“Quarrels end, but words once spoken never die.”
–African proverb
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: harrydoby
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: kwtree
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Delta County’s Rep. Matt Soper Opposes Birthright Citizenship
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
it will gradually become clear that the minority had a pretty good session, both in the house and the senate. The squeaky wheels, particularly in the Senate, managed to accomplish much of their agenda and monkeywrench the majority on a great deal of theirs. Often very very publicly.
Kudos to Mike May and Josh Penry for doing a helluva job.
I listen to the legislature a lot, and all I heard was “no.”
The best agenda one can have is opposing the lunatics on the left.
anyone dust for finger prints at the site of the attempted Pinnacol burglary?
anyone notice the bloated state salaries (I’m talkin management here) and their bloated PERA pensions. They come no where near those seen by private sector managers?
ah, not to worry we have billions, I say billions, in bailout money headed to Colorado.
Greedy government. Oh well, they will just steal your hard earned money to keep their perks.
That’s a shitload of perks, then, isn’t it?
Then do some searches on various departments like Local Affairs, Regulatory, AG, Human Services, CDOT, Labor ….
Most Regulatory heads make in the low 100s. Even with PERA perks, that’s a far cry from upper executive management at private firms.
… “even with Pera perks” … brother you need to question just who and how many people (mid management to front line management) get 50-80% of their base pay at retirement when their salaries are no where near the states.
Comparing the Guv, AG, Treasurers salary to the top 100 Colorado executives would be a fair assessment.
Comparing low end managers to the top 100 is way off base.
In terms of your outrage for really wealthy people, you should support a general asset tax for anyone with more the $100 million in worldwide assets. I know that would catch hedge fund owners like Soros and billionaire offspring like Stryker … but think of the redistribution outcomes that could be achieved.
CDOT is a billion-dollar organization. In comparison to hospital directors or similarly-situated managers (in terms of assets and employees), their retirement base pay plus their organizational pay during their time in office doesn’t compare. Not even close.
My outrage for really wealthy people…haha. I actually support a strengthening of the estate tax that exempts farms worth up to $15 million. I don’t have any problem with the wealthy like Warren Buffett, who built his own company. I don’t think that someone should be worth billions just because their sperm was the fastest.
Add a couple more levels to the progressive tax structure and you’ll have me on board. I do think that 95% of people should pay lower taxes. Remember when Coolidge increased the highest tax rate to 90% (on all income over 100 million, I believe). Drop taxes for those making under $50,000 a year to 3-4%. Eliminate deductions. Simplify the system.
Asset taxes discourage investment. You should know that. Your penchant for hyperbole just reinforces your hackery.
is not working out so well for Rs in DC or Denver. Opposing without offering substantial alternatives begins to sound too much like impotent whining and the voting public gets tired of it. So my advice, as a Dem: Please stick with it.
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_1…
What say you posters? Screw it just terminate the Dept of Ed?
Imagine the rage you’d see posted here if Bruce Benson, Tim Foster, Kay Norton or Joe Blake proposed terminating a subsidy like this?
It’s not eliminate the loans, it’s have all the loans run directly through the federal government. The 94b is what is saved while providing the same level of loans to students.
It’s a win-win-lose. The students win (more money for loans). The taxpayers win (94b saved). The private loan companies lose (no more guaranteed profit).
oh wait he is a banker
Interestingly I didn’t see Benson’s name in the article, just some Colorado Department of Higher Ed person.
Why won’t Secretary Skaggs come out of the closet on this, is he afraid to oppose Obama?
Too many crazies.
This might explain why some schools oppose it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v…
Thank goodness the GA doesn’t meet year round.
Thank goodness its sine die!
I’m drinking – beginning at lunch and not stopping until Elvis has left the building.
that he’d go away and take Rowland with him.
.
I think the new President has done a good job of laying out the challenges faced,
and charting a course to fixing them:
http://somalitalkradio.com/200…
Whats more, I think he deserves our support.
Did you like Bush’s war of choice in Iraq ?
Well, if we act now, we won’t have to deal with a parallel situation in the Horn of Africa.
Stay the course we’re currently on, and Obama too gets to campaign as a “War President.”
.
… nor its base (somaliatalkradio.com). Is it extraordinarily slow?
.
you may be on the “carnivore” list,
meaning that any of your attempts to contact suspicious sites is fed through a wiretapping process that can bog the transmission down. Do you happen to be a right wing-nut extremist that DHS considers to be a terrorist threat ?
The CIA funds a couple of radio stations in Somalia, but I don’t think this is one of them, so contacting this station would be suspicious.
Its a 19-page pdf, outlining the plans of the new president of Puntland, Farole, who was elected in January 2009.
Puntland is the “autonomous state” that most of the pirate attacks are launched from.
I can email it to you, but I don’t have your address. I can be reached at Stabilize_Iraq @t yahoo.dot communist.
