President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Greener Pastures for Wil Alston

Wil Alston, who mounted an unsuccessful 2011 campaign for City Council in District 8, is stepping down from his role as communications director for Denver Mayor Michael Hancock.

That’s the latest word from the Denver newspaper, at least. Alston will instead handle communications in a newly created position at the Denver Department of Finance under the leadership of Denver’s CFO Cary Kennedy.

Alston told the Denver paper that he wanted to “do something with a more strategic focus” – whatever that means.

We doubt that Alston will have half the strategic impact in the Department of Finance as he did in the Mayor’s office. But it’s because his new title will have fewer responsibilities that we suspect Alston is ultimately taking the cut in influence and pay.

Alston made several critical mistakes in shepherding the Mayor’s underlying communications strategy, ranging from rumored clashes with Evan Dreyer to the much maligned (and immediately reversed) decision to ban recording devices from background briefings. Not to mention the implementation of a communications strategy designed to garner Hancock a national profile.

These mistakes made it clear that Alston wasn’t prepared to handle communications for what is arguably the most high-profile elected position in Colorado. Whether Alston, Hancock, or Chief-of-Staff Janice Sinden came to that realization is immaterial – Alston was in over his head.

That Alston is instead landing in a newly-created (and still relatively well-paid) position somewhere else in city government is testament to the strong relationship he has with Hancock. If Alston wasn’t stepping down either on his own accord or on the best of terms, we doubt he’d have had a position created especially for him. That’s not to say friendship blurred Hancock’s vision: Alston’s a talented communicator and even if he lacked the leadership to run an entire communications shop on his own, he’ll likely still be incredibly valuable as an advisor.

A search for a new communications director is underway. It’ll be interesting to see whether Alston’s successor will also be Alston’s boss – all communications coming from the Department of Finance, we presume, will likely be crafted in part by the Mayor’s office.

Until then, hopefully Alston will work to make sure Hancock’s economic policy initiatives sound a little less like investor brochures.  

Lakewood Police Escort All-America Quilt

That’s the headline, at least, from the All-America City Quilt’s recent visit to Lakewood, Colorado.

From 9News and and the National Civic League:

Lakewood, Colorado rolled out the red carpet for the arrival of the All-America City Quilt this week. In fact, the quilt was given a police escort.

NCL President Gloria Rubio-Cortés was on hand to congratulate Mayor Bob Murphy and a group of community leaders.

The quilt has been making rounds of cities that were finalists in the 2011 All-America City Awards. Lakewood was named a 2011 All-America City last June at an award ceremony and celebration in Kansas City, Missouri.

The fact that Lakewood won the 2011 All-America City Award – as well as the first ever “diversity” award – from the National Civic League is testament to the work Bob Murphy and his allies on City Council have done in making Lakewood an “inclusive community” as well as revitalizing West Colfax and the city as a whole. Still, there’s something delightfully campy about the whole process that just screams “small town America.”

A police escort? For a quilt? Well, the All-America quilt is incredibly valuable. Perhaps Murphy was cold and couldn’t wait to cozy up his office. Or perhaps Lakewood was worried about Arvada or Sheridan getting their dirty hands on such a coveted tapestry. Better safe than sorry, right?

Not to mention the presentation Lakewood made to win both the All-America and the right to steward the accompanying quilt. If you haven’t seen it – and you really should – Murphy, some members of City Council, and other community leaders march up on stage wearing matching white t-shirts and talk about what makes Lakewood great while a light guitar ballad plays in the background. It’s a beautiful “kumbaya” moment, with little kids talking about playground inclusiveness and other speakers extolling Lakewood’s values in Spanish.

It’s almost a cliche – when someone says “presentation to the National Civic League,” we can’t imagine them meaning anything other than a song and dance number about some town in Colorado.

Still, in the NCL presentation, you can tell that Murphy and his companions really believe everything that they’re singing (or chanting). They believe that Lakewood really is a thriving economic destination notable for its diversity, inclusiveness, and responsive government. Perhaps that’s exactly why Lakewood deserved the award, and why Murphy has been such a successful mayor. With Lakewood, what you see is what you get. The city’s elected officials really do believe in making their home a great place to live. There are no ulterior motives.

