A press release from Conservation Colorado yesterday throws support behind Initiative 75, the statewide ballot measure campaign that would enshrine rights of local communities to better control oil and gas development within their boundaries:
Conservation Colorado today endorsed Initiative #75, the ballot measure entitled “Local Government Authority to Regulate Oil and Gas Development.”
Conservation Colorado Executive Director Pete Maysmith released the following statement:
We have long believed that local governments should have a say in decisions directly affecting their communities, including if, when, and how drilling occurs within their borders. We made our position clear when we fought for this commonsense policy during our work with the governor’s oil and gas task force, our involvement with the Fort Collins Supreme Court case, and our advocacy for similar bills in multiple legislative sessions. Since little progress has been made in these arenas, we believe there is tremendous merit in putting this measure on the ballot and letting the voters decide.
As oil and gas development creeps closer to homes and schools, it’s critical that we empower local governments to better balance energy development with public health and safety. We are proud to lend our support and resources to this effort.
Initiative 75 is a direct response to court rulings invalidating local moratoria and bans passed by a number of northern Front Range cities in recent years. Another measure that would mandate a large setback between oil and gas and other development is also headed for the November ballot, but there is a growing consensus that the 2,500 foot requirement in that initiative is too large–a de facto ban on development of oil and gas in most of the state. The fact is, there is little political appetite for a wholesale ban on oil and gas development in Colorado, and large inflexible setbacks run counter to the “local control” message that has proven successful in cities that passed their own moratoria and bans.
But giving local governments back the power they lost in court after trying to protect themselves?
This measure has a very good shot at passing.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Bill Carson
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Gov. Polis Partly Walks Back Ill-Advised RFK Jr. Love
BY: The realist
IN: Heidi Ganahl’s Confusing Affirmations on Budget Cuts
BY: A Person
IN: Gov. Polis Partly Walks Back Ill-Advised RFK Jr. Love
BY: unnamed
IN: Heidi Ganahl’s Confusing Affirmations on Budget Cuts
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Heidi Ganahl’s Confusing Affirmations on Budget Cuts
BY: Meiner49er
IN: Gov. Polis Partly Walks Back Ill-Advised RFK Jr. Love
BY: itlduso
IN: Gov. Polis Partly Walks Back Ill-Advised RFK Jr. Love
BY: MartinMark
IN: Gov. Polis Partly Walks Back Ill-Advised RFK Jr. Love
BY: harrydoby
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Wow, this will be important to so many folks!
So, for folks in places like Weld County, nothing to see here.
That's what "local control" means. If Weld wants to breathe poison and drill their parks, so be it. Let Longmont protect itself.
So peoples' health and safety should be determined by their ability to come together in sufficient numbers to elect a government that cares about them. If they can't, fuck 'em.
Check.
If you have a better plan that can pass, please don't let me stop you. We probably don't disagree.
Oh, I don't know if a larger setback could pass, but as someone who has three nine-well pads within 2,500' of his home in Weld County, seeing stuff like "If Weld wants to breathe poison and drill their parks, so be it." sounds a little reductionist.
On the other hand, if my neighbors are luddites, I lose my property rights. Local control, like states rights, is a crap shoot.
19th century textile workers are fearsome . . .
. . . that's why I checked to make sure my HOA had strong anti-Luddite housing restrictions!
How are they about meth labs?
Luddite meth labs are strictly verboten.
Back to false equivalences, V. Setbacks, fugitive emissions and water quality standards aren't going to destroy the industry. We've heard the shrill response before
Now, about that embarrassingly low severance tax rate…
This is much better than the generalized local control initiative from the last go 'round.