President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

52%↑

48%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

60%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Winners and Losers of 2012: Losers

After a few days of reflection, here is our list of losers from the 2012 election cycle in Colorado. Find our list of winners here.

1. Mitt Romney and Colorado Advisors

Mitt Romney’s campaign efforts in Colorado never made much sense to us. Romney spent far too long early in the campaign visiting traditionally beet-red, but more importantly under-populated areas of the state, allowing the battle for suburban votes to shift toward President Barack Obama. Some 85% of Colorado voters live along the Front Range between Ft. Collins and Pueblo, which we would think is fairly common knowledge at this point. At one point at the end of the summer, Romney had gone more than 30 days between visits to our state.

Later, Romney made a disastrous mistake by declaring himself opposed to the wind power production tax credit, which is tied to thousands of manufacturing jobs in Colorado–even though almost all Republicans in the state supported it. By the time Romney began to “Etch-a-Sketch” himself into a moderate candidate for the general election, he had already radicalized himself in the eyes of too many Colorado voters. Once that was done, his attempts to walk back from the hard-right positions he took in the primary looked disingenuous and fed distrust.

But above all, Republican supporters of Romney in Colorado disastrously internalized their own spin, and convinced themselves that polls showing Obama steadily regaining, then holding his lead in Colorado from mid-October onward were “skewed.” This false sense of security, combined with the Obama campaign’s world-beating field campaign, yanked the rug out from under Romney’s feet in a state that consistently ranked as one of the most competitive.

2. Frank McNulty

Outgoing Colorado House Speaker Frank McNulty will go down in history as one of the most divisive, Machiavellian, and ultimately self-destructive leaders in the history of the state. Taking a one-seat majority in 2010 by the barest of electoral margins, McNulty acted as if this was a mandate for the “Tea Party.” Abusing and manipulating legislative rules to an extent nobody we know can remember a match for, McNulty ruthlessly carried out a partisan, obstructionist game plan in the House against the Democratic Senate and Governor’s office.

But McNulty’s arrogance was his own undoing. McNulty lost control of the legislative reapportionment process through his own bad faith, resulting in maps that dramatically reduced the number of “safe” seats for either party. Then McNulty turned the 2012 legislative session into a nationwide controversy when he shut down debate just before civil unions legislation would have passed his chamber with bipartisan support.

As a result, outside money poured into key legislative races, and Democrats used the story of the shutdown of the legislature against Republican House candidates all over the state. Today, not even a candidate for GOP House minority leadership, the implosion of Frank McNulty’s political career is pretty much complete.

House Democratic Majority Leadership Elections Today

UPDATE #3: From Speaker-designee Mark Ferrandino’s email to supporters moments ago:

With your help, on Tuesday night we were able to not only win back the majority in the Colorado State House, but do it with a broad margin. While all that is needed for Majority is 33 seats, we will enter the January session with 37 members.

We know that the election is just a beginning. We have much work to do keep our economy moving forward and restore the hope that Coloradoans have in their government.  We do not take the responsibility lightly. Through collaboration with our Republican colleagues, the state House is going to accomplish great things for Colorado by working with Governor Hickenlooper and the state Senate.

We are going to take any idea – Democratic, Republican, Independent – that will move Colorado forward. It was clear on Tuesday night that the people of Colorado rejected the politics of gridlock and hyperpartisanship that brought the business of the people to a halt in this last year. Democrats are going to lead in a different direction – forward.

—–

UPDATE #2: FOX 31’s Eli Stokols:

Colorado Democrats elected Rep. Mark Ferrandino to be the new Speaker of the House Thursday – the first time in state history that a gay lawmaker will preside over the Colorado House of Representatives.

Democrats won control of the House in Tuesday’s elections.

Ferrandino, D-Denver, previously served as the minority leader, and was easily promoted to the top power spot by his fellow Democrats.

Choking up he told his fellow lawmakers “I couldn’t dream when I was in high school that I’d be standing here.”

But equality wasn’t the only winner on Tuesday, Ferrandino said. The large 37-28 majority taken by Democrats in the House was also a boon for Ferrandino’s party.

“We (Democrats) were in good position to take back the majority,” Ferrandino said. “We only needed one seat, and we hoped we’d get that and a little more. But we didn’t think every competitive seat would go our way.”

—–

UPDATE: Rep. Mark Ferrandino elected Speaker; Rep. Dickey Lee Hullinghorst elected House Majority Leader, Rep. Dan Pabon as assistant majority leader.