So yes, it’s ridiculous. A quilt probably shouldn’t have a police escort. But Murphy and the rest can be proud of winning the All-America City award. Even if its cliche or campy, they deserve their moment: superfluous police sirens and all.  

Jeffco’s Own “Top Ethical Failure” of 2011

We’ve previously written about Colorado’s Independent Ethics Commission’s investigation surrounding former Jefferson County Commissioner Kevin McCasky.

Colorado Ethics Watch filed a complaint with the Ethics Commission alleging that McCasky lobbied for an increase in county funding to the Jefferson Economic Council while at the same time applying for his current position as president there.

As it turns out, that was (or at least looks like) an incredibly corrupt – not to mention asinine – thing to do. While it may have earned McCasky the job and a pretty pay check, he’s now facing the kind of scorn that will almost certainly smother any future political aspirations. In fact, his actions have earned the rare qualification of “top ethical failure.”

From Colorado Ethics Watch:

Ethics Watch, a nonpartisan, nonprofit legal watchdog group, today released Ethics Roundup: Top Ethical Failures of 2011, the organization’s fourth annual report highlighting Colorado’s public officials, agencies and municipalities who have either committed ethics violations or shown significant lack of judgment that places their behavior in the top tier of ethical failures in the state in the past year.

“Only by paying attention to the actions of our government agencies and officials, identifying ethical lapses, and shining a light on them will we be assured to have what Colorado voters have demanded – transparent and accountable public leaders,” said Luis Toro, director of Colorado Ethics Watch.

Golden Parachute:  After submitting his resume for a highly paid position at the Jefferson Economic Council, Jefferson County Commissioner Kevin McCasky voted to approve a $400,000 grant, an increase of $20,000 over the previous year, from Jefferson County to that organization.

Pior to his tenure at the Jefferson Economics Council, McCasky’s name was often brought up as a potential Republican candidate for CD-7. The commissioner was twice elected countywide despite being by and large perceived as culpable in most of Jeffco’s famed ethical troubles. With this recent investigation, however, McCasky’s name is forever tarnished – he’ll never be able to live down the potential mailers or television ads labeling him as corrupt and making mention of his “golden parachute.”

Unless, of course, he figures out a way to buy a seat in Congress using public funds. It sounds impossible, but it’s par for the course in Jefferson County, where elected officials are the most innovative when determining ways to waste taxpayer dollars.  

Tim Allport to Take on Libby Szabo

With Dianne Primavera itching to take back her old House seat, all eyes turned to former State Representative Sara Gagliardi. Gagliardi narrowly lost her 2010 election to Republican Libby Szabo.

Of course, Primavera likely decided to run after 2010 winner Don Beezely announced he wouldn’t be seeking a second term. But Szabo is running for re-election, and her incumbency is probably enough to ward off a battle weary Gagliardi.

Gagliardi probably had a better chance than most to win her seat back for the Democratic caucus, but HD-27 has always been a tough nut to crack. Even after reapportionment, the Arvada seat is fairly favorable to Republicans. Treasurer Cary Kennedy lost the district with 47% of the vote in her 2010 campaign, and Republicans hold an 8% lead in registration numbers. Though it was a critical 2010 win for Frank McNulty, it’s less likely that Mark Ferrandino will pour resources into the seat in 2012 – there are easier ways to gain back the majority.

Still, Democrats need a candidate capable enough to bolster races up-ballot despite a daunting fight to win the seat. Who, then, is going to run against Szabo?

Cue Democratic activist Tim Allport:

Having served the people of Colorado as a public employee and as an active member of the community, I have a unique background and a strong passion to serve. As a long-time advocate for working families, I have seen Coloradans struggle during this long Recession. I am passionate about finding ways to get them back to work in good-paying jobs and providing a quality education for their children so that they grow up to have a real chance at finding success in America.

My family was always engaged in the political process and while my views have evolved, be assured that my commitment to civic responsibly is stronger than ever. I will work hard to improve our district, our community and the state of Colorado. Like most people who run for office, I have core beliefs, but am committed to getting things done. I will achieve results, respond to everybody and do a great job for the people of House District 27 and the City of Arvada, Colorado.

Thank you for your support.

Allport is a familiar face to many Democrats both in Arvada and the Denver Metro Area. He’s the current chair of the Colorado Democratic Party’s Labor Initiative and a staple of Democratic fundraisers across the county.

