…is the poll on November 02, 2010, when the Dems face off against the Republicans. In the meantime, are we going to lift our party, lift our candidates, lift our philosophies and our platforms, or tear each other down? Will the country benefit if we rip primary candidates in our own party a new one (so to speak) in front of the hungry appetites-for-dirt of the other party? How?
Andrew Romanoff —
8 years legislative experience in the State House
Charming and persuasive
Bold leadership style
Good sense of humor
Sincere interest in serving others
Cares about people
Much loved and respected in CO
Excellent speaker
Committed to improving lives through legislation.
Has helped many friends in their own elections
Has strong support in the State Democratic party leadership.
Senator Michael Bennet —
Smartest guy I know
Amazing problem solver
Thinks outside the box
Bold leadership in US Senate
Experience outside of politics
Listens to constituents/ responsive
Leads by example
Sincere interest in serving others
Cares about people
Wife Susan is respected in her field/ beautiful family
Strong speeches on Senate floor
Committed to improving lives through legislation.
Has solid support of Governor, President, unaffiliated Obama voters and independents, Dems nationally, growing support within the state party.
The candidates are almost identical on policy. Michael Bennet knows how to raise campaign money, is in the seat already, and is doing a fantastic job.
Colorado is fortunate to have such a difficult decision to make between now and August. Either way, we win, if we don’t tear apart the Democratic party in the process of choosing a candidate in the primary.
Jane Norton should be shaking in her boots. Capisce?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
A primary is a good thing,
especially when the incumbent Senator has Never been elected to any public office, was a political unknown and did not propose to support issues dear to the Democratic Base until “after” he was faced with a Primary Challenger, former Colorado House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. Romanoff has a long record in the Colorado Democratic Party. Andrew, we know you. Michael Bennet, not so much.
Michael Bennet was appointed over the objections of many in the Colorado Democratic Party. Gov. Ritter caused this split by appointing someone who had no elected political history.
Not my fault and not yours, Ritter’s alone!
The smartest guys in the room have been leading America down the wrong path for decades.
Assuming that the base of our party would calmly accept as our Senator someone whose recent employment included being the goto guy for Colorado’s Mr. Conservative, billionaire Phil Anchutz, is just naive.
Colorado Democrats are looking forward to being able to decide at Our Caucus and at Our Primary, Who Our Candidate will be, without any candidate being forced down our throats, by anyone, including a Democratic President who we still may support, but whose actions are beginning to concern us.
Obama’s raising nearly three quarters of a Million dollars for Bennet is just wrong, especially as Bennet already had seven or eight times as much money as Andrew Romanoff. Trying to bury Romanoff in Bennet’s Millions?
All available polls show that Andrew Romanoff has the support of the base of the Colorado Democratic Party, yet Senator Bennet’s Millions are used to present his win as a preordained fact, inevitable and incontestable. With Bennet’s Millions we will wear you down, bury your facts, and make you accept Bennet’s version of reality.
“doing a fantastic job” is in the eye of rank and file Democrats. Personally, I don’t see it.
And you’ve done a Wonderful Job of randomly capitalizing Certain Words for emphasis! Did you Learn to write via the Unabomber Correspondence School of Manifesto Composition? If so, Bravo! If not, my Apologies!
Re: fantastic job — When was the last time you studied his record? Something tells me “never”.
Re: Michael Bennet, we don’t know you — I do, and I love what I’ve seen.
Re: President personally endorsing and Ritter choosing — they both have/had those right.
Re: preordained fact, inevitable and incontestable — not true, that is why we have a caucus, a primary and an election. Democracy at work.
Re: employment included being the goto guy for Colorado’s Mr. Conservative, billionaire Phil Anchutz — I have worked for people I can’t stand politically. Most people have. We get the hell out of there as soon as it makes sense. Bennet did too — then went to work for John Hickenlooper. Are you going to trash him here, too?
Re: The smartest guys in the room have been leading America down the wrong path for decades. — Please tell me you just did not call Bush/Cheney/Lay/Rove/Wolfowitz et. al, “the smartest guys in the room”.
I Would Have Written My Entire Comment in Alternating Caps. lol
If Bennet does better than Ronanoff’s camp expects at the caucus, how will it be spun then? No money has been used for expensive ads, fliers, etc. Just curious.
It’s pretty easy to see the Romanoff campaign reaction after caucus, no matter what the result.
But I’m here to build the party, and that kind of speculation would not do that.
Kick em in the knee….
We need to hold a national majority in both houses that will work with the President.
Locally, Mayor Hickenlooper and the state house races are just as important (maybe more so)
You know I love you, but I don’t agree that these candidates are all created equal and everything is just going to be hunky dory.
Personally, I do not believe that Andrew Romanoff is “lifting the debate.” I do not believe he is “lifting our philosophies and our candidates or our platforms,” as you hope.
He is lying about a sitting Senator who could actually use his help for a very important general election.
He is burning bridges with people who used to support him.
He has gone too far and discredited himself in the process. I think he is hurting his party’s chances of retaining the seat, and he has hurt himself.
I am not in a position to defend a guy I used to admire who is doing and saying some appallingly false things.
You know I love you, but I don’t agree that these candidates are all created equal and everything is just going to be hunky dory.
Personally, I do not believe that Andrew Romanoff is “lifting the debate.” I do not believe he is “lifting our philosophies and our candidates or our platforms,” as you hope.
He is lying about a sitting Senator who could actually use his help for a very important general election.
He is burning bridges with people who used to support him.
He has gone too far and discredited himself in the process. I think he is hurting his party’s chances of retaining the seat, and he has hurt himself.
I am not in a position to defend a guy I used to admire who is doing and saying some appallingly false things.
… for the double post. Not sure how that happened, but it was accidental.
A old friend of mine who has passed used to say that you should only say good things about others. He said his ex-wife made a great strawberry cheese cake. That’s all he said about marriage.
Perhaps I was more than generous.
On a lighter note — did you read the Dem caucus predictions thread? RockyMountainModerate wrote one that made me snort organic yogurt out my nose laughing. (I shouldn’t blog while I eat dinner.)