—–

At 10AM this morning, the newly-elected Colorado House Democratic Majority will join together for the first time to elect their caucus’ leadership. Rep. Mark Ferrandino is expected to become the state’s first openly gay Speaker of the Colorado House.

We’ll update with statements, other elected leadership once available.

Jefferson County Republicans Not Attending Forums. Should They Be?

In races for the state legislature across Jefferson County, many Democratic candidates are showing up to forums and then left alone to debate themselves. Their Republican opponents, according to a press release from the Jefferson County Democratic Party, simply can’t be bothered to join in.

From the Jeffco Dems:

Republican Candidates “Unavailable” for League of Women Voters Forums

Six of the Nine Republican Legislative Candidates Don’t Show Up

After opting not to sponsor state legislative campaign debates in 2010, the historically nonpartisan League of Women Voters of Jefferson County scheduled a series of four candidate forums ahead of the 2012 election. At the first three forums, held in Evergreen, Arvada, and Lakewood, Republican candidates were notably absent in the two most competitive Senate Districts and four most competitive House Districts in Jefferson County. All Democratic candidates were present, as were some of the Libertarian candidates.

After the forums in Arvada and Lakewood, crowds were left wondering why so many of the Republicans failed to show up. In Arvada, a camera crew was present to film the forum, but with the Republicans absent, it was decided that the forum could not be televised [Pols Emphasis].

“I was very disappointed that so many of the Republican candidates didn’t respect and honor us enough to explain their positions,” said Lakewood resident Lesley Matschke, who had been a registered Republican her whole life until changing her affiliation to Democratic in September.

Another Lakewood resident, Margene Stroup, commented that, “It sounds like they got together and decided not to show up. It reminds me of the stealth campaigns in the 1990s when Republicans were trying to take over school boards across the nation.”

Public forums for state legislative candidates are generally not well attended [Pols Emphasis], but remain one of the few places where engaged citizens can see these candidates side-by-side. Prior to the League of Women Voters forums, candidates were invited to forums hosted by the Arvada Chamber of Commerce on August 17th and by the Jefferson County Business Lobby on September 14th.

The only remaining forum is to be held on Thursday, October 11th, from 7:00-9:00pm at Saint Phillip Lutheran Church (7531 S Kendall Blvd, Littleton). Candidates have been invited from Senate District 22 and House Districts 22, 25 and 28.

The Dems are justified in their complaints about their Republican counterparts, but one strongly-worded press release won’t make a difference one way or another. That no single Republican legislative candidate has shown up to any side-by-side forums indicates that this is a deliberate move by their strategists. Worse yet for the Democrats, it’s a good one.

As the press release above (strangely) points out, nobody attends forums like these. This isn’t the national stage, where side-by-side comparisons enable candidates to establish — and lose — momentum. Sure, a few voters may walk away with a better idea of their choices down-ballot, but they number so few that it’s hard to justify scheduling time for a forum that could be better used raising money or knocking on doors. Not to mention that the people who have time to sit in the audience of these types of things have likely already made up their minds.

Debates are risky, too. Candidates are forced to come face to face with their opponent. Though most of those exchanges end amicably, it’s still an uncontrolled situation, heightening the potential for blunders, gaffes, and other “Macaca” moments that can make their way into the papers or onto a mail piece. If there were greater returns, it’d be a risk worth taking. For a handful of votes, though? Not a chance.

Some would say, the Jeffco Dems no doubt included, that the Republicans are appearing cowardly and out-of-touch by not attending these events. Perhaps, but to whom? There’s been no coverage of their absences or of the forums overall. The one time a “camera crew” did show up, it opted not to roll footage because the Republicans weren’t there. There’s patently no downside of not attending these events and little benefit to showing up.

Countless politicians over the years have levied the “afraid to debate” charge against their opponents, but it very rarely sticks unless the media pick up and incessantly repeat the narrative. And, with ballots going out in a few days, there are simply more compelling stories to tell.

Why Politics and Friendship Don’t Always Mix

Political patronage is as old as our current conception of democracy itself. That’s because there’s nothing necessarily wrong with awarding jobs to friends and supporters upon taking office — those who have continually offered their support, after all, are also capable of offering sage advice and grounding a candidate once they’re elected.

In the case of Denver Mayor Michael Hancock’s friend and former staffer Wayne McDonald, however, lies an important lesson: Don’t appoint friends to political or advisory positions unless you’re confident they’re both capable of doing the job well and positive that they won’t paint your administration in a bad light. McDonald, Hancock’s college classmate, was dismissed from his position as the mayor’s “special projects” coordinator after allegedly sexually harassing a female Denver police officer with whom he had a professional relationship.