But can he win? Allport’s certainly connected enough to the activist core of the Colorado Democratic Party, and we suspect that every notable Dem in Jeffco will at least go canvass for the labor leader. Whether or not he poses a serious threat to Szabo, however, all comes down to his fundraising. If Allport’s numbers are competitive, HD-27 might be useful in the Democratic attempt to regain the House.

If Allport doesn’t pull in the amount of money he needs to, however, it gives good reason for Democrats to ignore HD-27 and focus on easier ways to recapture the speaker’s office. The next few weeks, then, will be critical to the overall viability of Allport’s campaign as he both picks off low-hanging fruit and reaches out to new donors.  

Paging Ted Stevens: Jeffco’s Bridge to Nowhere

We highly recommend you check out 9News’ Kyle Clark’s two pieces on Jeffco’s “Bridge to Nowhere” for examples of truly great investigative reporting.

Clark centers his story on the pedestrian bridge located at Wadsworth Boulevard and Bowles Avenue in South Jeffco, which links Southwest Plaza and Bowles Crossing shopping centers. We’ve seen that bridge before, but we’ve never seen anybody actually use it. Neither mall is really vibrant, and we have a creeping suspicion that the bridge will remain standing much longer than the shipping centers it links.

The most bizarre aspect of this story, though, is that Jefferson County can’t even justify the $3 million they spent on the bridge. At least, they can’t justify it privately.

From 9News:

As Jefferson County publicly defended a $3 million pedestrian bridge at Wadsworth Boulevard and Bowles Avenue as a “lasting asset,” the county’s engineer on the project privately acknowledged it was expensive and unnecessary, 9Wants to Know has learned.

Internal emails obtained by 9Wants to Know using Colorado Open Records Act show county officials struggling to justify the pedestrian bridge, completed in the spring of 2011 using a combination of federal and local tax dollars.

The bridge spanning Wadsworth just north of Bowles, connects two aging shopping malls, Southwest Plaza and Bowles Crossing. Some citizens, including resident Gary Michelson, have dubbed it: “The Bridge To, And From, Nowhere.”

When Michelson wrote to county leaders calling the bridge a “terrible waste of funds,” he received a stock answer from project engineer Brad Bauer that was similar to the two-page defense of the project sent to other concerned citizens. In one such response, Bauer writes the bridge will be a “lasting asset” that will “significantly improve the pedestrian safety at the intersection.”

That is not what the county’s point-man on the project was saying behind the scenes.

After an email exchange with Michelson, Bauer emailed his supervisor on June 22 saying he was “having a hard time coming up with any good response,” adding that he could agree with Michelson’s points about “the bridge being an expensive unnecessary expense.”

Just to make it clear: the liaison for the project is unable to respond to constituent complaints about the bridge, because he agrees with them.

Clark interviews Kevin French, with Jeffco’s Transportation and Engineering Department, and French is about as eloquent as Rick Perry in his most recent debate performance. You really have to watch the interview to get the full effect, but French doesn’t really answer any of Clark’s questions. When asked how French’s department can justify, well, their justification of the bridge to concerned taxpayers, French responds “it’s the best we have.” That’s the answer he finally comes to, at least, after first responding that he “wasn’t sure he had a good answer to that.” If you’re a big fan of deer caught in headlights, it’s a must watch.

This is one of the most asinine government decisions we’ve ever seen, and that’s saying something for Jefferson County. $3 million for a bridge? The August 2009 resolution which Clark discusses is even worse: then Commissioners Kevin McCasky and Kathy Hartman voted for it, as did current Commissioner Faye Griffin.  They approved an “expenditure of an amount not to exceed $376,600.00 to Muller Engineering Company, Inc. for final design, and additional services as needed.”

Nearly $400,000 for the “final design,” huh? 400 grand for a couple of drawings of a bridge? We assume the “additional services as needed” are in case Muller Engineering ran out of graph paper or erasers.

This is an important story for champions of good, transparent government, of course. But it also carries with it political implications. The folks in south Jeffco – those who see this bridge during their daily commutes – historically support the election of Republicans to the Board of Commissioners. But this same bridge, this “monument of government waste,” was approved with the votes of Republicans Kevin McCasky and Faye Griffin. If the vote on this bridge was before 2008’s election, we’re not sure if McCasky could’ve recovered.

