U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 11, 2007 11:38 PM UTC

Schaffer Announcement Tomorrow...Maybe

  • 19 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols


Republican Bob Schaffer is reportedly going to make an announcement tomorrow regarding the U.S. Senate race. Again.

As The Fort Collins Coloradoan reports:

Fort Collins Republican and former congressman Bob Schaffer is expected to make an announcement Saturday night in Boulder regarding his intention to run for the U.S. Senate.

“I know he is going to be making an announcement about his plans,” Colorado Republican Party Chair Dick Wadhams said. “I personally hope he will become a candidate for the U.S. Senate because Bob is one of the most thoughtful and articulate politicians Colorado has ever had.”

This is all well and good, except for the fact that Schaffer already announced that he would run for Senate two weeks ago. Of course, that was before he said that he really didn’t announce. Or something. We can’t really follow anymore.

Comments

19 thoughts on “Schaffer Announcement Tomorrow…Maybe

    1. Hmmmm, announcing his candidacy exactly two weeks after he announced it in Teller County.

      I guess his lawyers told him he better announce, or else face an FEC complaint.

      Off to a great start!

  1. Doesn’t really matter if he announces now or a year from now, with Shari Williams and the Beauprez crew at the helm the outcome is a forgone conclusion.

  2. He’ll probably make his announcement right next to a Wiccan shop just to show how liberal Udall supposedly is.  What it will really show is that by doing so, Schaffer is showing how much of a right-wing bigot he is.

    1. Wouldn’t he want to formally announce at a place that represents his base, his values, his campaign?  Boulder dosen’t quite strike me as that place.

      1. But, I believe the Boulder Repubs Lincoln Day Dinner is tomorrow.  I assume there aren’t a whole lot of big repub events in the near future…

      2. Udall will run as the conservative pro-business candidate and Schaffer will run as the liberal pro-environment candidate.

        They know they have their base – both will push as far to the center as is believable, and then a bit more, trying to grab the center.

        So it makes good political sense for Schaffer to officially announce in Boulder and for Udall to do so in the Springs.

  3. If Udall’s not gonna do it–not prudent or whatever–than, damn it, Schaffer’s gonna!  I heard that Udall was going to have a big campaign kickoff away from Boulder so that, you know, he can kind of shed that nasty Boulder liberal image.  He wants to hold it a long, long way from Boulder. 

    He’s going to Niwot, baby!

     

  4. Hey, he’s rusty!  Nearly a decade of keeping his word (memo to Three-Term Tom Tancredo!) means he’s a little off his game.

    When I met Pete Coors shortly after he announced his candidacy for the Senate, I asked him a tough question, and he looked at me like Dan Quayle caught in the headlights.  In his speech to us delegates, he said that he pretty much agreed with all that BS stood for … which prompted me to ask, “Why in the he11 are you running?”  As George Patton once said, “if everyone in the room is in agreement, no one is thinking.”

    While I disagree with him on a lot of issues, I respect Bob as a person because he actually kept his word in the big things (not running for re-election like Tom), which is as rare among our politicians as a diamond in a dung-hill.  Given the distressing alternative — craven and hypocritical politicians like John Suthers — I welcome ‘character’ guys like Schaffer. (And okay, when it comes to politicians’ character, remember that in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. :))

    1. I remember for the first month or so of Pete Coors’ campaign, his most usual response to a question was, “I don’t know.”

      While I certainly prefer politicians who do know something about topics, I did find his candor refreshing.

      Even though I would never vote for Schaffer, at least he appears to be a man of his word, and consistent.

      Good Patton quote!

  5. What’s the difference between Schaffer telling folks at an LDD he intends to run for Senate and Udall telling folks ever since he did the deal with Salazar in ’04 that they need look no farther than our favorite Boulder Liberal for a senatorial Candidate in ’08?

    Without a Primary challenger, Bob has plenty of time to announce his intentions for his Senate run.

    1. he has too because he let it slip a couple of weeks ago that he was running. Some people said there’s FEC rules that kick in when you do that. I don’t know, though…

    2. If he waits much longer, it looks like “well no one else is running, so I guess I’ll be senator.” By announcing early, candidates appear to be the inevitable choice. One reason Udall has no primary is because he was hinting at this a year ago and announced early. Everyone thought Udall would be the inevitable choice and accepted it as such.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

166 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!