 2020, assuming he runs again.
Gardner has to go in 2020 and not just for this. Shame on the Denver Post for supporting this clown.
There is a "Goodbye Gardner" fund on Act Blue. The money will go to whomever Gardner's Democratic opponent is in 2020, after the primary. Similar to the "anybody but Susan Collins" fund generated after her vote to confirm Kavanaugh.
There are so many reasons to oppose Cory Gardner. I'd suggest a monthly pledge to this fund.