McDonald now plans to file suit against the city to clear his name, but neither that potential litigation nor the circumstances surrounding McDonald’s dismissal were sufficient cause for Hancock to end their personal friendship, according to a recent report at Westword.

From Sam Levin:

McDonald is a longtime friend of the mayor; he was appointed as a “special projects coordinator” but fired in May, after allegedly making inappropriate comments in front of a female Denver police officer. His legal team has filed a notice of claim, and plans to file the official lawsuit in the next month or so. In addition, his attorney, Anne Sulton, has also filed an Ethics Board complaint, on view below. Sulton says he asked for an investigation before he was fired, and is now requesting one via the upcoming lawsuit and the ethics complaint.

But questions of unemployment benefits are not the only concerns Sulton raises when she is asked to respond to the mayor’s comments.

“I know that since my client has been fired, [Hancock] has been calling [McDonald] and his wife and sending text messages to my client,” she said.

In our brief chat yesterday, Hancock told us he has not spoken to McDonald in a while, and that may be true, Sulton said, pointing out that to the best of her knowledge, McDonald has not responded to any of the mayor’s messages.

“I think it’s highly inappropriate for the mayor to be calling the man’s wife and sending texts to my client,” she said.

By Sulton’s estimate, the mayor has reached out to McDonald and his family at least three times with texts and calls — mostly in the immediate aftermath of firing him. When pressed on the matter back in June, Hancock told reporter, “We’re still friends.” [POLS Emphasis]

This story has always contained an element of the absurd. A close friend of the mayor’s, appointed to a relatively senior position within the administration, allegedly harassed a female police officer. It’s a compelling story for a lot of reasons, chief among them is the fact that Hancock should’ve dealt with this issue on a personal level. Nobody knows went on behind closed doors, but if Hancock had made a personal appeal rather than assigning two functionaries to tell McDonald, as Levin reports, to resign or “be fired,” there’s a good chance the latter could’ve left with both his personal and Hancock’s professional reputations intact.

Unfortunately, the time for personal appeals was over the second McDonald was forced out of his job. Hancock may believe that he and McDonald are “still friends,” but they aren’t. Their “friendship” ended when their professional involvement did. Setting aside the lawsuit, McDonald became toxic to the administration when he was fired for inappropriate conduct. Even if Hancock would like to stay friends, he certainly can’t do it publicly without calling into question his rationale for hiring McDonald in the first place. It’s an unfortunate reality in politics that sometimes “friends” get in the way of governing. That’s certainly the case here.

No matter how guilty Hancock felt about having to let his friend go, or rather, having his staff let his friend go, he should not have attempted to communicate with McDonald after the fact. Period — no texts, no phone calls, no e-mails. By staying in touch with his old college pal, Hancock directly links himself to what should otherwise be a personnel issue.

Reaching out makes Hancock look like a guy reluctantly forced to end a relationship with an old flame: “Listen, you can’t work here anymore, but we can still be friends, right?” Hancock almost seems guilty for what he had no choice but to do.

If Hancock wanted to keep McDonald as a friend, he shouldn’t have hired him in the first place. This far in, however, he can’t simultaneously maintain the friendship without jeopardizing his image as mayor.

That would seem like common sense to most politicians, but with Hancock, it’s just another piece of evidence that he hasn’t yet figured out what he should and should not do in his position.

LA Times Features Lakewood, Bob Murphy

Concomitant with Jeffco’s increasing importance as a swing county this election cycle is increased media attention on local communities. Little wonder, then, that the Los Angeles Times profiled Lakewood voters just a day before Mitt Romney delivered an address in South Jeffco.

From the Los Angeles TimesDon Lee:

LAKEWOOD, Colo. – Summer Tangeman embodies the Rocky Mountain lifestyle and the independent spirit of voters in the suburban areas that make up the swing vote in this closely divided state.

A 38-year-old physician’s assistant, she runs, loves the outdoors, identifies with neither political party and finds the partisan bickering of Washington disgusting, especially when she looks at her own economic situation. She’s been laid off twice in the last 18 months, most recently in May.

Tangeman doesn’t blame President Obama. But she’s having a hard time getting over the fact that, for her, there’s simply been no recovery.

“It’s not been so good for me,” she says, her face drenched in sweat after a long morning run along the trails of Green Mountain.

