By which I mean, folks who aren’t caught up in the Bennet/Romanoff pissing matches that dominate threads about that contest.
I woke up this morning to behold this diary on the home page, which wasn’t there late yesterday afternoon when I last logged in. It has 160 comments.
Is it worth my time to even click on this and see what’s being said? Or is it the same bullshit from the usual suspects?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Who’s Paying For These Racist Anti-Harris Sign Stunts?
BY: davebarnes
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
BY: Colorado Pols
IN: Who’s Paying For These Racist Anti-Harris Sign Stunts?
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Labor Day Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Of course I am guessing. I don’t want to take the time to look either.
Hooray for our guy.
Your guy is a liar.
Shill.
Shill!
(Repeat, ad nauseum, and then 73 times beyond that.)
ardy’s right.
As ardy & ralphie say, they rapidly degenerate into “you suck”, “no you suck.”
it could have been:
Your Guy is a liar.
Hooray for our guy.
Shill.
Shill!
or even,
Horray for our guy.
Your guy is a liar.
Shill.
Shill!
“Are you a communist?”
Overly-long semi-parental response.
If Dead Guvs or some courageous volunteer, could post daily summaries as an alternative to the entire thread it would be nearly as educational and a huge service to the community.
Romanoff released a “negative ad” – negative by definition in that it was a critique of his opponent rather than about himself.
Bennet released a negative ad to counter AR’s. Clearly already prepared and ready to go, but apparently in response.
Romanoff’s claims that Bennet tok big donations from special interest donors, and then voted for those interests not Coloradans, implying without saying that Bennet is corrupt.
Bennet’s says that Romanoff took PAC donations before, and implies therefore that Andrew’s claim of not accepting special interest money is false.
Campanoff on CoPols complained that there was nothing negative about AR’s ad- unless receiving pac donations and Bennet’s voting history are negatives.
Bennet supporters asked for names of other Colorado elected officials who are corrupt since all but self-funded Polis accept PAC donations and many of them voted the same way as Bennet on the important legislation. One Bennet supporter put up the numbers from FEC.gov (thru 1Q) showing that Bennet received 82% of his donations from individuals and the 18% from PAC/corp donors is the lowest % of all the Colorado congressional delegation.
Campanoff named no names.
Links left out intentionally. You know where they are.
“SUMMARY” — Ardy39 style!
The shilling and cheerleading is so overpowering that I’ve pretty much tuned out of the race. I take in the data points, look to see if there’s a rebuttal from the more rational posters, and otherwise it just flies past without conscious recognition.
Kinda like Libertad’s posts…
so I can use this stuff in the fall. But honestly I just don’t really care to wade through it. In my opinion Dems are screwing themselves by picking Bennet over Romanoff, but more power to them.
You saved me untold minutes of my time.
15 to one that it’s the same old shit. Pretty good margin.
Though honestly I do somewhat enjoy watching my colleagues on the other side of the aisle duking it out amongst themselves.
It is a fine break from the Republican bashing. Unfortunately it is not as funny as the Beauprez-Holtzman shills that were arguing about who was taller back in ’06