Laundry List of Politicos Line Up Behind Kerr

If Brian Carroll and Andy Szekeres had any hopes that there would be at least a few elected officials backing Carroll’s intent to put Rep. Andy Kerr into a primary, they’re probably long gone now.

Kerr’s first e-mail invite to his high profile fundraising event at State Senator Pat Steadman’s home read like a who’s who of Colorado’s GLBT advocacy community.

The follow up e-mail, though, reads like a who’s who of Democratic politics:

Sen. Betty Boyd • Sen. Morgan Carroll • Hon. Terrance Carroll • Rep. Edward Casso • Rep. Lois Court • Rep. Rhonda Fields • Hon. Sara Gagliardi • Rep. Deb Gardner • Rep. Millie Hamner • Sen. Rollie Heath • Sen. Mary Hodge • Rep. Dickey Lee Hullinghorst • Sen. Mike Johnston • Rep. Matt Jones • Rep. Daniel Kagan • Rep. John Kefalas • Hon. Robin Kniech • Rep. Pete Lee • Rep. Claire Levy • Hon. Alice Madden • Rep. Beth McCann • Rep. Wes McKinley • Rep. Joe Miklosi • Hon. Dominick Moreno • Sen. John Morse • Rep. Dan Pabon • House Minority Leader Sal Pace • Hon. Dianne Primavera • Hon. Joe Rice • Hon. Andrew Romanoff • Rep. Su Ryden • Sen. Gail Schwartz • Senate President Brandon Shaffer • Rep. Judy Solano • Rep. John Soper • Rep. Nancy Todd • Rep. Max Tyler • Rep. Angela Williams • Rep. Roger Wilson • Rep. Dave Young

Anthony Aragon • David Beller • Brian Boyles • Mike Brewer • Bobby Clark & Shaun Cartwright • Brad Clark • D.J. Close • Adam Crowley • Will Coyne • Jessie Danielson • Lauri Dannemiller • Preston Dickey & Jon Corrigan • Adam Eichberg • Dennis Hamann • Phil Hayes • Andy Kabza • Courtney Law & Sonja Semion • Scott Martinez • Lynne Mason • Pete Maysmith • Bob Nogueira • Dr. Christopher Ott • Paul Rosenthal • Amy Runyon-Harms • Dan Schoen • Roger Sherman • Andrew Short • Jeff Thormodsgaard • Dr. Mark Thrun • Terry Todd • Ted Trimpa • Jamie Van Leeuwen & Matt Derrington • Jen Walmer • Benjamin Waters • Linda Weinerman • Darrell Watson & Mike Wenk • Julie Whitacre • Andy White • Karen Wick • Gary Wockner • Jess & Addison Woodrum

cordially invite you to a fundraiser in support of pro-equality hero

Andy Kerr

Kerr’s event is being co-hosted (even if honorarily) by nearly every noteworthy Democrat involved with the legislature in some capacity. If Carroll and company didn’t take the hint before, they’re certainly paying attention now. It’s a hard message to ignore: Democrats support Andy Kerr, and they don’t support Carroll’s primary challenge.  

Of course, Carroll probably does enjoy the implicit support of at least one state representative: Ken Summers. We’re sure the Republican is overjoyed at the prospects of Democratic in-fighting in the race to capture his seat.  

Shocker: Jeffco Commissioners Oppose Prop 103

The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners is as predictable as it is timely:

Commissioner Odom moved that the following Resolution be adopted:

BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON

STATE OF COLORADO

RESOLUTION NO.  CC11-401

RE: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS – RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO PROPOSITION 103

WHEREAS, Proposition 103 would raise the state income tax level from 4.63 percent to 5 percent and the state sales and use tax from 2.9 to 3 percent for five years, and

WHEREAS, Proposition 103 requires the state legislature to spend the increased revenue, estimated at approximately $2.9 billion over five years, on education, and

WHEREAS, Jefferson County is dedicated to promoting economic development and economic opportunity for its residents and businesses, and

WHEREAS, Jefferson County attends to the needs of individuals in need, and

WHEREAS, the tax increase comes at a time when even modest hikes could damage many businesses and individuals whose financial situation is precarious,

WHEREAS, the Campaign Reform Act, Section 1-45-117(1)(b)(III)(A) C.R.S., allows the Board to pass a resolution and to take a position of advocacy on any issue.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County opposes Proposition 103 and urges the electors to vote against it to protect businesses and individuals during these difficult economic times.

