President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

What ISN’T Wrong With Colorado Republicans?

Eli Stokols, Fox 31’s political reporter, has a long blog post over at 5280 magazine attempting to analyze the problems with Colorado’s Republican Party. Stokols points out one specific problem that we have long scratched our head about in regards to the GOP:

Early in 2012, Mitt Romney paid his first visits to Colorado, to far-flung places such as Fort Lupton and Craig, a good 200 miles from Denver. After a few such trips, some political observers, myself included, began to wonder why the GOP nominee was focusing on these reliably red and sparsely populated parts of the state. It made a certain amount of sense: No one expected Obama to win Colorado as easily as he did, and no one ever expected Mitt Romney to win Denver County anyway.

However, it’s become clear that Obama’s margin in Colorado owes itself to not just winning Denver, but to flat out running up the score here, thumping Romney by almost 150,000 votes. Breaking the 70 percent mark in a base county is a positive for any candidate; doing it in a state’s most populous county means game over.

We’ve written in this space many times about how Democrat Ken Salazar defeated Republican Pete Coors in their 2004 Senate battle because of Denver. It wasn’t that Salazar outperformed Coors in Denver in terms of percentages, but rather the enormous number of votes that gave him a cushion to win the seat despite tighter results elsewhere in Colorado. We’ve never understood how Republicans don’t seem to understand that 85% of Colorado voters live along the Front Range, and Mitt Romney’s campaign is yet another example of that confusion.

In late May 2012, Romney’s campaign made a big deal out of his appearance in Craig, Colorado, a town in Northwest Colorado with a population of less than 10,000 people. We were baffled at the choice of Craig as a campaign stop, but Romney did go on to win Moffat County (Craig is the largest town in Moffat) with 76 percent of the vote. Nevermind that the vote totals were 4,695 for Romney and 1,330 for Barack Obama.

Romney continued to generally avoid large population areas in Colorado, and at one point in the fall he hadn’t visited the Denver Metro area in 30 days. Perhaps he thought each Colorado county would serve as 1/64th of an electoral vote, because the numbers are staggering otherwise.

Obama defeated Romney in Colorado by 137,858 votes. Of Obama’s 1,323,101 votes in the state, 914,815 came from just seven counties (Jefferson, Denver, Boulder, Arapahoe, Douglas, Adams and Larimer). In those seven counties, Obama outpolled Romney by 264,193 votes — nearly double his final margin of victory.

Maybe Romney wouldn’t have performed much better if he had campaigned more in Metro Denver, but he couldn’t have done any worse. Outside of Douglas and El Paso counties, the two largest Red counties in Colorado, Romney’s only hope was to somehow increase turnout in smaller West Slope counties. Of course, that would only work if he simultaneously figured out a way to dramatically increase the population of Western Colorado.

This isn’t the only reason why Republicans are having a hard time winning major statewide elections in Colorado, but it’s a big one.

 

What 5 bills would you introduce?

Ok, with session about to start, if you were in the House what 5 bills would you introduce? I’ll start it off with my 5:

  1. Civil Unions
  2. Call for a constitutional convention. That will work as well as any of the other convoluted suggestions. And it will be quicker.
  3. Effective campaign finance reform. Either public financing or unlimited with full disclosure. Including Congressional elections in the state.
  4. Create a legislative research group who’s job is to measure the effectiveness and ROI of legislation, departments, etc.
  5. Invest in local start-ups. More jobs, better jobs, and the state turns a profit. What’s not to like?

What’s Next for Doug Linkhart?

We’ve always enjoyed reading former City Councilman Doug Linkhart‘s e-mail newsletters if for no other reason than they’re such an embodiment of Doug Linkhart himself. They’ve always been goofy, easy reads that try to take the dullness out of some aspects of city government. Rife with exclamation marks and saturated with with the e-mail writing style of a technologically overzealous grandparent, Linkhart’s e-mails always did a moderately entertaining job of explaining, say, how to deal with graffiti in your neighborhood and what upcoming community invents the Councilman would like you to attend.

Of course, because they were such friendly, good-natured updates on what Doug was doing on City Council, we never read them as comprehensively as the former Councilman would’ve liked us to. That said, in announcing his transition out of office in a newsletter dated July 13, one particular passage caught our eye:

It’s been great to be of service to you for the past eight years. As of press-time I don’t know exactly what I’ll be doing next. I am confident that my email address, Doug.Linkhart@Denvergov.org, will stay the same, though my title and phone number will change. Please stay in touch!

Folks, this classic off-the-cuff comment from Linkhart was a not-so-subtle revelation that Doug expected to find a job in the Hancock administration after he left Council. After all, why shouldn’t he? Linkhart’s early endorsement of now-Mayor Hancock was important in getting Michael elected. Could Hancock have won it without Linkhart’s help? More than likely. But Linkhart endorsed Hancock and lent him a not inconsiderable number of supporters, and that never hurts in an election as contested as this year’s was.

