U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 13, 2014 12:35 PM UTC
14 Comments
Colorado Right to Life had no credibility in the pro life movement. They are no longer affiliated with National Right to Life. Nobody cares what they have to say. Gardner is pro life, but abortion rights are not in danger. Gardner will not ban birth control, that's crazy.
Democrats are running out of time. Mark Uterus, get ready for retirement.
This is how Gardner refers to Mark Udall? Stay classy, guys. It is sure to win votes.
Please, can Cory himself call Udall, Mark "Uterus" on camera – it's such a college fratboy thing to say, which is about what Gardner is, and it is unbelieveably demeaning … to women! Of course, Garden and his supporters can't see why that is, and so they blissfully keep repeating it, while remaining entirely ignorant that they are digging their own grave.
The first time I heard "Mark Uterus" was from Lynn Bartels of the Denver Post. She said it in their debate and it stuck.
It's no BWB. It makes haters feel good but doesn't appeal to anyone else. So use it all you want. You'll either get a "right on" reaction from the choir or an "eeewwww!" reaction from everyone else. Big deal.
She said: "Some people are calling you Mark Uterus" – gee, I wonder who "some people" are. It "stuck" with "some people".
Like I said – please, keep using it.
"Some people"=her and Dick Wadhams.
Keep up with the Personhood nonsense.
It seems to be working real well for ya.
It's all they have left. Except planning for defeat.
Ebola, government shut down, underfunding the NIH and the CDC Enterovirus D68 are current issures. And how does underfunding government affect fire and flood control and disaster response? Did I remember to mention Enterovirus D68? How does it enter into this discussion? It has been on the rise in the 21st century.
Remember, we are in the 21st century not the 19th. We are grossly underfunding the CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. You and your friend here seem to be on the side of short sighted stupidity and cupidity.
Cory Gardner — lying? Cynical? Better alert the Denver Post, I *know* they'll immediately retract their honest, sincere endorsement…
Article brings to mind a question. I find it somewhat disconcerting that the Udall campaign has not even mentioned Gardner's support of the special interest land grab; also know as turning over all federal agricultural lands in Colorado to the state. Agricultural lands have not been defined in any of the bills at the legislature, but do appear to exclude national parks, military bases, and Indian reservations (which are sovereign nations anyway). The main sponsors at the State House of been two of Gardner's 4th District cronies; Rep. Jerry Sonnenberg and outgoing Senator Scott Renfroe.
The land grab would severely damage Colorado's outdoor recreation economy by bringing about user fees to hunt, fish, hike, climb, ride your ATV, etc., on the public lands. These lands now, except for some campgrounds and other concessionaire places, are free and open to the public.
In addition, the land grab would trash the ranching industry because the state charges market rates for grazing on state land, where the federal grazing fees are set by Congress and are much lower.
One could call this the hidden war on rural Colorado by Cory Gardner (and Bob Beauprez, who also supports the land grab). C.H.B.
Excellent point. There is so much they could be using and the scheme to take over federal lands, which means taking them from the American public, is one that can be explained so easily. You just did in it in perfect sound bite ready fashion.
I know they're convinced that the only way to win is to pump up the turnout among women and they're right. Dems do need women to turn out in a big way in order to win. Where they're wrong is in assuming that women don't care about anything but "women's" issues. Every issue that people care about is an issue that those people who happen to be women care about.
I also don't understand why they don't use Gardner's established congressional voting record of pure partisan obstruction. He only deviates from his party leadership to join those insisting on even more extreme positions than the leadership advocates. The idea that he's just the kind of Senator we need to break up the log jams and get things done is ridiculous.
If the Udall camp is avoiding going after Gardner's voting record on anything besides "women's" issues because of Republican attacks on Udall for voting 99% with Obama, that ship has sailed. Gardner's made sure that's out there so Udall may as well make sure everyone knows what Gardner's been spending his time supporting during his time in the House, and not just on abortion related issues.
I like a three pronged approach. The center being the strongest and the sides doing sweep and an end around, if necessary.