CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 27, 2016 04:51 PM UTC

Has Coffman become less hostile to LGBT people? Or Just his website?

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Rep. Mike Coffman (R).
Rep. Mike Coffman (R).

Rep. Mike Coffman has purged his official website of an article showing his support of the anti-LGBT “don’t-ask-don’t-tell” policy, which allowed gays to serve in the military only if they kept their sexual orientation secret.

At least until June 14, Coffman’s “Media Center” section of his website displayed a Feb. 3, 2010, USA Today opinion column by Coffman titled, “Don’t Interject Sexuality.”  You can see the page cached on Google here.

Just as Coffman once scrubbed “comprehensive immigration reform” from a portion of his website, the don’t-ask-don’t-tell article is now gone from the Congressman’s site, even though other opinion articles by Coffman remain there from as far back as 2009.

Coffman’s article stated:

The determination to accomplish the mission, along with the will to survive, welded the unit into an effective ground combat team: An interdependent bond was formed between each and every Marine in the unit.

That strong interdependent bond held our ground combat team together and made us into an effective fighting unit. The bond was founded upon a mutual trust: Although each Marine could be singled out for a task that could put his life at risk, Marines would always have the confidence that the orders given to them on the battlefield were never tainted by any emotional bias.

U.S. Marine Corps ground combat teams are composed of men only. Interjecting sexuality into a ground combat team potentially creates an emotional divide between Marines that undermines confidence and prevents that interdependent bond from forming, ultimately compromising the combat effectiveness of the unit.

We need a very deliberative and reasoned approach before considering a repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” a proven policy that has served the military and the nation well since 1993.

It’s unclear whether the scrubbing of this article means Coffman has changed his position in support of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which is discriminatory and has been repealed.

If he’s changed his position, why? Maybe Coffman’s office, which doesn’t respond to me, will return another reporter’s call to explain.

And while he’s at it, maybe he’ll also explain why he no longer favors banning all abortion, even for rape and incest. As far as I can tell, reporters have yet to ask for details on why he abandoned this position.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Has Coffman become less hostile to LGBT people? Or Just his website?

  1. Coffman went to the Orlando Vigil at Tracks.  Many observed that he felt quite uncomfortable in the situation.  His "wife," on the other hand, gave moving remarks.

     

  2. When "Don't Ask, Don't Tell was introduced, I wrote an article saying Don't Ask, Don't Tell Isn't Fair, Won't Work.."   And so it was proved to be.  Yet, fairness requires us to note that at the time it was introduced, it was a liberal reform, replacing the old rule of actively hunting for gays and expeling them.   To have supported it at the time was certainly not anti gay.   The policy has now, rightly, beensuperceded by one stating that gay Americans have the same right to be killed and maimed as their straight brothers and sisters. But to assail mike for taking down an article supporting what was initially an interim reform seems to be like a cheap shot.  I know Mike Well.  He is not anti-gay. 

    1. True, that. Same position as Bill Clinton who also supported the Defense of Marriage. Lots of things to criticize in Coffman's policy stands but it wasn't that long ago that most Dems, much less Rs, couldn't have imagined that we'd be where we are today on these issues in such a short amount of time. 

    2. Coffman voted against repealing it; he wasn't just against it initially. And we don't know his actual position on it now. We just know he took down this article. I hope you're right, and he should explain himself to clarify things.

      1. I want to hear Coffman explain his position on lots of issues, starting with his views on Donald Trump.  Where is the media when we need them? (snark)

        Thank you, Jason for your work.

        1. Remember his answers on  hi statement that Obama wasn't a real American? His apologies, apologies for the apologies, new apologies, new apologies for the apologies? And that's not even counting the robotic single talking point refusal to answer anything at all? I pretty much agreed with V's single point on a technicality. We all know Coffman is too politically spineless to get definite on anything that touches serious controversy.  Maybe physically too. That might explain the shoulder blades and up only push ups.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

69 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!