We’ve talked a couple of times already about the starkly conservative platform adopted last week at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. Where the GOP’s official party platform addressed rights for LGBT Americans, as ratified it was so far backward relative to the evolution of national sentiment on the issue that Colorado’s Republican attorney general pronounced herself “ashamed” at the direction her party was taking.
Cynthia Coffman may or may not have known how much of that platform was home-grown right here in Colorado:
The 2012 GOP platform calls same-sex marriage “an assault on the foundations of our society.” With the Republican Platform Committee not yet sharing updated language with reporters, it’s not clear if the 2016 platform will say that as well. But from a hotly debated amendment, it’s clear divisions in the GOP over gay marriage exist. First came an amendment offered by Colorado delegate Justin Everett: “Where it says ‘Children raised in a two-parent household,’ I want to insert before ‘two,’ ‘traditional….” [Pols emphasis]
That’s right: Colorado’s own Rep. Justin “Sleepy Dwarf” Everett was one of the driving forces behind the GOP platform’s hard lurch to the right in 2016, offering an amendment to insert the word “traditional” into a plank about how two-parent households are better off. By “traditional,” Everett of course means “Adam and Eve” and not “Adam and Steve.”
You get the idea.
But as you can see in this video clip from California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, Everett’s amendment drew an irate response from at least one Republican on the Platform Committee:
That raised the ire of New York delegate Annie Dickerson, who had lost other battles over same-sex marriage language in a subcommittee meeting earlier. “This is outrageous to suggest that children of a gay couple are more likely to be completely unbalanced and use drugs in droves and be criminals. This is so provocative.”
Nonetheless,
Other members questioned if the language insults single parents and the adult children of gay parents as well. But the vote of the 112-member committee endorsed adding the word “traditional.”
Like we said about Cynthia Coffman, we do believe that the anger expressed by RNC delegate Annie Dickerson over the unapologetically anti-LGBT language in the Republican Party’s 2016 platform is legitimate. Unfortunately, it appears to be the minority view within the Republican Party. That delegates approving the platform sided overwhelmingly with Everett against Dickerson is the story this year, not the ultra-minority who dissented.
If Republicans want to recover the support their platform will cost them this year by 2020, we suggest fewer Justin Everetts.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Duke Cox
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: xxyyzz
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: ParkHill
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
That's my state representative…..and just think, he's running opposed in November! It's pretty bad when Cynthia Coffman is ashamed by what you've done.
Does anyone know how hard you have to work for Cynthia Coffman to say I am ashamed of my party
Ok, there's a bunch of innuendo repeated in CoPols about the the Coffmans' bizarre living situation. Can someone please crack the code for me? What's the deal with them? Or at least the best guess?
I don't want to pass along unsubstantiated gossip. You'll just have to find your own gossipy Republican Insider. Mine's a neighbor I'd characterize as a former insider. He likes to talk political gossip while we’re doing work in our front yards or hitting the mail box.
Here's my best guess:
Sure says "I'll just slip into a more comfortable zip code" to me.
Their private lives are just that to me. My differences with them are over public policy.
Agree. Leave them alone about their marriage… none of our business.
Should we look the other way on the hypocrisy?
I'm not sure they are hypocrites on that point, Frank. Don't recall Mike or Cynthia beating the "all gays go to hell" drum. Yeah, their party does.
But Donald Trump let Caitlyn Jenner pee in the ladies room at Trump Tower. Honestly, isn't that progress enough for this decade?
"Unfortunately, it appears to be the minority view within the Republican Party."
It appears to be the minority view within the Platform Committee (who tend to be the most conservative of the delegation in many states, e.g. Tony Perkins), not necessarily the Republican Party as a whole.