Commissioner Rosier seconded the adoption of the foregoing Resolution. The roll having been called, the vote was as follows:

Commissioner John Odom Aye

Commissioner Donald Rosier Aye

Commissioner Faye Griffin, Chairman Aye

The Resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado.

Does this really come as a surprise to anyone?  Of course Commissioners Odom, Rosier, and Griffin would oppose Prop 103. The thing is, though, when you do the thing that everybody expects you to do, it isn’t really newsworthy. In that way, Commissioner Odom’s resolution may have the inverse impact of its intent: nobody in the county thought that Odom and company would support 103, but by explicitly coming out against the ballot measure, the Board may make more enemies than they placate friends.

In passing this resolution, the Board has directly come out against increased funding for education. That’s gonna make all three a target for education activists in Jeffco, and that’s going to make for some uncomfortable canvassing at teachers’ doorsteps when all three run for re-election. Or, for that matter, parents’ doorsteps.

The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners isn’t tasked with deciding education policy. In fact, when you step into education policy at all, you run the risk of alienating at least one segment of your constituency. That begs the question, then: why meddle in something so contentious when it neither concerns you nor has that much intrinsic political benefit?

Kraft-Tharp Raises 15 Grand

Make no mistake, the first fundraising report a candidate makes is critically important. Strong fundraising numbers at a campaign’s outset shows that donors are willing to give; after all, if you can persuade donors, you’ll have an easier time persuading voters.

That said, we think the second fundraising report is about ten times more important than the first. In the first quarter of any campaign, it’s the candidate’s responsibility to pick off all the low-hanging fruit. That usually means contributions from family members, close friends, college acquaintances, and party activists. In other words, the people who donate to your campaign right away – still critically important in generating momentum – are donors that you don’t really have to convince to give. They’re going to give anyway. That’s why we’re skeptical of candidates championing “strong” first-ever fundraising reports: they show that the people you know are willing to donate, but the real test is persuading others to open up their wallets.

Cue this press release from Tracy Kraft-Tharp, the democrat hoping to give Rep. Robert Ramirez a run for his money in what was once Debbie Benefield’s HD-29.

As of September 30th, Tracy Kraft-Tharp successfully raised nearly $15,000 in the first three months of her campaign for Colorado House District 29. Receiving contributions from more than 170 individual small donors, Tracy’s campaign has raised $13,777 plus $1000 in in-kind contributions.

Says Kraft-Tharp, “From my conversations with voters at the 1,400 doors I’ve knocked in the last six weeks, it’s pretty clear that the people of Arvada and Westminster want a Representative that shares their priorities. More than anything else, I am hearing people express concern about the future of their kids’ schools as the new budget forecasts show another round of serious cuts next year.”

In a district that remains very competitive in the most-recently adopted maps, Kraft-Tharp’s first quarter will likely draw even more attention to the district that gave the Republicans the majority in the House in 2010 by only 197 votes.

First off, we like that this press release makes sure to point out that Kraft-Tharpe “successfully raised nearly $15,000.” How do you unsuccessfully raise money? Did you have a bunch of donors trying the ol’ quarter-on-a-string trick? People who write press releases for local candidates always try to add this kind of language; we think it’s unnecessary. Those who read your press release will determine if what you did was “successful” or not.

Still, $15,000 is no small sum. The only way to determine if it was “successful,” in our mind, is to compare it to what Rep. Ramirez raised. After all, if Kraft-Tharpe raised $15,000 from low-hanging fruit and Ramirez raised $50,000 (read: not gonna happen), Kraft-Tharpe would have a hard time convincing other donors that she could win. That’s the odd thing, though: Ramirez hasn’t released any reports for his campaign this cycle. Of course, the deadline is still a couple days away, but Ramirez doesn’t even have a campaign committee yet.  At least, not according to the Secretary of State.

That begs the question: what happens if you were to use the donate button on Ramirez’s website? Where does that money go? It’s a little ridiculous that nobody told the incumbent candidate – who won by a hair – to go ahead and legally prepare to run for re-election. If the candidate doesn’t have a committee, he can’t even collect contributions by the books. We have no doubts that Ramirez has been fundraising for his re-election campaign. So why hasn’t he filed?  