Her assessment captures the mood of many voters as they contemplate the central issue of the 2012 presidential campaign: Obama’s record on the economy. Republican leaders blame Obama for unemployment stuck at the highest levels in decades. Democrats counter that no president could have overcome the worst economic crisis in more than 60 years in just one term and that Obama’s policies prevented the country from sliding into a full-scale depression. Like Tangeman, many voters in the middle express ambivalence.

Administration officials can claim some success with manufacturing, where exports and overall employment have expanded. But their record is poorer on small business, which has been particularly hurt by the problems of the housing market since many owners of small companies use their homes as collateral to get loans.



Many of those effects, for both good and ill, can be seen in this city of 144,000 in Denver’s western suburbs. Mayor Bob Murphy [Pols Emphasis] said about $2 million from the stimulus program, known formally as the American Recovery Act, went directly into his town, to fix playgrounds and sidewalks and put energy-efficient systems in public buildings. Residents also benefited from $170 million in stimulus money to renovate the Denver Federal Center, a 90-building campus in Lakewood where 6,200 government employees work.

“I shudder to think of the scenario absent the stimulus plan,” said Murphy, a registered Democrat although his position is nonpartisan.

Yet things remain tough for many. Unemployment is stuck above 8% in Colorado and for the U.S. as a whole. And with good jobs scarce and housing prices still soft, many families are continuing to lose ground. More than 2,800 K-12 students in Lakewood and other towns in Jefferson County are considered homeless, up from 2,200 two years earlier.

As election day inches closer, the national lens will almost certainly continue to focus on Jeffco and competitive counties like it around the country.

For folks like Lakewood Mayor Bob Murphy, however, locally-focused mass media election coverage may prove to be more burden than boon. Murphy has been quoted twice in the last month on issues relating to the presidential campaign — once on NPR during the Democratic National Convention and in the Times‘ article above. Although Murphy certainly deserves some attention for his leadership in Lakewood, there’s no question that being interviewed about a hyper-partisan national election makes him squirm.

Lakewood’s mayor, after all, eschews partisan titles and avoids overtly political activity like the plague. That media outlets are now qualifying his title with “registered Democrat” overlooks the broader nature of local governance in Jeffco in search of compelling nuggets relating to the national race.

It’s about time Murphy receives some national validation for his efforts in Lakewood’s top job. It’s unfortunate, however, that hishis newfound political relevance is tied to the presidential horse race.

Where is John Odom?

Jefferson County Commissioner John Odom has been invisible on the campaign trail this year, raising pittance for his re-election bid and spending little of the $20,000 he loaned his own campaign. And, aside from the spirited introduction he gave to Mitt Romney when the Republican swung by Jefferson County in early August, Odom hasn’t done much in line with traditional political strategy: No speeches, no fundraisers, and no field effort to speak of.

Even when given a free opportunity to define his candidacy and connect with voters, Odom couldn’t find the time.

From the Columbine Courier:

The economy and the climate for Jeffco businesses were discussed by 11 political hopefuls from across the county last Friday morning at a candidates forum sponsored by the Jefferson County Economic Development Corp.

The forum, at the Holiday Inn at Wadsworth Boulevard and U.S. 285, was attended by about 50 people.

As might be expected, the discussion focused largely on what the candidates have accomplished in the business world and how much they are committed to improving conditions in the business sector.

John Odom, who is running for Jefferson County commissioner in District 2, was not able to attend, but he sent a stand-in [Pols Emphasis], Ben Engen, who described himself as a friend who was also on the vacancy committee that interviewed Odom for the commissioner vacancy after Kevin McCasky resigned to become president of the EDC.

A Jefferson County native, Odom is a businessman who years ago opened a coffee shop in China and has high regard for personal property rights, his stand-in said [Pols Emphasis]. Odom believes that what sets America apart are its strong legal protections for property and contracts, he said. “Here’s a man who says your property should be yours to develop as you see fit.”

He described Odom as a business booster who once purchased airtime at a charity auction and used it to run an advertising campaign encouraging businesses to move to Jefferson County. “That’s the kind of guy John is, always looking for creative ways to improve life in Jefferson County.”

There’s nothing necessarily wrong with candidates occasionally sending surrogates to public events — sometimes day-to-day life gets in the way of campaigning. With Odom, though, sending a Republican operative to this particular community forum is endemic of a larger problem with his strategy: Nobody has seen or heard from him in months. This would’ve been the perfect opportunity for Odom to discuss his diverse experience in the business world. If John Odom has such a high regard for property rights, why couldn’t he show up to a forum to discuss that regard?

