CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 25, 2016 12:44 PM UTC

Chaps, Alan Keyes Don't Trust Trump To REALLY Ban Muslims

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt, Donald Trump.
Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt, Donald Trump.

Here’s a clip from Colorado GOP Rep. Gordon “Dr. Chaps” Klingenschmitt’s most recent Pray in Jesus’ Name “Youtube ministry” broadcast, a fascinating exchange in an interview with conservative firebrand and former U.S. Senate candidate Alan Keyes–on the subject of GOP presidential frontrunner Donald Trump’s call to halt all immigration of Muslims into the United States:

CHAPS: Donald Trump has been saying, because of the terrorism problem, and we saw the recent shooting in San Bernardino, that Muslims should be excluded from immigrating or from even being given refugee status to America, until Congress can figure out what’s going on, if I’m paraphrasing him correctly. What does he mean by that or what do you think?

KEYES: I think that what he means by that is because you have in the Middle East a hotbed of terrorism, countries that are basically the centers and [unintelligible] for the development of people who carry out terrorism, that therefore we shouldn’t be importing the problem into the United States. And as a general formulation I agree with that. We shouldn’t be importing the people into the United States who are coming to this country to kill us and we never should have imported them.

But the problem, and if you have half an hour to spare you can watch the entire bug-eyed spectacle, is that Donald Trump won’t really ban those Muslims like he says! Keyes is definitely not a Trump fan, but it’s not because Trump says he wants to ban Muslims. As anyone who’s attended the Western Conservative Summit can tell you, lots of conservatives want to do that.

The takeaway: Trump is just telling you he wants to ban Muslims to earn your vote, America! Well not your vote, exactly, but the votes of the not-insubstantial number of Americans who want to ban Muslims, a segment which crosses over heavily with Republican primary voters. In the GOP presidential race today, the magic formula appears to be appealing to the same lowest-common-denominator interests Trump motivates while still having a way to morally differentiate one’s self from Trump.

Really, folks, who better on this Earth to sort it out for us than Rep. Gordon “Dr. Chaps” Klingenschmitt?

Comments

8 thoughts on “Chaps, Alan Keyes Don’t Trust Trump To REALLY Ban Muslims

  1. Banning immigrants solely on the basis of religion would be unconstitutional. What we could do is allow factors like religion to be part of a profile to screen potential threats like the Israelis do. Our political correctness forces grannies to be strip searched when we could use common sense.

    We do know that radical Islam is a violent ideology and it is not compatible with American values. We should not bar people on religion alone, but we should not be blind to the threats certain extremist religions may pose to safety.

    1. You pathetic lying sack of dung …

      … we all know that if grannies were actually ever being strip searched, you'd be first in line for season tickets and a reserved front row seating at DIA! …

      … I'm now completely convinced that it's not possible to be a moron of your magnitude naturally — you must have to work real hard to be so damn stupid; that, or take imbecile-enhancement steroids, or something?

    2. but we should not be blind to the threats certain extremist religions may pose to safety.  

      Well, we agree on that at least, Some of those fundamentalist, gun nut, Christian extremists are dangerous bastards and should be locked up……..

      1. The ones at the federal bird sanctuary would never have made it to lock up if they'd been wearing turbans or had dark colored skin. They'd have been dead weeks ago.

        1. Trump and Cruz have talked about admitting only Christian refugees from the Middle East. I'll submit that even Christians should be carefully screened. Saddam's long time vice president in Iraq was a Christian. Most Christians in Syria have supported the regime of "butcher" Assad. Maronite Christians in Lebanon have as much blood on their hands as do the Muslim factions in that country. 

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

63 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!