March 26, 2010 03:38 AM UTC

Why I Am For Romanoff <____insert reasons here________>

•  
• by: MADCO

I support Michael Bennet and want him to win the 2010 general election for US Senate. Of course, this means I want him to be the D nominee in the primary.

I have tracked comments and diaries here on Pols since September about why various posters support Andrew Romanoff for US Senate.

I have previously posted some of them here. And I am consistently surprised by the passionate opposition to Bennet with no corresponding passionate expression of support for Romanoff.

There have been some solid explanations- I remember Voyageur’s, Dan Willis’s and one other. So I’m not calling them out here- I’m calling out the rest of the anti-Bennet, apparently pro-Romanoff posters.

I’ll paraphrase a few below – and apologies if I get any of your posts wrong. Just correct me here, link to your post or whatever.

Also, if I’ve named someone a Romanoff suporter by mistake, apologies.  Honestly, other than being clearly anti-Bennet, for some of you I’m really just guessing- you coul be pro-Wiens for all you’ve said in favor of Romanoff.

In the end, I assume that almost all the D’s and enough of the U’s can come together and elect the D nominee whether it’s Romanoff or Bennet as either would be far better to me than any of the R candidates.

JO: He’s not Bennet. (HNB)

Sharon Hanson: HNB

otoole:________

StrykerK2: ______

JeffCoTrueBlue ______

RockyMtnModerate: ______

kingbaby: ______

Wade Norris: ______

gaf:  ______

dukeco1  ______

krsteinb  ______

cscottrun4it ______

oldbenkenobi  ______

Sir Robin  ______

protestinthestreet  ______

Anyone else ______