U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
September 21, 2011 10:45 PM UTC
15 Comments
Pretty soon there won’t be any way to go after Perry. Too many fellow Republicans standing up for him against the smear campaign! Even some who may not completely agree and are sick of Democrat character assassination. Contrast that against the liberal insurgency against Obama…
you guys need some dictionaries.
Ponzi schemes are phony investment schemes. Social security was never defined as an investment plan and the fact that today’s retirees’ benefits are supported by what todays workers pay in is not a dirty secret. Anyone who cares to look it up can know exactly how it works. So…
Not presented as an investment plan.
Not operated as a deceptive scheme.
Ergo, if you understand what words mean, it can’t be a Ponzi Scheme.
When people say things that are completely inaccurate, it’s not a smear to call them on it.
When you’re done looking up “Ponzi Scheme” and “Social Security”, look up “smear”.
Are you going to wait to tell him that conservapedia dosen’t count as a source ?
But how is criticizing Perry’s position on Social Security even comparable to “character assassination”?
If I said Perry fucked a donkey in Tijuana for eight pesos during a spring break one year, that would be character assassination. If I criticize his positions, that’s, um, how we do things in politics.
in the long form document style stating otherwise, I’m going to have to assume that what you said regarding Perry and the donkey (and only 8 pesos? what a deal–talk about a guy that knows how to get a bargain) is completely true.
I’ll probably spend a million dollars or so of my own money to investigate this story, which is almost certainly true. I wonder if he’s also a secret Muslim. I’ll look into that, too–more bang for my buck.
are asking, why isn’t Perry responding? What does he have to hide?
on March 29, 1971, eight pesos bought a lot of crack cocaine and nuclear missiles to aim at Louisiana.
It can’t be totally made up if I have an EXACT DATE, can it?
a buck was worth 8 pesos
You could get two nukes in a burrito and a handjob for three pesos.
http://www.nationofchange.org/…
In other words, he knows what he’s talking about.