Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez's highly controversial appropriation of the murder last year of the executive director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, Tom Clements, for use in his campaign has changed the outlook of this race with only days to go before the election. Beauprez's shrill and personal attacks on Gov. John Hickenlooper over Clements' death principally revolve around a 2011 law, Senate Bill 11-176, which Hickenlooper signed into law after it passed the Democratic-controlled Senate and Republican-held Colorado House.
Beauprez's use of SB11-176 to blame Hickenlooper for Clements' death has its origins in a front-page Denver Post story published in March of 2013, not long after the murder. What Beauprez doesn't mention is that this story was proven wrong the next day by competing outlet 9NEWS, forcing the Post to publish a particularly embarrassing correction:
This article has been corrected in this online archive. Originally, due to incorrect information from a source, the role a 2011 law played in Evan Ebel's early release from prison was overstated. [Pols emphasis] The law was only one factor.
Just days after Clements' murder, an unnamed Republican source had fed the story to the Denver Post that this 2011 law had resulted in the killer's early release from prison–with the obvious intention of extracting political value from the tragedy of Clements' death. As we've noted in the past, one cruel irony in Clements' shooting at the hands of a recently released solitary confinement inmate was the work Clements had been doing to reform the solitary confinement system in Colorado.
Like we said Friday, the politicization of Clements' death, or at least the attempt to do so, has been occurring almost since the day he was killed. Clements' murder came at the height of the debate on unrelated gun safety legislation in the General Assembly, and Republicans were keen to exploit anything they could find to portray Hickenlooper as "soft on crime."
But again: the story is false. The truth is, Clements' murderer was released four years early because of a clerical error by a sentencing court in 2008. This was the key detail the Post didn't have when they rushed to print with their story blaming SB11-176 for Ebel's release. Today, the Denver Post indirectly revisits that story reporting on the present controversy, and again misleads their readers:
Ebel killed Clements and Leon in March 2013 after he was released four years too early because of a courthouse clerical error after his conviction for assaulting a correctional officer in 2008. The error — which made Ebel's sentence for assaulting a prison guard concurrent instead of consecutive — occurred before Hickenlooper took office.
Ebel was released Jan. 30, 2013, instead of years later.
But Ebel also qualified for early-release sentence reductions while he was being held in administrative segregation based partly on a law signed in 2011 by Hickenlooper.
Ebel was released four months earlier than he would have based on those rewards, meaning that when he killed Leon and Clements, he would have still been in prison.
Now, whether the Post's Kirk Mitchell is trying to defend his own faulty reporting or his Republican source for what turned out to be bad information, it's just wrong to suggest that SB11-176 made any intentional difference in the release of Clements' murderer. The 2008 error of not sentencing Clements' eventual killer correctly is what resulted in both his release four years too soon, and the factoring of any sentence reduction based on the 2011 law. 9NEWS explains this clearly in their own story from Friday:
"Was director Clements' death tragic? Yes," wrote Beauprez campaign spokesman Allen Fuller. "Should that take the conversation of the governor's public safety policies off the table?"
Fuller pointed to a 2011 law signed by Governor Hickenlooper which allowed offenders like Ebel to earn time off for good behavior during solitary confinement . While this was a factor in the timing of Ebel's release from prison, it was a paperwork error from the courts that allowed Ebel to be released years before he was supposed to.
His earned time off wouldn't have been considered if his sentence was issued properly. [Pols emphasis]
The details of this story are complicated, and we're reticent to get too far into the weeds as political bloggers. But we feel it's important to show in this case exactly why Beauprez's allegations against Hickenlooper are wrong, and how bad reporting with suspected partisan political influence has already done the voting public a disservice.
Once you understand just how factually baseless Beauprez's attack on Hickenlooper is, the whole idea of blaming the governor for the murder of his friend and partner in reforming the corrections system in Colorado becomes something more than just politically inappropriate. This is in fact a travesty–and the reason it must not be rewarded has more to do with common decency than partisanship.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Hick Smacks Down Even More Straight-Up Lying From Amendment 80 Campaign
BY: cgrandits
IN: Here’s What YOU Think is Happening in Colorado’s Tightest Congressional Races
BY: joe_burly
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
It looks like the RGA hasn't completely lost hope in Both Ways. They're bringing Nathan Dunlap back out for another go around the track with an ad trashing Hick starring the father of one of the victims.
I guess this is to replace the ad politicizing a widow's grief? Stay classy BWB.
If you can't sell fear than double down by selling more fear.
This is the same shit Beauprez pulled in '06 with the illegal immigrant rapist ads. Beauprez is a pure lowlife. His campaigns are nothing but fear and sleaze.
Also, fuck the Denver Post. They are so compromised by their loyalties and biases that they can't report straight facts to save their lives. Cancel your subscription if you haven't already, and stop shopping at American Furniture Warehouse, which is the only thing left keeping the Post in business.
Don't you know? The Post political writers create their own facts.
From TNTSNBN:
You have to wonder who this is aimed at (pun intended). Most of the Republican die-hards who would fall for this kind of dishonest smear have already returned their ballots.
As shitty as the Denver Post political reporting has been there was one nugget at the end of the "news" piece alluding to the fact that Beauprez had no idea how he was going to pay for his "throw away the key" manifesto. Made no mention of how he was going to finance his get tough on law and order ideas.
GG: that's the legislature's problem.
The Governor would not set Dunlap free. That would be a pardon or a commutation. The Governor is proposing that Dunlap spend his life in jail.
Pardon would set him free. Commutation would change the sentence from death to life in prison. Hickenooper did neither; he just issued a temporary reprieve.
Missouri, Arizona, Oklahoma. That're why Dunlap still lives. The medications for the approved cocktail for death penalties is manufactured overseas. They won't sell it to us. They think (with some justification, alas), that we're a bunch of barbarians. No pharmaceutical company in the US is going to stand up and make this stuff for us, because once the country regains its senses, they would face 50 years of adverse publicity. Having pharmacists mix something up hasn't worked well (see Missouri, Oklahoma, Arizona). I doubt most people in Colorado want the kind of bad publicity that messing up an execution would bring us.
Why is the theater shooter still facing the death penalty when we can't get the stuff to kill him? Because Arapahoe County. I know.
It's crazy to watch the Post STILL trying to spin this bill to attack Democrats. Just stop. You're wrong. You got bad information from your GOP source.
While the Post editorial board tries to rise above this, the newsroom keeps earning the SAME condemnation the editorial board handed down to Beauprez. Perhaps the editorial board will condemn the newsroom?
I never thought I'd say this, but maybe Denver would be better off without a newspaper. We can get our news elsewhere, and if they are hurting more than helping inform the public, then fuck 'em.
I agree. I increasingly support the idea of Denver becoming a zero-newspaper town, if the piece of increasingly useless right-wing garbage Denver Putz is capable of serving as nothing more than another foXX nooZe-level propagandistic mouthpiece for the slimy GOTP. Good riddance.
I've convinced three long-term subscribers to cancel their Post subscriptions since their despicable, hypocritical endorsement of the fraud Teabagger Gardner, and I will continue trying to bag more.
It is growing more difficult to find honest reliable sources of information. The AFP and all the other right wing political groups are using hundreds of millions of dollars to buy up, leverage, or pressure every news media in the nation to sell their lies.
The public cannot know for certain if the info they are getting was generated by an honest person or a Republican hack (which is an antonym for honest person). The right wing has been lying through its collective teeth for so long, they wouldn't know the truth if it sat in their lap and called them "papa".
They should start printing the Denver Post on rolls of Charmin…then it could be used appropriately.