U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 23, 2014 08:00 AM UTC

James O'Keefe Helps Debunk Mail Ballot Fraud Myths

  • 33 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
James OKeefe, wearing a Mark Udall sticker.
James OKeefe, wearing a Mark Udall sticker.

Conservative media lit up yesterday after conservative provocateur James O'Keefe released a video from his recent "vote fraud" sting attempts in Colorado. Last weekend, we got reports that O'Keefe was in the state attempting to bait Democratic field campaign workers into endorsing fraudulent acts involving mail ballots. Word spread fast from there, but evidently O'Keefe had been on the ground for some time before his presence was publicized.

In the end, it does appear that O'Keefe got what he wanted: out of presumably dozens of attempts where he was informed that his proposal would be felony vote fraud, it looks like he found two people willing to follow his bait into a very, very bad idea: collecting unused mail ballots from students who have moved or transferred, completing them, and turning them in.

Before we go any further, everyone does realize that is a serious crime, right? Good. Let's be very clear about what happened here: O'Keefe was able to lead a couple of low-level table staffers into saying some eye-poppingly stupid things. One agreed with him that turning in other people's ballots would be morally okay, the other actually volunteered "ghetto Aurora" as a good place to collect unused ballots. In both cases, what these staffers for nonprofits Work for Progress and Greenpeace respectively said was absolutely termination-offense unacceptable. We'll go a step further and say the one who got all racial about helping out O'Keefe with his fraud designs must, for the common good, never work in politics again. But in neither case is there any suggestion that these staff would have come up with the idea to do this were it not for O'Keefe's prompting. There's no actual plan by anyone to do what he suggests.

And there's a good reason for that: as our local media has done a good job explaining since O'Keefe's video broke yesterday, the ballot fraud O'Keefe is proposing simply would not work. 9NEWS reports that even GOP Secretary of State Scott Gessler can't defend O'Keefe's allegations:

"I can't promise people that it will happen," Sec. of State Scott Gessler said. "I can't promise people that it can't happen. But what I can say is we've got a pretty good system and we're always trying to make it better." [Pols emphasis]

County clerks are required by law to verify signatures on ballots. Gessler says there is a loophole in that law allowing signatures to go unverified if a witness signs the ballot.

But clerks contend witness signatures are rare, and they still have the power to scrutinize those ballots if they seem suspicious.

Witness-signed ballots are indeed rare–and as the Denver clerk's office explains, you can't just fish a ballot out of somebody else's mailbox and send it in. It will be caught:

"That check of signature verification is really the stopgap to prevent ballots that are being filled out by people who are not the voter," said Amber McReynolds, the director of Denver's elections division.

About 1.5% of the ballots turned into the Denver clerk's office so far have been flagged for signature verification according to this story. That doesn't mean they're fraudulent, of course, it just means that the signature on file with the Denver clerk didn't match the signature on the ballot envelope closely enough to mass automatic muster–or weren't signed at all. Affected voters are notified and given the opportunity to "cure" their ballot by verifying their signature. That's how the system has always worked for absentee and mail-in ballots, and it actually works well. Without anything to go on, what's a fraudster supposed to do to fake someone's signature?

Yes, there's probably some elaborate scheme that could be concocted to obtain examples of signatures of voters to believably forge on mail ballots. If we were to think about all the ways we could violate, you know, just about any law, there are elaborate Rube Goldberg machine ideas we could come up with to pull it off.

But nobody's doing these crazy things to commit vote fraud. It's much cheaper to get out the vote in legal ways.

In a sense, it's good that O'Keefe gave our county clerks a chance to explain how voting by mail actually works in Colorado. It won't mean much to the right wing media breathlessly reporting on O'Keefe's "proven vote fraud" video, or the consumers of said media who aren't really interested in facts that might render them less agitated. But the people who matter–Colorado voters–can be assured that our system does work.

When even Scott Gessler grudgingly admits it, you can feel pretty confident.

Tweet
Share

Comments

33 thoughts on “James O’Keefe Helps Debunk Mail Ballot Fraud Myths”

  1. I'm so pleased to see this filthy, slimy, wormy little GOTP ratfucker exposed and called out on his despicable bullshit.

    You know, one day this scurvy little punk is going to cross the wrong person(s) at the wrong time, and, well, let's just say it ain't gonna be pretty…

  2. Don't assume that O'keefe really found what he wanted. He's been fined in the past for editing video to make it seem like he got what he wanted. Assuming without investigating his claims falls in the same trap that got ACORN banned by a law in Congress based on his heavily edited videos, the same reuptation smearing crap that ousted Shirley Sherrod from her position at the USDA.

    I can't believe we're blindly believing ANYTHING that James O'Keefe puts out – even when the ultimate result is a (probably painful) clarification from our Republican SoS that this can't really happen.

    1. It also wouldn't surprise me if these two example volunteers were plants – though so far O'Keefe seems to have overlooked this easiest way of making an organization look bad. The "ghetto Aurora" comment smacks of either a plant or someone that was playing along (as several of O'Keefe's past victims have…).

        1.  

          When New Era's staffers began taking pictures of O'Keefe (including the photo embedded at left), Fenberg says, O'Keefe and a colleague went to their car and returned with a large video camera and a microphone. "If you want to take photos of us, we'll take photos of you," O'Keefe said, according to Fenberg, and the New Era staffers closed the door while O'Keefe and his friend tried to push it open and stick their microphone inside. Fenberg says New Era filed a police report about the incident.

          Funny. I have to assume that O'Keefe was already videotaping the New Era people when he said that. Now, presumably, O'Keefe has at least two sources of video of the same incident.