In a campaign, it’s not good enough to have a few friends awkwardly telling voters what “kind of guy you are” or discussing your beliefs. You have to show them yourself.

John Odom has run his entire election bid thus far assuming that, because he’s an incumbent Republican, he doesn’t have to work very hard to win another term.

Although Democratic challenger Casey Tighe has been doing a remarkable job for a first-time candidate — he has the wherewithal to attend community events, after all — it’s an unfortunate reality that Odom might just be right.  

Hancock as Huddles: It’s the Narrative that Matters

Denver Mayor Michael Hancock has never been one to conceal the personal narrative driving his political ambitions. He relied heavily on that narrative during his mayoral bid last year, seamlessly weaving his decades of history growing up in Denver into his plan for Denver’s future. Indeed, Hancock’s compelling personal story humanized the candidate — something Chris Romer, the privileged son of a governor, always struggled with — and likely cemented his win during the run-off election.

That story became even more compelling this week, with ESPN’s revelation that Denver’s mayor once served in an arguably higher-profile role: as Huddles, the mascot of the Denver Broncos.

From Michael Roberts at Westword:

During ESPN’s pre-game build-up to last night’s error-filled Broncos loss to the Falcons, past Westword profile subject Rick Reilly hosted a segment featuring Denver mayor Michael Hancock talking in greater detail than he has since being elected (and maybe ever) about what’s arguably his greatest accomplishment:

Serving as Huddles, the Broncos’ mascot.

The bit opens with Reilly on the 16th Street Mall, where he corrals passersby and asks if they recognize Huddles, a long-abandoned mascot far less tough and virile than the current model, Miles. No one does, beyond figuring out that he boosted the Broncos.

Reilly’s also got a photo of Hancock dating back to his old Denver City Council days. When he reveals that the pics of the mayor and the mascot feature the same person, the folks with whom he’s chatting are shocked, and no wonder: While Hancock hasn’t hidden his Huddles past, neither does he make a big deal of it…as he absolutely should!

Then comes the background. Hancock was part of a Broncos youth group in 1986, when he was seventeen…and he was subsequently cajoled into portraying Huddles. As he told Reilly during a sit-down in the mayor’s office, the job’s pay ($25 a pop) was more attractive than the potential dangers (Hancock says Huddles had been smacked with snowballs and set on fire).

Michael Hancock will never be John Hickenlooper, but that’s a good thing. After all, Hancock is able to play the whole “hometown mayor” angle in a way that Hickenlooper never could. If Hick was reluctantly mayor, Hancock’s the guy fulfilling a childhood dream.

The ESPN story is the first major piece of national press Hancock has received since his advisors made boosting his political profile a priority over a year ago. As it turns out, letting Hancock earn organic attention by just being himself is probably the most effective strategy possible.

Effective, that is, as long as there’s an advisor alongside to make sure Hancock doesn’t go too far off message.

What’s Summers’ Strategy in SD-22?

In mid-August, State Representative Andy Kerr for the first time surpassed Republican opponent Ken Summers in funds raised, spent, and on hand in the SD-22 race. In the intervening period, Kerr has kept the pressure on, raising just under $48,000 since July 27th. To put that figure in perspective, that means Kerr has hauled in upwards of $900 a day over the past month and a half.

Summers, meanwhile, raised just over $24,000 in the same period, a rate of about $470 day. That’s right. Kerr has outraised his opponent by a 2-1 margin.

Kerr has lost the lead in cash-on-hand, but that’s not surprising with election day fewer than 50 days away. Since late July, the Democrat has spent just over $44,000, compared to $4,900 for Summers. It’s not as if Kerr is wasting any money, however: the lion’s share of his expenses relate to direct mail costs. Kerr is spending money to connect with voters. More importantly, he’s bringing in more than enough to offset his high burn rate.

Summers, on the other hand, has spent a relatively paltry few thousand on brochures, lapel pins, stamps, and the consulting services of a “field director.”

The SD-22 race is incredibly competitive on paper. Two equally-qualified, incumbent state representatives are running against each other in a district with functionally equal registration numbers. Because neither candidate enjoys a natural advantage, this is one of those campaigns where strategy will or lose the race.