So it’s not too strange that Linkhart pretty much admitted that he’d be sticking around in City Government. What is odd, however, is that no public announcement has been made of Linkhart joining the Hancock team. It’s been more than two weeks since Doug ever-so-coyly told his subscribers that he’d still be involved with the city. Two weeks on, and for all we know, Linkhart is still out in the cold (or the heat, as it may be).

We’ve heard from a few sources that there’s a seat for Linkhart at Hancock’s table. The real question, then, is what’s the hold-up?

Of course, this isn’t the first time the Hancock administration has been rather dawdling in its announcements of staff and cabinet appointments. We’re sure it won’t be the last, either. But that’s not abnormal for a transition period between one administration and another.  

What’s In a Name?

(cross-posted at Colorado Pols)

Former Denver City Council member Carla Madison was running unopposed for re-election when she died on April 5 after a two-year battle with cancer. Because ballots for the May 3 Municipal Election had already been printed, any candidate wishing to run for City Council in District 8 could only do so as a write-in candidate.

The deadline to declare yourself as a write-in candidate passed on April 18, and there are 38 candidates who could be elected to the city council as a write-in choice.

As we’ve written before, winning a write-in campaign against someone whose name appears on the ballot is virtually impossible to do on a local level because voters need to be able to do more than just recognize your name — they have to remember it enough to write it down. In a Denver Municipal election where most voters don’t even know who’s running for Mayor, we’re fascinated to see how this will turn out. Candidates have very little time to campaign and get their name out, and while we’ve gotten various press releases touting endorsements, none of that matters unless voters remember how to spell your name. As the Denver Elections Division explains:

Write-in candidates do not appear on the ballot. A write-in candidate’s name must be physically written in (no stamps or stickers) on the “write-in” line for that race on the ballot. Voters must also connect the arrow on the write-in line for the vote to be counted.

We don’t know enough about what other options Denver had for filling the seat in District 8 other than to force a massive write-in election, but obviously this isn’t a great way to choose an elected official. With ballots already in the mail, the eventual winner in District 8 may just be the person who has the most memorable name…period. Just for a moment, ignore any qualifications or endorsements and just look at the list of names below — which “name” do you think voters would be most likely to remember to write down on a ballot?

Our best guess is that Britt Gallagher, whoever that is, has a distinct advantage because he (or she?) has the same last name as long-time Denver politician Dennis Gallagher, whose name will appear on the ballot for re-election as Denver Auditor (was there no-one named Ed Hickenlooper in District 8?) But what say you, Polsters?

What’s in a website?

Can we draw any conclusions from the websites of the Jeffco Dems and the Jeffco GOP?  The GOP is on message, showing their happy volunteers and proudly displaying their 2010 candidates.  Well, not all of their 2010 candidates.  David Villano and Libby Szabo are conspicuously absent.  Perhaps the party leadership is only displaying the candidates they’ve approved.  On the other hand, the D’s don’t have pictures of any of their candidates.  Perhaps they haven’t approved any.  They seem quite proud of their fundraising, but what good are the funds if they’ve lost sight of their mission.  My conclusion… the R’s will fight hard for their pets, while the D’s don’t know what they’re fighting for.

What Does Blue Do for You in 2024?

We first started taking note of Congressional funding requests from Colorado’s delegation back in 2021, when rules were relaxed on so-called “earmarks” after a 10 year moratorium on the process. As we noted in May 2021, Colorado received $123.3 million in “Member Designated Projects” and “Community Funding Requests” for local communities — every dime of […]

What the Weirdos are Worried About at the State Legislature

The 2024 state legislative session has gotten off to a slow start, primarily because House Republicans have been following the lead of their brethren in Congress by acting ridiculous and focusing a significant amount of time on attacking each other. Now that the Republican micro-minority in the House finally has a new “leader,” state legislators […]

What the Hell, Tim Hernandez?

A former school teacher named Tim Hernandez was selected by a vacancy committee on August 26 to serve the remainder of the term of former Rep. Serena Gonzales-Gutierrez, who resigned her seat after winning election to the Denver City Council in June. Hernandez will serve in the state legislature for one session because of the […]

What in the Hell is Lauren Boebert Doing?

Near the end of this week’s episode of the Get More Smarter Podcast, hosts Jason Bane and Ian Silverii spent a few minutes discussing the absurdity of Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis waging an all-out political war on The Walt Disney Company because it disagreed with his “Don’t Say Gay” law. DeSantis is betting that […]

What you can do to fight for progress this week (May 1)

It’s the final full week of the 2023 session of the Colorado General Assembly. This probably isn’t the only action alert you’ll get from us this week, so let’s jump right into actions you can take both now and later to make a difference in these hectic final days. We’re close to success on legislation […]

Login

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

130 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!