Education gets big headlines year around, not just when an education law like SB191 is being debated at the State Legislature. There are the CSAP tests, the graduation rates, the international comparisons, school rankings, and so on.
The news is mostly bad, and the impression you’re left with, even if the reporting is fairly broad, is that our schools and teachers aren’t doing their jobs well enough, particularly in urban areas like Denver.
But what if we had an annual parade of front-page stories about the success rates of our other public programs on the front lines of the battle against poverty? What’s the “graduation rate” from public housing? From the “free lunch program?” From drug-addiction programs? From poverty itself? Is Colorado making progress in these areas?
My point is that education gets too much media attention, relative to other problems related to poverty in America. I haven’t done a bean count to document this, if one could be done, but who doubts it?
And with the media spotlight on the schools and teachers, legislation like SB191 naturally becomes a hot button story and issue, with various interest groups clamoring to be heard and seen.
So journalists are right to give serious play to SB191, but in doing so, reporters should take every opportunity to illuminate the big-picture issues of school funding and the effects of poverty on education.
“To get a school that serves truly disadvantaged kids to the point where it could actually focus on teaching and learning is going to require infusions of resources that we haven’t even begun to think about, just into the school, let alone the community,” Rona Wilensky, the former principal at New Vista High School in Boulder told me.
If you look through the news coverage of SB 191, you find one perspective that’s predictably under-emphasized: the view that passing any new education laws isn’t the way to improve public education in Colorado.
“They are looking for a simple answer to a complicated problem,” Wilensky told me of the legislative effort in Colorado. “Getting rid of bad teachers is not the solution to all our educational woes. We have the schools we have because we want these schools. They serve a function in our society. Why would we have them if they didn’t work for us? And everything in our system supports them being the schools they are. To change this in a really fundamental way, to equalize school achievement, means overturning the effects of social and economic inequality, which we’ve built our society around.”
Call me a socialist if you must, but don’t you think this perspective should be seen more in coverage of education reform-because what Wilensky says reflects a reality that you miss in education reporting that too often focuses on the latest narrow bit of education-specific data.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Dave Williams Triumphs In Colorado Republican Party Leadership Battle
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Dave Williams Triumphs In Colorado Republican Party Leadership Battle
BY: The realist
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Dave Williams Triumphs In Colorado Republican Party Leadership Battle
BY: JeffcoBlue
IN: Gabe Evans Will “Check The Box,” And That’s Why He Can’t Be Trusted
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: davebarnes
IN: Where Do You Buy One Of Dan Woog’s $25 Burgers?
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Where Do You Buy One Of Dan Woog’s $25 Burgers?
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Where Do You Buy One Of Dan Woog’s $25 Burgers?
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
First, Rona Wilensky is a superb principal. And one who thinks outside to cookie cutter mold. She created a very good thing with New Vista High School – a lot of students graduated from there that would have dropped out of a traditional school.
Second, it’s not so much economic inequality as parental educational inequality. We can give every family a million dollars, that won’t cause many to get their kids off of the TV and on to homework. The home environment inequality is a large problem – but it’s not at root an economic problem.
I’ll buy you a ticket to “Cartel” if you’ll go.