U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(D) Julie Gonzales

(R) Janak Joshi

80%

40%

20%

(D) Michael Bennet

(D) Phil Weiser
55%

50%↑
Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) Jena Griswold

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Hetal Doshi

50%

40%↓

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) J. Danielson

(D) A. Gonzalez
50%↑

20%↓
State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Jeff Bridges

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

50%↑

40%↓

30%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(D) Wanda James

(D) Milat Kiros

80%

20%

10%↓

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Alex Kelloff

(R) H. Scheppelman

60%↓

40%↓

30%↑

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) E. Laubacher

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

30%↑

20%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Jessica Killin

55%↓

45%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Shannon Bird

(D) Manny Rutinel

45%↓

30%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 18, 2009 07:26 PM UTC

"Voucherizers" Hold Key Norton Campaign Positions

  •  
  • by: Colorado Pols

We talked a couple of times earlier about Senate candidate Jane Norton’s first big campaign promise–that is, her pledge to abolish the U.S. Department of Education if elected. As you know, we don’t think such a radical prescription for public education was the best thing for her to lead off with in this campaign: red meat for the “Tea Party” contingent everyone agrees the Republicans need on board next year, but not so good for gaining the support of a majority of Colorado residents–who one actually needs to win the general election.

But it’s easier to understand what motivated Norton to take this strident position on public education once you take a look at who is involved with her campaign. Earlier this week, Norton’s campaign released a list of county campaign chairs. In El Paso County, you’ll notice four co-chairs with the same last name–Bill, Dede, Joyce and Steve Schuck.

Steve Schuck has been at the center of voucher and other “school choice” battles in Colorado for years. In 1998, Schuck was a key proponent of a failed ballot measure to dramatically privatize Colorado public schools, allowing education tax dollars to pay for Christian or other religious instruction: the ‘full monte’ of ‘school choice’ advocates. A similar plan backed by Schuck in 2003 for Denver Public Schools was declared unconstitutional and thrown out. An editorial from the CEA Journal summarized at the time (articles retrieved from Lexis-Nexis):

‘Sen. John Andrews. Alex Cranberg, Ed McVaney, and Steve Schuck [have] the bucks to buy anything they want. Former U.S. Rep Bob  Schaffer and his pro-voucher Colorado Alliance for Report in Education. Roman Catholic Bishops. Right Wing legislators and  groups outside Colorado with a common agenda: the destruction of  public education and the eventual privatization of K-12.’

In 2000, the Denver Post called out Schuck for his possible “hidden agenda” after helping raise hundreds of thousands of dollars in support of then-Gov. Bill Owens’ education plans:

Such secrecy prompts us to question who is behind this coalition – and why they remain unidentified. Several of the chief players are known – including ardent vouchers advocate Steve Schuck, a Colorado Springs developer, and Ed McVaney, a software-company chairman who contributed $ 250,000 to the 1998 push for tax credits (i.e. vouchers).

Vouchers allow parents to take education tax dollars out of public schools to use in private schools instead. We support vouchers on a limited basis – to be used by low-income people  whose children are stuck in poor-performing public schools…

We’re very pleased that business people also have decided to support Owens’ plan.

What we won’t support, however, is any stealth campaign for full-throttle vouchers.

Well, now that Norton has come out for abolishing the Department of Education, you can make a pretty good argument that Schuck’s campaign to privatize education has gotten a little less, you know, “stealthy.” What this means to you depends on whether or not you agree with Norton and Steve Schuck on education issues: but for all the agitation we perennially hear about it, every statewide ballot measure to “voucherize” education in Colorado has failed miserably. Much like the “Tea Partiers” Norton is trying to appease with this, we predict only a small minority of voters will be supportive of Norton’s idea–the majority will find it ideologically stilted and repellent.

Comments

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

40 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!