           

           

          1. Scott Gessler will obviously go on Fox News and condemn their attempts to compromise our election processes…right Scott?

            SoS Accountability in Elections website:

            http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/ACE/home.html

            SoS contact page: 

            http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/info_center/contact.html

            Elections & Voting

            Suite 200
            303-894-2200
            303-869-4861 (FAX)
            elections@sos.state.co.us

            Campaign Finance 
            303-894-2200 & press 3
            cpfhelp@sos.state.co.us

            Help America Vote Act (HAVA)
            SCORE
            Voter information
             

            Elections Staff Directory

      2. +20 Phoenix

        I agree that the most likely scenario is that these "volunteers" were plants – after O'Keefe flunked out at finding people to entrap, he went with "I'll just hire some people and get it over with."

        Or, as Phoenix suggests, the video has been so heavily edited and captioned that it has no resemblance to the actual conversation. This is what happened both with tO'Keefe's Shirley Sherrod statement, and with the "pimp at Planned Parenthood" video.

        It won't stop the rightie blogosphere from running with this story up until the election.  I would like to see criminal charges of entrapment and conspiracy to make election fraud pinned on O'Keefe.

  3. As with Caldara's stunt of questionable legality, even if O'Keefe somehow managed to motivate someone to go through all the effort to find, fill out and forge signatures on a few ballots, in the highly unlikely event they got past the county clerk, the impact on the election outcome would be precisely zero.

    It takes a sick, twisted (i.e. GOP) mind to invent these far out scenarios and then project them as common, everyday occurrences.

  4. This is the ultimate anti-democratic activity.  If you truly believe in democracy, then you believe in honest and fair elections, not pandering or entrapment or subverting the process.  He is despicable.

  5. This just shows that if you try to trick people into doing something stupid long enough and  targeting a large enough number of people you will run into one or two idiots. That's why so many of us still get the occasional e-mail, sent directly to spam, about how somebody in Africa has a bunch of money to transfer to us if we just pay a  little to facilitate. Even though these e-mails usually feature broken English and are obviously fraudulent, occasionally somebody bites.

    In this case, not only did the overwhelming majority not bite but the there's no way the couple of idiots could have been successful because we already have perfectly sufficient safeguards in place. There is no voter fraud problem requiring stricter measures than those we have. Everyone including the Rs pushing new restrictions knows it and everyone with more brains than a your average rock knows the entire effort is aimed entirely at suppressing Dem leaning votes. 

    O'Keefe should be charged with attempting to commit voter fraud via entering into a conspiracy.

    1. O'Keefe should indeed be charged with conspiracy to commit voter fraud, immediately. In addition, in law enforcement, such behavior as that exhibited by this anti-social misfit is called ENTRAPMENT, and is routinely dismissed by the courts.

      1. Outside of law enforcement it's just criminal behavior. Private citizens aren't protected from the consequences of illegal behavior by claiming they were running a sting operation. Try getting out of, say, enlisting fellow workers in an embezzling scheme at the bank you work at by saying, honest, I was just trying to uncover flaws for the greater good. That is if you're just a lowly teller. You can commit pretty much any crimes you want if you're high enough on the food chain.

  6. Hmmm….I was just looking at the envelope, and it requires full postage if dropped into the mail…Is that a poll tax??? Inquiring minds want to know…

    2. Probably not, since ballots can be dropped off without having to spring for postage.  There are also actual polling stations–you don't have to vote by mail if you don't want to.

      1. Hmm, DavidThi bragged that he regularly mailed his ballot sans-postage, saying the Post Office would deliver it anyway.  Not sure I would want to risk having it returned postage due after the election is over, however.

          1. I heard 70 cents, but when I placed it on a certified postage meter, it said 69 cents.  I said, what the hell, and slapped two stamps on it a week ago.

            But I do want to check on it's status — I'm in Adams county so I'll check it out tomorrow.

    3. However, since mailing it in is optional, I don't think it qualifies as a poll tax. You can drop it off at your County Clerk's or other center without paying a thing, which is what I always do. If you have no transportation to do so you can get someone who does to drop it off for you as long as they drop off no more than 10 at a time. You can also call your HD or county party and get someone to pick up and deliver your ballot. I'd say it's only a poll tax if you have to pay it in order to vote with no alternatives.

  7. Is the woman identified as a Greenpeace staffer actually a Greenpeace employee or is (was?) she one of the charity muggers that patrol the 16th Street Mall?

    2. Oh, man… "charity muggers." That's brilliant, I'm so ripping that off. Had one last night who looked like he was a couple days from his last sandwich asking me to sign to show my support for fracking. 

      Was clearly going to be a long night for him. I gave him a couple of apples I had on me.

  8. O'Keefe caught Democrat operatives telling people to get ballots in the trash in "ghetto Aurora."

    AND COLORADO POLS DOESN'T THINK THIS IS A PROBLEM? Unbelievable.

          1. So, I am assuming that anyone saying "ghetto Aurora" is not from the Denver area or wants to disrespect Aurora for nefarious purposes.

            In some ways I am so not in this century.

             

    2. For crying out loud modster.  Even if such a thing were really going on, how do you propose the would be fraudsters could manage to sign those ballots with signatures that would match the signatures of the registered voters to whom those ballots were sent? They do check, you know. You can stop pretending voter fraud is a real problem. Everyone, including the R ols pushing it as a problem in desperate need of a solution, knows it isn't  and is just an excuse for voter suppression and creating hysteria for base GOTV  and fundraising potential.  Give it up, already. The Republicans who would know if voter fraud were a real problem are the R county clerks and almost every single one of them says it's not.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

52 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!