No Real Election Battles in JeffCo This Cycle

Political observers itching for a municipal-level fight following the fanfare surrounding Denver’s recent Mayoral election should turn away from Jeffco this cycle.

We wish we could say that the 2011 municipal elections in all of Jefferson County’s cities would be the stuff of excitement and intrigue. We wish we could say that there would be an old-fashioned political brawl for Mayor in places like Golden, Lakewood, Arvada and Wheat Ridge. We wish we could say that.

Unfortunately, though, while recall elections in Wisconsin may attract millions of dollars in out-of-state attention and flames of hostility are fueled by congressional gridlock, Jeffco politics this cycle are a far cry from Tea Party tensions in Washington and around the country. We’d be lucky if any of Jeffco’s cities garnered 1/10th of the excitement of Denver’s otherwise milquetoast 2011 municipal race. Unfortunately, we don’t think even that will happen.

Perhaps that’s a good thing. While municipal elections are too often characterized by angry uprisings from groups of citizens enraged over stop lights and zoning laws, in Jefferson County, at least, they’re also markedly non-partisan. Sure, both progressive and libertarian concepts are often fleshed out at the local level, but because Mayors and City Councilors run without a party identifier attached to their name, political tensions from Washington and the state legislature rarely spill-over into city issues.

It’s because of this nonpartisan nature that, while they may have a fundamental distrust of government as a whole, voters in places like Lakewood and Arvada are still reasonably satisfied with their city government. This satisfaction means that those associated with the status quo in all of Jeffco’s cities are far more likely to sail to re-election. Voters simply do not pay attention to city government unless things are going horribly wrong. While Jefferson County has been hit by economic hardship as badly as any county of its size and makeup, voters have no reason to direct their displeasure at local government this cycle.

It is for this reason that few of the Mayor’s races in any of Jeffco’s cities are seriously challenged in their re-election efforts.  

Alston Working to Raise Hancock’s National Profile

Jeremy Myer over at the Denver newspaper today had an interesting piece on Wil Alston’s primary task of raising the profile of Michael Hancock to garner the mayor some national attention. As Myer points out, Hickenlooper as mayor had an enviable national image. His quirky, soft-spoken personality partnered with his sharp political acumen made him seem like the perfect person to represent Denver nationally. Indeed, Hick’s term as Denver’s de-facto spokesperson culminated in his appearance during the Democratic National Convention in 2008. It’s because the Mayor of Denver also serves as a representative of Colorado and its culture that we’ve always called the position the marquee elected position in Colorado.

The thing is, Michael Hancock is no John Hickenlooper. Not yet, anyway. Hancock’s story is certainly inspirational, gripping, and really something admirable. Yet Hancock just doesn’t have the same personality as Hick. It’s nothing against Hancock; what’s made Hickenlooper such a teflon mayor-cum-governor is that he seemed like somebody you’d want to sit down and have a beer with, somebody you could trust because he’d have no reason to lie to you. Hickenlooper’s communications shop didn’t have to work so hard to promote the mayor’s image because John was already a decent ambassador for the state.

We’d be proud to have Michael Hancock take on the same national profile as John Hickenlooper. Still, we feel it’s a little too soon for Alston to be shopping around Hancock’s story. It feels a little…corporate. While Hancock’s rise to mayor would certainly make good fodder for the Today show, it would be even better if Hancock was first given the chance to accomplish something in the office. If Hancock shines in Denver we have no doubt his name will be brought up for Governor or any other statewide office soon enough. However, if Alston succeeds and Hancock assumes a national profile this early on in his administration, his local and national reputation will be damaged ten times more if he doesn’t remain popular.

The paradox here is that Alston’s communications shop is trying to make Hancock look the natural heir to John Hickenlooper from a national perspective, something that John Hickenlooper would never do or at least admit to doing. The more Alston pushes Hancock’s story, the less organic it seems, the less “Hickenlooper-like” it is. What Alston should be doing is letting Hancock inherit the role; instead of pushing Hancock, he should be showcasing how Hancock is, to borrow the slogan, “moving Denver forward.” That takes time because it takes more than replacing the welcome voice at DIA or snagging a 3 minute appearance with Matt Lauer to have a track record you can brag about.

Login

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

62 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!