U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 31, 2013 10:23 AM UTC
17 Comments
First Gessler enlists Suthers to mess up the IEC's legal counsel by joining Gessler's defense, and then Gessler sues the IEC.
Perfect. Corruption.
If you would actually read your source material, you'd see that Gessler's complaint is legitimate. This does not involve influence peddling, and the alleged crime is being investigated. The IEC is not a criminal court. The only reason they are involved is because Ethics Watch filed complaints everywhere they would be accepted.
It has nothing to do with the facts of the case, just that the IEC is not the right body to investigate.
Hah!
The Independent Ethics Commission is empowered to uphold Amendment 29 of the Colorado Constitution:
So what part of this complaint is outside of their jurisdiction again?
This is a desperate attempt by Gessler to stop the release of a report that might implicate him in using his office unethically. Such a ruling by the commission might also be used to further a criminal case against him. Surely there's nothing in that chain of events that might lead Gessler to conclude that an injunction would be in his benefit if he could persuade a judge to accept his reasoning…
This is the act of a defense attorney arguing any and all points no matter how absurd, just as a matter of effective (or at least complete) representation.
What is the actual law Gessler supposedly broke?
What is the amount of money CEW references in their press propaganda piece?
Define discretionary?
Why is jurisdiction such an issue for Democrats? Without the premise of jurisdiction, any government can go after any person, for any reason, at any time.
Where's your reference about President Truman and fried plutonium vs. fried uranium?
Do you assignments and then we'll move to gessler's illegal partisan activities. Not before.
If you want to participate, try to stay up, bring something accurate, and quit the bullshit accusations.
Get me that Truman reference.
I get it; you do not want to answer these questions because they will probably take the wind from your sails.
Of course Truman never made that exact quote however he did give final approval of the dropping of 1 p bomb and 1 u bomb. His employees favored the Uranium. There are reams of scientific papers regarding their preference and this hideous massacre…
BTW, you give me no assignments, you have no authority…
Then why did you put it in quotes?
Be specific, why would you deliberately mislead readers about this?
This is important, because it speaks to your inability to be factual and coherent. When you abuse the blog like that, you lose credibility. That lack of credibility bleeds into discussion about the less than legitimate dealings of Gessler, which we cannot discuss untill you clear up the false quote concerning President Truman.
Get it done.
As George Washington said:
So …you made it up…right? And that makes you a shit maker-upper, eh?
How incredibly credible of you.
Welcome home, Duke. That sounded scary.
That I70 stretch east-west from Russell is wicked. You obviously didn't put her in the ditch because you did it right.
slow down…no sudden moves…don't stop…
it seems to work.
Not home though…I wish..I will be in Missouri for a month. I look forward to finding out about the political climate amongost the locals here.
Nice place..but it ain't Colorado…traveling always reminds me why I love home (channeling Dorothy a little, I guess).
where in MO?
Springfield…home of Missouri State University, a massive medical education and research presence.. a beautiful location. The people seem very friendly and cooperative. It will be interesting to observe the politics here, compared to ours.
I sense, without knowing, that it is a rather well educated place…more on that later.
Southeast Missouri State University. Springfield is beautiful. Too bad they are manufacturing a new buckle for the bible belt every day
I missed the "Southeast" part…you know the place?
I'm unaware of a real connection between the university and all the hospitals…is there such a connection?
and..Thanks, BTW.
Hmm, no reply button on your above post. There is connection between the university and the hospitals, nursing school anyway, no med school. MU (Columbia) and Northwest Mo State (Kirksville) have med schools