While it is nominally addressed to the people of Puntland, it looks to be written for consumption by Americans and Europeans (are Japanese considered European ?)
It makes a pretty good case for investing in development rather than increased militarization,
and for investing in the parts of Somalia that are relatively stable (Puntland and Somaliland,) not just in the ungoverned expanses where the Islamists and warlords are duking it out.
There was a donor conference in Brussels last month. They raised Euro 200 M. It is earmarked 66% for African Union troops to protect the imaginary “National Unity Government” (TFG) and 34% for training security forces for the same TFG.
With 1/3 of the population of Somalia proper (within the marked borders of the “country” Somalia) actually living in Puntland, and another 1/3 in Somaliland, these independent regions are trying to get a fair share of the booty.
.
and gotten me off whatever list, as I am now able to view the document in question. I happen to have an interest in Puntland (“Fourth down and JO with 10 to go….”) so I shall read it with interest. Thanks.
Meantime, my information–or misinformation, as the case may be– is that in 2002 the U.S. based about 800 troops at Camp Lemonier (aka Le Monier, or just Monier when you’re in a hurry) on the site of a former French base by the same name, comprising about 55 acres; and that in in 2006 the U.S. and Djibouti agreed to a five-year lease that expanded the base to almost 500 acres and doubled the number of U.S. troops stationed there. Nice income stream for a country most folks think is in the Newborns and Infants Department at Macy’s.
But I believe you’re right that no one in East Africa is straining to jump to the head of the queue to get U.S. troops stationed on their territory first (though I suspect a few American Special Force accents can be found in Ethiopia).
[Technicality of “lease” vs “base” not entirely material to the discussion, admittedly; suggest file under “Nah nah na nah nah”–OR under “JO got it wrong again” (thin file, I know, but…). One of those details, though, either way, that people later ask: “How come no one told us????”]
Wouldn’t want ignorance of what you’re talking about prevent a comment, of course!
Establishment of the Africa Command in 2007 didn’t seem to generate too much publicity at the time, nor did expansion of US base in Djibouti.
It raises the question about the extent to which Obama is determined to steer U.S. foreign policy in a different direction post-Iraq, post-Cold War. Certainly I don’t get much sense of that from his SoS; and the fact that he stuck with Gates at the Pentagon might also be counted as evidence of a good deal more continuity that one would wish.
Is there a Stealth Policy behind the Public Persona? I’d hate to sober up this early in the day.
[Incidentally, you’re an asshole, a dick, diarrhetic vomitic, and a hunka nuthin’ if you’re tempted to criticize or disagree with anything I have said, am saying, or will say in the future–just to make that clear and get it out of the way at the outset.]
.
The US doesn’t really have a base in Djibouti. We lease a portion of the base that the French Foreign Legion has at Camp Lemonier.
In fact, in 2006 – 07, the US military went asking our friends and allies in Africa for a piece of land upon which to build the headquarters for US Africa Command.
The official DoD position is that every nation we asked said NO, afraid of a return to the colonialism of the last century. I suspect that some were willing, but we found the price (in terms of propping up tyrants) was too high.
AFRICOM is based, for the time being, in Stuttgart, Germany. Well, at least that’s closer to its assigned AOR (Area of Responsibility) than Tampa-St. Pete is to Iran. Central Command has its official headquarters at McDill AFB, Florida.
I’ve recently been in contact with AFRICOM officials, offering to help arrange a facility in the AOR, and they’ve asked me to butt out. I’ll bet they’ve got a secret plan.
.
.
saying that he thought the Clintonesque triangulation on these unwinnable wars was coopting the far left war opponents, while bringing conservative war supporters into the fold.
Four more Wars !
.
Looks like Obama waffled again. His administration is NOT going to go after Bush on criminal charges for torture.
I as a multiple personality disorder person am outraged that we elected Obama to get even with these people and he is refusing to do so.
Sorry the lobotomy didn’t work out for you.
What happened to your little blog? Either your local paper kicked your link off of their site or you finally threw in the towel. Which is it? Did you get fired or did you quit?
Sorry you’re too stupid to find it.
I never knew you had a blog, but I might jump from a link if you posted one.
.
and heavily moderated.
To date, only one participant.
.
His local paper used to carry a link. But they apparently decided carrying his link next to the dozen or so other blog links was in poor taste.
Can you post a link to show that the Obama administration was going to
Ha ha ha ha. Just kidding I know you can’t.
You can’t back up anything you post.
Despite Obama’s earlier statements that “the administration” wants to put torture behind us (if only we could!), he lacks the authority to call the attorney general off any prosecutions. That’s what the Bush administration got into some trouble for, excessive interference in DOJ prosecutions by the White House. So in spite of the lies of Michael Dorsett, this is neither decided yet nor anything Obama can decide.
Translation: He passed the buck. Obama couldn’t handle the heat so he did what he always does – passes it off on someone else because he can’t handle the heat.