Which begs the question: is Ken Summers incompetent? It bears repeating: election day is now less than two months away. Summers needed to use the summer to engage in substantive voter contact by spending money on direct mail and walk pieces. Ballots will start arriving in mailboxes in a month, at most. Summers hasn’t even started to connect with most of the district, and a month is far too little time to whittle away at Kerr’s lead. Summers has been out walking, but there’s no way he’ll have canvassed as many homes as Kerr’s mail pieces, not to mention the Democrat’s strong and sustained volunteer field efforts. It wouldn’t make a difference if Summers were to spend all $82,000 in his campaign coffers on outreach at this point. Because he hasn’t even made a first impression on many of the district’s voters, saturating SD-22 now won’t boost his profile meaningfully.

Summers may be planning for a late-campaign television blitz. He’s got plenty for a cable advertisement — he’ll only after to buy in one zone — but, effective as TV may be, there are so many ads inundating sets right now that Summers’ spots for a local seat may be drowned out by the noise from the presidential race. Television in a local campaign is most powerful when paired with a robust field and mail effort; voters hear your name on the air and then remember you when they’re contacted again. Summers hasn’t raised enough to afford both television and direct mail on his own, however.

A few conclusions can be drawn from Summers’ strategy at this juncture. The Republican may have good reason to believe that independent expenditure groups will swoop in and dramatically supplement his campaign efforts at the last minute. He also might have purchased direct mail services and is waiting to pay his bill and report those expenditures until he has a better feel for how much will have to come out of his coffers.

Or, perhaps, Summers just doesn’t have the desire, know-how, or tenacity to run the campaign he needs to in order to win this seat. Although Summers has never had a real opponent before, it’s unlikely Republicans would allow him to run such an abysmal race.

But it’s certainly not impossible.

Have you received a mail or walk piece from the Kerr or Summers campaign? E-mail us: info(at)jeffcopols.com.

Mike Johnston Now Delivering Groceries

Since his appointment to the chamber in 2009, State Senator Mike Johnston has always gone the extra mile in service of his constituents. He funds and staffs a community office out of his own wallet – especially remarkable, considering he’s a Denver senator with a district not far from the golden dome itself – and is widely recognized for his accessibility both during and outside of session. Perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that Johnston has added yet another constituent service to his repertoire.

From Johnston:

Senator Johnston and King Soopers are teaming up to help combat the food desert in North Park Hill.

Since 2006, North Park Hill has been trying to get a grocery store built in the area. Now, King Soopers is offering to help: you can order groceries through the store’s online delivery service and have your goods delivered to our community office for free!

Here’s how it works: if you’d like to buy groceries, you can visit our community office Monday, Wednesday, or Friday between 1 and 3pm to order food from the King Soopers website using our office computers. For a delivery charge of around $10, King Soopers will deliver groceries directly to your home (or our office can pick them up and deliver them to you for free). To schedule a different time to order groceries or to ask questions about the program, please contact Leslie Colwell at 720-432-4735 or lcolwell@mikejohnston.org.

Johnston is a rather unique member of the Senate. A prominent and Ivy League-educated expert on education issues, his connections across the country and in the Obama White House could propel him to nearly any position he wanted in Washington, D.C. Many, in fact, expected Johnston to join the administration after Obama’s swearing-in nearly four years ago. Yet he stayed in Denver, appointed to the Colorado State Senate to fill Peter Groff’s seat when the latter took a choice position with the Department of Education. Since first taking office, Johnston has dedicated himself entirely to his duties as state senator, as evidenced by the fact that he’s now delivering groceries.

Seriously, this guy is so committed to his job he’s almost a parody of a straight-laced public servant. It’s easy to imagine him walking up to a Park Hill house with his blazer slung over his shoulder and a bag of groceries in his left hand, reaching out for a handshake with his right and smiling when the door opens, “I’m Mike Johnston. I work for you.”

Johnston burned bridges with many members of his own caucus following the late-night passage of his teacher effectiveness bill in 2010, so questions remain as to whether or not he will ever ascend to leadership. And perhaps leadership isn’t even the best fit for Johnston. The less time he has to spend whipping votes and playing internal politics, the more time he can allot to working directly for and with constituents.

And that, it would seem, is where he’s making the biggest difference.

“We don’t talk about that much,” Romney’s son says when asked whether Mitt spanked him

On KNUS’ morning talk-radio show Thursday, Steve Kelley played an audio clip of Obama criticizing Romney’s response to the Libya attack, saying Romney has a “tendency to shoot first and aim later.” Steve Kelley, the host of the show, had Mitt Romney’s son Josh on the phone, and, it’s only natural to try to personalize […]

Login

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

60 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!