President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 14, 2024 12:46 PM UTC

Tina Peters Not Going Quietly Into That Good Night

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

After ex-Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters’ long-anticipated conviction late Monday on 7 of 10 criminal counts against her stemming from her failed attempt to supply evidence that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Donald Trump, Peters announced that evening she would be “taking the day off” to contemplate events, which is something we generally recommend after being found guilty on multiple felony counts:

Tina Peters on the red carpet at Mar-a-Lago.

But as Mediaite reports, newly convicted felon Peters didn’t end up taking her own good advice to stop talking for a day:

Peters was on Steve Bannon’s War Room on Tuesday and did not back down from her claims of election fraud, which have been widely debunked by election audits and failed court challenges.

“It’s hard to predict what they’ll do. I am a big threat to them. And, so the things that were done in this trial that people can go back and watch on Frank Speech (Mike Lindell’s platform) was just atrocious,” Peters raged.

She added, “I mean, we’re going to continue to fight this in the law. And in the meantime, until they either kill me or put me in prison. You know, I’m going to keep speaking out about the injustice, about what’s going on in these big multinational global corporations that are that have these vote flipping software, that is basically, is in Serbia. We’ve already shown that people in my, that I’m accused of influencing, there’s emails between them and Serbia and Serbia Dominion employees.”

We’ll admit that we haven’t kept precise track of the blinkered details of the thoroughly discredited conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 presidential election and Dominion Voting Systems, but it was our understanding that the nefarious foreign actor in the plot was socialist Venezuela, not Serbia. The current iteration of the conspiracy theory Peters is regurgitating doesn’t matter, though, what matters is that Peters is showing absolutely no remorse whatsoever for the crimes she was convicted of Monday afternoon. That lack of remorse, supported though it may be by a whole culture of 2020 election denialists and egged on by the former President himself, could well factor into the sentence Peters will receive in October.

9NEWS’ Marshall Zelinger calculated the sentencing range for the crimes Peters was convicted of between 7.75 and 22.5 years, so we’re talking about a significant portion of Peters’ remaining natural life depending on the prison term she receives. For years as readers know, Peters has been a minor celebrity in the election conspiracy crowd, and a false mythology surrounding her actions–along with pure fiction about what was supposedly found–has been canonized within that movement. These same reality-detached individuals are now encouraging Peters to invite a harsher sentence at no risk to themselves.

Because Peters was not the originator of the false conspiracy theory that motivated her crimes, her conviction leaves in its wake a sense of necessary but incomplete justice delivered. Peters carried out this plot with the help of numerous unindicted co-conspirators, and Peters’ costly but ineffective legal defense was funded by wealthy election deniers like Mike “MyPillow Guy” Lindell and Patrick Byrne who in addition to paying for Peters’ lawyers provided moral support–and encouragement to stay true to the conspiracy theories that commonly motivated them. Since it was someone up the crackpot food chain who released the stolen data to the public precipitating the criminal investigation of Tina Peters, it’s not unreasonable to think these wealthy donors felt some guilt for compromising their source.

The real way to help Peters of course would be for Tina Peters’ allies to persuade her to drop the discredited conspiracy theories she is clinging to in order to justify her actions and show some authentic remorse ahead of her sentencing. Lindell, Byrne, and Donald Trump may lose face, but for Tina Peters it could make the difference between eventual freedom and a de facto life sentence.

If you really care about Tina Peters, that’s not something you should want on your conscience.

Comments

6 thoughts on “Tina Peters Not Going Quietly Into That Good Night

  1. DA will just put all this together in a nice package for sentencing to demonstrate complete lack of remorse and failure to accept responsibility, thereby justifying a more substantial prison term.  Keep talkin' Tina.  And by the way, Tina, you are an insignicant little speck. Virtually no one cares what happens to you.  You're a useful stooge and idiot 

  2. Politicians and people with money, which Peters certainly has because her wealthy backers have made sure of it, do not go to jail in this country. She will get a slap on the wrist, probably a fine and probation, and be free to keep on doing the horrible damage she does to confidence in our democracy.

  3. I still don't understand the lack of charges for Sherrona Bishop (apparently, the linchpin of the effort), "computer expert" Conan Hayes (who used Gerald Wood's ID and actually made the electronic copy of the device's drive), funder Mike Lindell (who paid for much of the actions of the conspiracy, the conference where the public reveal happened, the safe house for Tina Peters immediately after the conference, and a fair amount of defense lawyering),

    Anyone privy to the rationale of the District DA, the Colorado AG's office, or the Feds?

    1. Peters was the elected official in charge and responsible to protect US the electorate. Thats why. 

      Sad that she is a gold star mother, her USMC son must be rolling in his grave. 

    2. Perhaps Sherronna is benefitting from her surprising decision to up and run to Texas. She bailed when she saw the writing on the wall. Credit her, at least, with good perception skills.

      Methinks it could also involve some pretty high level negotiations involving jurisdictions and such. I could be wrong, of course, but I think Mrs. Bishop is the "connection" between Tinas' local crimes and that group of subversives on the Steve Bannon level.

      I notice the local Republican party, as I have known it, is pretty damned quiet.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

153 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!