That is how the executive branch is set up.
I know you’re not used to Presidents actually following the letter of the law, but you’ll eventually grow accustomed to it over the next 8 years.
but it’s an unfair insult to idiots everywhere.
This from a self described Twit.
If you were, you would realize that CT’s name is actually a clever pun.
I think it’s time to switch sock puppets again. This one is getting a little old.
.
until I read that, I didn’t get the screen name pun. Once you mentioned it, bing! the light went on.
.
from the part of the state with the resources but not the votes. And those we have we squander on people like Laura Bradford and Craig Meis.
If you were really from Colorado, you would understand Club’s screen name and wouldn’t be making childish remarks about it. And yes, you don’t understand how the federal government works, but thanks for pretending to.
I know how government is supposed to work under the constitution. But, ok, under Obama I am among the millions that have no clue how it is going to work. Perhaps you can enlighten us. Or, maybe we have to look to Stalin to understand this “new” government.
Go figure.
from CNN
Apparently speaking ill of Rush is grounds for being kicked out of the party.
.
who believes that Colin Powell ever believed in the GOP ?
.
…that makes him worse than H1N1 with the “real” Republican Party.
I wonder if he thought he could restore some sanity to the Repubs….he’s probably thinking about taking the Fat Drug Addict’s advice.
If his wife hadn’t been afraid he would be assassinated, he probably would have beat Bill Clinton.
You could probably say the same thing about John McCain too, and he was the nominee.
The group of people who state their religious preference as “none” historically has been very small — hovering between 5 percent and 10 percent. However, new survey [in link below] says the percentage of “nones” has now skyrocketed to between 30 percent and 40 percent among younger Americans.
The nones outnumber the nuns, evidently. Could yet another myth about Maine-stream thinking be biting the dusty trail, riding off into the sunset, or whatever? http://abcnews.go.com/Politics…
Hi;
Please do not answer after 7:00am 5/7 (Thursday morning).
I’m interviewing the head of the SBA here tomorrow morning. Any suggested big picture questions for him?
thanks – dave
.
One aspect of the SBA mission, not the only one, is federal contracts. Maybe one of these piques your interest. I don’t need an answer to any of these, but I thought this might help you prep.
I don’t know anything about their loan programs, having been laughed out of their office the only time I tried to apply. But that might be the area most people are interested in.
……………
In 2004-05, a rumor went around that there would be a new preference program for GLBT-owned small businesses. Is that in the works ?
In 2005, there was a rumor that SBA was going to set government-wide goals for percent of business (dollars) awarded to Woman-owned small businesses. There are percentage goals for Veteran-owned (3%,) 8(a) (5%,)and all Small Businesses (26%.)
Those are based on the numbers of businesses owned by the different groups. Well, women own something like 30% of all businesses. Any new developments on that front ?
In early 2009, DOD sent out a memo http://www.acq.osd.mil/osbp/po… saying to stop using race-based preferences for Historically Black Colleges and Universities. I’m not sure, but it may have also applied to “Small Disadvantaged Businesses,” which used to mean minority-owned small businesses. This was based on a decision of the US District Court for the Western District of Texas. Is that going to be applied to the rest of federal agencies ?
With Ted Stevens gone, is there any chance of rolling back the scam where multi-billion dollar enterprises that are owned by Alaskan Native Corporations are allowed to get contracts set-aside for small business in the 8(a) program ?
SBA defines “small business” by some size standards published by the Department of Commerce. As it now stands, in some industries, a company can have an annual turnover of $200 Million and still be considered small. They can have 1500 employees and still be considered small.
The SBA mostly helps what I would consider mid-sized companies.
Any chance of any new program specifically set up to help businesses that are actually small (what SBA has sometimes called “microbusinesses ?”)
.
Very good question.
I was told that they are “working on” specifics for woman owned and nothing about GLBT when I talked to someone awhile ago.
Does he love his children?
How many daughters does he have? If he doesn’t have three, does he wish he did?
Is he really interested in his work?
How dedicated is he to public service? Does he put in long hours?
Does he believe small business fuels the economy?
Does he follow political blogs? Has he read any of your other interviews?
Is he grateful you’re taking the time to interview him? How grateful?
Are there some things he really hopes to accomplish?
If he were a tree, what kind would it be?
I take it you think my questions in the past have been too hard hitting 🙂
Does he exclusively run free software written by volunteers in their spare time on his agency’s computer(s)? How about his personal computer at home?
Does he rely on amateur volunteers to run his office? How long does will it be until he does so?
Does he agree that a CEO can do any damn thing without training or practice, single-handedly?
Does he prefer it when interviewers ask easy questions, or when they don’t ask any questions at all?
Does he eat marshmallows right out of he bag, or melted on the end of a stick?
It is thoughtful incisive questions like these that help improve the quality of the interviews.