U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 16, 2007 06:39 PM UTC

Udall Files for Senate, Reports $1.5 Million

  • 23 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols


As Colorado Confidential reports:

Congressman Mark Udall (D-Eldorado Springs) today announced his plans to officially file paperwork to form a new Senate election committee, the first formal step in his expected run for the Senate in 2008.

Udall, the only known candidate for the 2008 Senate race, discussed his intentions for the senate as well as the results of his first quarter fundraising efforts on a conference call with reporters this morning.

“It’s a political milestone for me today,” said Udall. “Completing this paperwork is the first step towards building a successful campaign organization. Today is not an official announcement but is a confirmation of my long-stated intention to run for U.S. Senate in 2008.”

Udall raised $334,882 for his congressional campaign in the first quarter of 2007, all of which is transferrable into a campaign for Senate. More importantly, Udall surpassed $1.5 million ($1,537,686) in cash on hand. In the 2004 Senate race, Democrat Ken Salazar spent roughly $10 million in order to defeat Republican Pete Coors, and Udall says that while his campaign team is still looking at an exact projection, that number will be the minimum needed to win in 2008.

Comments

23 thoughts on “Udall Files for Senate, Reports $1.5 Million

  1. Wow, so the Dems have come together behind one candidate already and that one candidate has a boat load of money to start.  Meanwhile, the R’s Senate Committee told their best candidate, McInnis, not to run because he unwisely paid his own wife from his campaign fund and has a record as a lobbyist.  Of course, he was the only one who could have started out with money close to Udall’s.

    So, who wants to be the GOP’s Beauprez/Coors of 2008?  Anyone? Bueller?  Bueller? 

    1. I don’t think McInnis was the best possible candidate (for a number of reasons, I think Shaffer is).

      Secondly, I was under the impression that the Senate committee never told McInnis not to run, and that he decided he didn’t want to due to all the effort it would take and the paycut he would get if he won.

  2. Don’t worry about the GOP.  We’re just fine, thanks.  There will be no primary in this red state.  Bob Schaffer will emerge from the fog to rescue the state from the narrow liberalism of wealthy left-wing donors.  He will ride a united GOP to victory in 2008.

    Good luck latte Mark!

    1. Mark is seen across the state is a liberal from Boulder. If the Repubs field a strong middle repub Mark may have a much harder fight then anyone is thinking.

      1. Let’s face it, this is Schaffer’s race unless–and this may very well happen–the national environment for the GOP is so messy that Colorado voters won’t give a damn how liberal Udall is as long as he isn’t a Republican.

        Then we’ve got a horse-race. 

        Schaffer is congenial enough to come across as center-right.  Even if he’s viewed as an Allard-esque conservative I doubt it will hurt him.  Here I’d rather be running as a conservative than a liberal.  You don’t see campaign ads about someone’s conservatism–it’s always a scary add with dark colors and low voices about how liberal someone is.  Liberalism–not conservatism–is the great Centennial scare tactic.

        With that said I fear an anaemic GOP POTUS candidate, a major Schaffer campaign gaffe (like Beauprez’s maniacal obsession with immigration), or a deadly national environment like 2006 (not likely)–all of that could screw the Red Team.

      2. But Shaffer is no “middle repub” and it looks like he’s the one, and it dosen’t look like he’s going to try to run to the middle either (not a chance in hell).  How do you see a Shaffer Udall matchup ? ( all mouth frothing from Dobby aside)

        1. No if a right winger comes into play… for sure it’s udall’s race.

          Look a number of repubs won state wide last time. Udall does not play great outside of the denver metro and cd 2 areas.  He is not loved by the western slope nor past castle rock.

          1. Udall will have a tough fight on his hands.  To be honest I’m surprised Mark has been so quite.  You’d think he’d be more active trying to prove his moderate strips and not let himself be painted as the boulder liberal. 

              1. because he’s not telling or directing people to think anything else about him all they have to go on is he’s a Boulder Democrat who’s been in congress for a while.  If I were him those are the last things I’d want people to know about me and I’d be doing anything I could to portray myself as moderate.  It’s not an image that will come naturally for him so he better get cracking.

                1. I basically agree. The only thing I can think of is they want to see who the likely GOP candidate will be before they decide on what “image” they want for him and how to pursue it. I’m not sure which way is better, waiting or risking going down the wrong path.

                  1. Many of the folks in DC are really worried about the drain of cash from the low giving state like CO towards prez level and away from state, local and city races in 08.  There is a real chance we can loose support on a state level because races wont have the money to run.

          2. A significant base to catch the ones running away from the failed policies of the the far righties. If the Dems in the state house keep passing laws for the common guy, a lot of Indies will back Mark vs a far right R. 

            The R’s need a more moderate candidate, but I have no idea who that might be in CO.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

106 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!