U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 23, 2006 10:33 PM UTC

Is Gigi Crossing the Line?

  • 24 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Secretary of State Gigi Dennis is under fire for a series of new campaign rules that critics say hurt Democrats far more than they hurt Republicans. From The Denver Post:

A group of individual citizens, unions and a state representative filed suit Tuesday accusing Republican Secretary of State Gigi Dennis of abusing her power in issuing new campaign finance rules.

The rules, which affect unions, small-donor committees and grassroots volunteers, appear to make it more difficult for Democratic campaigns. They were issued just two and a half months before the November election.

“The secretary has had a year to consider campaign finance changes. Unfortunately, she chose to do it now,” said plaintiffs’ attorney Mark Grueskin, who filed the suit in Denver district court. “This is a case of overreaching by the secretary that went beyond the constitution.”

The suit asks the court to hold a hearing and issue an injunction so that the campaign finance rules are not enforced. Dennis said she stands by the rules she put in place on Aug. 2…

…Currently, the state constitution allows people to volunteer their time for political candidates or groups without it being considered a campaign contribution. Dennis’ new rules, however, define those volunteer activities as “services provided solely on the basis of time” such as bookkeeping and legal advice or a volunteer representing a firm or corporation.

The new rules, Grueskin contends, prohibit precinct walkers, door knockers and other volunteers associated with get-out-the-vote efforts. “It’s limiting activities people have associated with politics for years,” he said.

Comments

24 thoughts on “Is Gigi Crossing the Line?

  1. The role of the Secretary of State is to make rules to enforce laws passed by the legislature (or the voters in cases of initiatives). She has no authority to “create” laws where they do not already exist.

    Having now had to read and digest her Aug 2nd rulemaking decisions, it does seem to me she has created some law that did not previously exist in statute.

    Her “clarification” of the exemption of volunteer time as a campaign contribution is simply not backed up by statute. Neither is the portions that deal with small donor committees.

    Regardless of how anyone feels about the small donor committees, they are regulated by statute and the Sec. of State does not have the authority to add regulations beyond those in statute.

    1. Why does Gigi hate democratic participation? Oh, right. The Republicans are on the roaps and need all the help they can get. This is a clear instance of abuse of poer. More than that, it shows a lack of conscience and character. Need I say more?

    1. We just use whichever seems more appropriate in a sentence.  I mix “Ed” and “Perlmutter” in my sentences just to keep things lively.

      Or we could just genericize it to “The Trailhead-Appointed Colorado Secretary Of State”, but that doesn’t fit well in a headline.

      1. BB fan but I’m thinking we R’s can come up with a nickname for the D’s choice.

        How about Second Choice Ritter?

        Or Back Up Choice Ritter?

        Or Plea Bargain Ritter?

        I kinda like Second Choice Ritter as his name wasn’t even mentioned here for months when the Holy Hickenlooper was teasing yall……………..

      2.   After all, it was a Republican (a bit extreme but a principled Republican) who coined the nickname “Both Ways.”  Of course Republicans use it almost as much as Dems do. 

  2. How do you actually enforce something like this?  Do volunteers have to “clock in” pay them virtual minumum wage and then if they exceed their $400 limit they are no longer allowed to volunteer?

    This is custom made to make good old fashoined campaigning next to impossible!  Unless you have the money to run nasty attack ads, and 11th hour mailings and tv spots you are screwed!

    F*ck you Gigi.

  3. This ruling will not stand because it is a clear violation of the first amendment.  This over reaching will likely get all of the other rules thrown out as well.

    So what will happen with the vaunted 96 hour teams that the Rs have used in the past.  All those folks were paid (most from out of state), that would seem to compound the contribution issue as the funds used to pay the ‘volunteers’ can be originally sourced to contributers who have maxed out.

    1. …….Let’s continue to allow union bosses decide how the 1st Amendment applies to their members.

      I need to research whether the SOS opinion is consistent with current law, but nonetheless, you guys need to admit that union small donor committees amount to a shakedown of its members.

      1. A shakedown?  What do you know about unions? strength in numbers? collective bargaining?

        When you join a union, you pay “union dues,” which goes towards administrative costs, including the ability for the union to lobby and participate in the political arena in favor the entire union. 

        It’s a part of being in a union.  FROM THEM TO WORK FOR YOUR BENEFIT.

          1. seems typical of the new, less compassionate branch of the Republican Party.  Your demonizing attitude and that of others in the party is part of why I left – the other part being the takeover of the party by a group of people who blaspheme the meaning of a religion I take very seriously.

            Without unions, we’d still be working a 60-80 hour work week.  Without unions, we’d probably be paying our teachers minimum wage by now.  Without unions, America’s workforce would be significantly reduced by injuries caused by lax safety standards.

            “who determines who is benefited?”  The State Legislature and Governor get to pass the laws and ratify them, respectively.  Not the Secretary of State, and certainly not the Secretary of State under orders from the Beauprez campaign and the Trailhead Group.

            Once again a Radical Republican shill demonstrates why the current Republican philosophy shouldn’t run the government: because it doesn’t understand the workings of government, and therefore it has no repsect for government.

      1. I’m not sure the average voter has really knows what the SOS does or understands or cares about campaign finance laws. Unless Coffman and Gordon run TV ads, only those of us depraved enough to be interested will know what’s up.

        1. And in this election, the (R)s are going to have a hard time rallying the grassroots, so what do they lose by rolling the dice.  The cost of defending this decision will be borne by the State, the cost of challenge will take money from the (D)s.  I would expect the same type of thing to show up soon in voter eligibility. 

  4. Of course this is crossing the line.  It’s just another example of Republican election officials doing everything in their power to help their candidates win when they ought to be devoted to well run, fair, honest elections.  This is one more reason why it’s so important to elect Ken Gordon Secretary of State.  The democratic process is his passion.  As  State Senate majority leader he has proven his integrity time and again. If we want an election process above reproach from start to finish, let the chips fall where they may, we need to elect Ken Gordon.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

88 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!